Skip to main content

Three Definitions of Wisdom

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies Series ((PSSP,volume 67))

Abstract

Three of us at the NEH Institute formulated definitions having to do with wisdom. In this paper, I want to examine these definitions dialectically, exploring both the ways in which they agree and the ways in which they disagree. Where they disagree I shall seek to determine which, if any, provides the best account. My objective is to end up with a definition of wisdom that is maximally satisfactory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. This definition was given to me (in writing) by Lehrer several days after the NEH Institute ended.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ryan’s definition is her refinement of a definition originated by Bruce Russell. Both definitions may be found in Ryan’s paper “What Is Wisdom?” which is included in this anthology.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schopenhauer’s pessimistic philosophy is derived from his (creative) interpretation of Kant and Buddha, especially as these two thinkers influenced his concept of the will. His most systematic development of these ideas may be found in his book, The World As Will And Idea.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See F.M. Cornford’s translation of Plato’s Republic,pages 41-53 and again 301-320.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Lehrer’s Theory of Knowledge,pages 147-151.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Julia Annas, who spoke on Sextus Empiricus’ conception of wisdom at the NEH Institute, describes the goal of scepticism as “the freedom from disturbance with respect to matters of belief and also moderate states with respect to things that are matters of compulsion.”

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Barry Stroud’s interesting discussion of Hume on wisdom, “Hume’s Scepticism: Natural Instincts and Philosophical Reflection,” Philosophical Topics, Vol. 19, No. 1, Spring 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pascal argued in his Pensées and elsewhere that we can’t know whether or not God exists, but that (for pragmatic reasons) we ought to have faith that God exists nonetheless.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garrett, R. (1996). Three Definitions of Wisdom. In: Lehrer, K., Lum, B.J., Slichta, B.A., Smith, N.D. (eds) Knowledge, Teaching and Wisdom. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 67. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2022-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2022-9_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4684-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2022-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics