Abstract
The following is yet another contribution to the vast corpus of Rawlsiana which has grown during the past two decades to reach a size rapidly approaching that of the literature on Kant. But at the same time, it is an attempt to critically examine Rawls’s reading of Kant and to come to some conclusions about Kant’s ethical theory.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971).
J. Rawls, “Kantian Constructivision”, Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980): 515–577.
J. Rawls, “Justice As Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (1985): 223–252.
J. Rawls, “The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 7 (1987): 2–25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heyd, D. (1989). How Kantian Is Rawls’s “Kantian Constructivism”?. In: Yovel, Y. (eds) Kant’s Practical Philosophy Reconsidered. International Archives of the History of Ideas / Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idées, vol 128. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2016-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2016-8_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4054-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2016-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive