Skip to main content

Some Observations on Noncommutative Substructural Logics

  • Chapter
Logic and Foundations of Mathematics

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 280))

  • 337 Accesses

Abstract

In this short note, we will discuss some problems related to noncommutative substructural logics. Here, by noncommutative substructural logics, we mean substructural logics which have neither exchange rules nor axioms for exchange, in general. So, they include some extensions of Lambek calculus and some of relevant logics, for which many works have been done. (See, e.g., [3, 4, 6, 9] and [10].) On the other hand, they haven’t been discussed so often within a common framework. Here, we will try to discuss some problems on noncommutative substructural logics on the common base and to show where the noncommutativity will play peculiar roles in them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrusci, V. M., `Phase Semantics and Sequent Calculus for Pure Noncommutative Classical Linear Propositional Logic’, J. Symbolic Logic, 56 (1991), 1403–1451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ackermann, W., ‘Begründung einer Strengen Implikation’, J. Symbolic Logic, 21 (1956), 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D., Jr., Entailment, The Logic of Relevance and Necessity I, Princeton Univ. Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, A. R., Belnap, N. D., Jr., and Dunn, J. M., Entailment, The Logic of Relevance and Necessity II, Princeton Univ. Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bayu Surarso and Ono, H., `Cut Elimination in Noncommutative Substructural Logics’, Reports on Mathematical Logic, 30 (1996), 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Van Benthem, J., Language in Action: Categories, Lambdas and Dynamic Logic, North-Holland, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brady, R. T., `The Gentzenization and Decidability of RW’, J. Philos. Logic, 19 (1990), 35–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brady, R. T., `Gentzenization and Decidability of Some Contraction-Less Relevant Logics’, J. Philos. Logic, 20 (1991), 97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Buszkowski, W., Marciszewski, W., and van Benthem, J. (eds), Categorial Grammar, Benjamins, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Daten, K. and Schroeder-Heister, P. (eds), Substructural Logics, Oxford Univ. Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dunn, J. M., `Relevance Logic and Entailment’, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds), Handbook of Philosophical Logic III, 1986, pp. 117–224.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fine, K., `Models for Entailment’, J. Philos. Logic, 3 (1974), 347–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Iséki, K., `On BCK-Algebras with Condition (S)’, Math. Japonica, 25 (1980), 625–626.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kiriyama, E. and Ono, H., `The Contraction Rule and Decision Problems for Logics without Structural Rules’, Studia Logica, 50 (1991), 299–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Komori, Y., `Syntactical Investigations into BI Logic and BB’I Logic’, Studio Logica, 53 (1994), 397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lambek, J., `The Mathematics of Sentence Structure’, Amer. Math. Monthly, 65 (1958), 154–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ono, H., `Structural Rules and a Logical Hierarchy’, in R. R. Petkov (ed.), Mathematical Logic, Plenum Press, 1990, pp. 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ono, H., `Decidability and Finite Model Property of Substructural Logics’, in J. Ginzburg et al. (eds), The Tbilisi Symposium on Language, Logic and Computation,CSLI Lecture Note, 1998, pp. 263274.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ono, H. and Komori, Y., `Logics without the Contraction Rule’, J. Symbolic Logic,50 (1985), 169201.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Salomaa, A., Jewels of Formal Language Theory, Computer Science Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Trigg, R, Hindley, J. R., and Bunder, M. W., `Combinatory Abstraction using B, B’ and Friends’, Theoret. Comput. Sci., 135 (1994), 405–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Urquhart, A., `The Undecidability of Entailment and Relevant Implication’, J. Symbolic Logic, 49 (1984), 1059–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yetter, D. N., `Quantales and (Noncommutative) Linear Logic’, J. Symbolic Logic, 55 (1990), 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ono, H. (1999). Some Observations on Noncommutative Substructural Logics. In: Cantini, A., Casari, E., Minari, P. (eds) Logic and Foundations of Mathematics. Synthese Library, vol 280. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2109-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2109-7_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5201-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2109-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics