Abstract
I am honoured to be invited to reply to Lord Kilbrandon’s paper on duress. The paper contains proposals of the highest interest for reform of the law. It is particularly interesting to hear these proposals from a noble and learned judge who has himself played an important part in the legal debate of the law of England on this topic. The present condition of that law, as he ably illustrates, is a very difficult one to justify. As Lord Kilbrandon modestly refuses to dwell on the judgements in which he took part, and as he assumed perhaps a greater familiarity with the cases in question than can be expected of the philosophers among his audience, I would like to spend some time on the present state of the law before considering the pros and cons of each of the proposals for reform.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kenny, A. (1982). Duress Per Minas as a Defence to Crime: II. In: Stewart, M.A. (eds) Law, Morality and Rights. Synthese Library, vol 162. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2049-6_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2049-6_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8379-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2049-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive