Abstract
A recently released newsletter of Climate Action Network, an international environmental pressure group, portrays Kyoto negotiators desperately seeking the truth of carbon uptake by measuring tree volumes in a forest (Singer, S., 1998). Another environmental publication depicts biological sources and sinks as the second largest “loophole” of the Kyoto Protocol, nearly the size of “hot air”, which would lower the actually achieved emission reductions by one-third (Institute for Global Communications, 1998). Yet another environmental release argues that the Kyoto protocol creates “a significant new opportunity to capture the value of biodiversity, carbon storage and other ecosystem services of forests” (Frummhof, P.C. et al., 1998). Opinions couldn’t possibly differ more! Indeed, no other Kyoto issue has met such a mixed reception as the accounting of biological sources and sinks.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ballick, M.J., 1996, Tropical Forest Medical Resources and the Conservation of Biodiversity. Columbia University Press, New York.
Brown, S., Sathaye, J., Cannell, M., Kauppi, P.E., 1996, Management of Forests for Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. in: Watson, R. et al. (eds.), Climate Change 1995–Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses. Contribution of the Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/Mass., p. 775–797.
Brown, P., Kete, N., 1998, Forest and Land Use Projects, in: UNDP (Hrsg.), Issues and Options. The Clean Development Mechanism, New York, 163–173.
Chacon, C., Castro, R., Mack, S., 1998, Pilot Phase Joint Implementation Projects in Costa Rica. A Case Study, Center for International Environmental Law, Washington, D. C. (unpublished).
Chichilnisky, G., 1996a, The economic value of the Earth’s resources. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11 (3): 103–144.
Chichilnisky, G., 1996b, Trade regimes and GATT: resource intensive vs. knowledge intensive growth. Journal of International and Comparative Economics 20: 147181.
Chomitz, K. M., 1998, Baselines for Greenhouse Gas Reductions: Problems, Precedents, Solutions, Paper prepared for the Carbon Offsets Unit of the World Bank (unpublished).
Commonwealth of Australia, 1994, Climate Change. Australia’s national report under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. greenhouse gas inventory, Canberra, From: www.unfccc.de/fccc/natcom/natcom.htm
Dutschke, M., Michaelowa, A., 2000, Climate cooperation as development policy–the case of Costa Rica, International Journal of Sustainable Development 3: 63–94.
Energy Information Agency, 1998, Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol on U.S. Energy Markets and Economic Activity. Released October 9, 1998.
Farhana, Y., 1998, Operational and Institutional Challenges, in: UNDP (Ed.), Issues and Options. The Clean Development Mechanism, New York, p. 53–80.
Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). 1982. FAO Forestry Paper 30. FAO, Rome, Italy.
Flint, E.P., Richards, J.F., 1991, Historical analysis of changes in land use and carbon stock of vegetation in south and southeast Asia. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 21: 91–110.
Frummhoff, P. C., Goetze, D.C., Hardner, J., 1998, Linking Solutions to Climate Change and Biodiversity Loss through the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism, Union of Concerned Scientists Reports 10–1998, Cambridge/Mass..
Fuentes, U., Mund, M., Busch, G., 1998, Die Anrechnung biologischer Quellen und Senken im Kyoto-Protokoll: Risiko für den globalen Umweltschutz. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript (zit. n. WBGU, 1998, Sec. 3. 1 ).
Goldberg, D. M., 1998, Carbon Conservation. Climate Change, Forest and the Clean Development Mechanism, Center for International Environmental Law, Washington, D. C. (unpublished).
Greenpeace, 2000, Should Forests and Other Land Use Change Activities be in the CDM? From: www.greenpeace.org/nclimate/politics/lyonsink.html.
Hastenrath, S., 1985, Climate and Circulation in the Tropics. D. Reidel Publishing, Dordrecht/Holland.
Halsnaes, K., Jaccard, M., Montgomery, W.D., Richels, R., Robinson, J., Shukla, P.R., Sturm, P., 1996. A Review of Mitigation Cost Studies. In: Bruce, J., Hoesung, L., Haites, E. (Eds.), Climate Change 1995. Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Contribution of WGIII to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/Mass., p. 297–366.
Houghton, J.T., Meira Filho, L.G., Callander, B.A., Harris, N., Kattenberg, A., Maskell, K., 1996. Climate Change 1995. The Science of Climate Change. Contribution of WGI to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/Mass..
Hansen, S., 1989, Debt for Nature Swaps–Overview and Discussion of Key Issues, in: Ecological Economics 1: 77–93.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Ed.), 1996, The Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Accounting. From: www.iea.org/ipcc.htm.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Ed.), 2000, IPCC Special Report. Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry. Geneva. From: www.ipcc.ch/pub/SPM_SRLULUCF.pdf
Intergovernmental Forum on Forests of the United Nations Economic and Social Council/ Commission on Sustainable Development (IFF), 1999, Matters left pending on the Need for Financial Resources, Geneva (E/CN.17/IFF/1999/4). From: www.un.org/esa/sustdev/forest/ifd99–4.pdf
Institute for Global Communications (1998), The `L’ Word. From: www.igc.org/climate/eco4_0698.html.
Jepma, C., 1997, On the baseline, in: Joint Implementation Quarterly 3 (2): 1.
Jepma, C.J., Munasinghe, M., 1998, Climate Change Policy. Facts, issues, and analyses, Cambridge/UK.
Michaelowa, A., 1998, Joint Implementation–the baseline issue. Economic and political aspects, in: Global Environmental Change 8 (1): 81–92.
Mulongoy, K.J.; Smith, J, Alirol, P.; Witthoft-Muehlmann, A., 1998, Are Joint Implementation and the Clean Development Mechanism Opportunities for Forest Sustainable Management through Carbon Sequestration Projects? Paper prepared for the Policy Dialogue organized by the International Academy of the Environment and the Center for International Forestry Research in Geneva, 1998, Geneva. From: www.iae.org/pd/forest-background.pdf.
Myers, N., 1992. Future operational monitoring strategy of tropical forests: an alternate strategy. Proceedings from the World Forest Watch Conference. San Jose dos Campos, Brazil. May 27–29, 1992.
Myers, N., 1995, The world’s forests: need for a policy appraisal. Science 268: 823–824.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (eds.), 1995, Global Warming. Economic Dimensions and Policy Responses, Paris.
Pearce, D., B. Day, J. Newcombe, T. Brunello, T. Bello (1998), The Clean Development Mechanism: Benefits of the CDM for developing countries, CSERGE, London/UK.
Rosebrock, J., Sondhof, H., 1991, Debt-for-Nature Swaps: A Review of the First Experiences, in: Intereconomics: 82–87.
Sander, T., 1997, In Asia’s Big Haze, Man Made Battles - Man Made Disaster, Christian Science Monitor (October 28, 1997 ).
Schlamadinger, B., Marland, G., 1998, The Kyoto Protocol: provisions and unresolved issues relevant to land-use change and forestry, Environmental Science and Policy 1: 313–327.
Sedjo, R., Sohngen, B., Jagger, P., 1999, Carbon Sinks in the Post-Kyoto World, in: Weathervane-Feature 50. From: www.weathervan.rff.org/features/feature050.html.
Singer, S., 1998, What do we sink about all this?, in: ECO4 — June 09, 1998. 1–2. From: www.igc.org/climate/eco4_0698.html.
Smith, J.; Mulongoy, K.; Perrson, R.;, Sayer, J., 1998, Harnessing Carbon Markets for tropical Forest Conservation: Towards a More Realistic Assessment, International Academy of the Environment Working Paper, Geneva.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change/Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (UNFCCC/SBSTA), 1998, Methodological Issues. Issues related to land use change and forestry. Note by the secretariat, UNFCCC/SBSTA/ 1998.INF 1.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC, 1995), Report of the Conference of the Parties on its first session, held in Berlin from March 28 to 7 April 1995. Addendum. Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its first session, FCCC/CP/19995/7/Add. 1.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC, 1997 ), Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, FCC C/CP/ 1997/L. 7/Add. l.
Wissenschaftlicher Beirat Globale Umweltveraenderungen (WBGU) (1998), The Accounting of Biological Sinks and Sources Under the Kyoto Protocol — A Step Forwards or Backwards for Global Environmental Protection. From: www.awibremerhaven.de/WGBU/wbgu_sn1998.html
White House, 1998. The Kyoto Protocol and the President’s Policies to Address Climate Change. From: www.whitehouse.gov/WH/New/html/augnew98.html#Kyoto.
World Resources Institute, 1998, Climate, Biodiversity, and Forests: Issues and Opportunities Emerging from the Kyoto-Protocol, Washington D.C. From: www.wri.org/ffi/climate.
Victor, D.G., Nakicenovic, N., Victor, N., 1998. The Kyoto Protocol Carbon Bubble: Implications for Russia, Ukraine and Emission Trading, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, IR-98–094 (forthcoming Climatic Change).
Vine, E.; Sathaye, J., 1997, The Monitoring, Evaluation, Reporting, and Verification of Climate Change Mitigation Projects: Discussion of Issues and Methodologies and Review of Existing Protocols and Guidelines, Report prepared for the U.SEnvironmental Protection Agency, Berkeley (LBNL-40316).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schwarze, R. (2001). Accounting of Biological Sources and Sinks. In: Law and Economics of International Climate Change Policy. Environment & Policy, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2047-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2047-2_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5647-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2047-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive