Abstract
The nature and function of scientific theories is perhaps the most central problem within the philosophy of science. To study the basic features of theories and their role in scientific inquiry, a philosopher should be able to construe them as entities which he can handle and investigate. It is therefore no wonder that questions concerning the most appropriate ways of reconstructing scientific theories have a crucial importance in discussions about the proper method which philosophers of science should follow.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Achinstein, P.: 1%8, Concepts of Science,Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.
Balzer, W.: 1978, ‘Incommensurability and Reduction’, in Niiniluoto and Tuomela (1978), pp. 313–335. (a)
Balzer, W.: 1978, Empirische Geometrie und Raum-Zeit-Theorie in mengen-theoretischer Darstellung, Kronberg, 1978. (b)
Balzer, W.: 1979, ‘On the Status of Arithmetic’, Erkenntnis 14, 57-85.
Balzer, W.: 1982a, ‘A Logical Reconstruction of Pure Exchange Economics’, Erkenntnis 17, 23–46.
Balzer, W.: 1982b, ‘Empirical Claims in Microeconomics’, in W. Balzer, W. Spohn, and W. Stegmüller (eds.), Philosophy of Economics, Springer, Berlin, pp. 16–40.
Balzer, W.: 1983, ‘Theory and Measurement’, Erkenntnis 19, 3–25.
Balzer, W. and Moulines, C.-U.: 1980, ‘On Theoreticity’, Synthese 44, 467–494.
Balzer, W. and Sneed, J.: 1977, ‘Generalized Net Structures of Empirical Theories, I’, Studia Logica 36, 195–211.
Balzer, W. and Sneed, J.: 1978, ‘Generalized Net Structures of Empirical Theories, Part II’, Studia Logica 37, 167–194.
Beatty, J.: 1980, ‘Optimal Design Models and the Strategy of Model Building in Evolutionary Biology’, Philosophy of Science 47, 532–561.
Benthem, J. van: 1978, ‘Ramsey Eliminability’, Studia Logica 37, 321–336.
Beth, E., `Semantics of Physical Theories’, in H. Freudenthal (ed.), The Concept and the Role of the Model in Mathematics and Natural and Social Sciences, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1961, pp. 48–51.
Bogdan, R.J. (ed.): 1976, Local Induction, Reidel, Dordrecht
Butts, R.E. and Hintikka, J. (eds.): 1977, Historical and Philosophical Dimensions of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Carnap, R.: 1971, ‘A Basic System of Inductive Logic’, in R. Carnap and R.C. Jeffrey (eds.), Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Vol. 1, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 35–165.
Church, A.: 1956, Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Diederich, W.: 1981, Strukturalistische Rekonstruktionen, Fried. Vieweg and Sohn, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden.
Diederich, W.: 1982, ‘Stegmüller on the Structuralist Approach in the Philosophy of Science’, Erkenntnis 17, 377–398.
Diederich, W. and Fulda, H.F.: 1978, ‘Sneed’sche Strukturen in Marx’ »Kapital»’, Neue Hefte fürPhilosophie 13, 47–80.
Duhem, P.: 1954, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Feyerabend, P.: 1977, Review of Stegmüller (1973), The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28, 351–369.
Fraassen, B. van: 1970, ‘On the Extension of Beth’s Semantics of Physical Theories’, Philosophy of Science 37, 325–339.
Frege, G., Begriffschrift (1879). English transi. in J. van Heijenoort (ed.): 1967. From Frege to Gödel: A Sourcebook in Mathematical Logic 1879–1931,Harvard University Press, Harvard.
Giedymin, J.: 1971, `The Paradox of Meaning Variance’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 22 30–48.
Giedymin, J.: 1980, ‘Hamilton’s Method in Geometrical Optics and Ramsey’s View of Theories’, in D.H. Mellor (ed.), Prospects for Pragmatism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Girill, T.R.: 1973, ‘The Logic of Scientific Puzzles’, Zeitschrift fir allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 4, 25–40.
Glymour, C.: 1980, Theory and Evidence,Princeton University Press, Princeton. Händler, E.: 1980, ‘The Logical Structure of Modern Neoclassical Static Microeconomic Equilibrium Theory’, Erkenntnis 15,33–53. (a)
Händler, E.: 1980, ‘The Role of Utility and of Statistical Concepts in Empirical Economic Theories: The Empirical Claims of the Systems of Aggregate Market Supply and Demand Functions Approach’, Erkenntnis 15, 129–157. (b)
Händler, E.: 1982, ‘The Evolution of Economic Theories. A Formal Approach’, Erkenntnis 18, 65–96.
Harris, J.H.: 1978, ‘A Semantical Alternative to the Sneed-Stegmüller-Kuhn Conception of Scientific Theories’, in Niiniluoto and Tuomela ( 1978 ), pp. 184–204.
Hartkämper, A. and Schmidt, H.J. (eds.): 1981, Structure and Approximation in Physical Theories, Plenum Press, New York and London.
Heidelberger, M.: 1980, ‘Towards a Logical Reconstruction of Revolutionary Change: The Case of Ohm as an Example’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 11, 103–122.
Hempel, C.G.: 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press, New York. Hempel, C.G.: 1970, ‘On the “Standard Conception” of Scientific Theories’, in M. Radner and S. Winokur (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IV. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 142–163.
Hesse, M.: 1974, The Structure of Scientific Inference, Macmillan, London.
Hintikka, J. and Tuomela, R.: 1970, ‘Towards a General Theory of Auxiliary Concepts and Definability in First-Order Theories’, in J. Hintikka and P. Suppes (eds.), Information and Inference, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 298–330.
Hintikka, J., Gruender, D. and Agazzi, E. (eds.): 1981, Proceedings of the 1978 Pisa Conference on the History and Philosophy of Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Kamlah, A.: 1976, ‘An Improved Definition of “Theoretical in a Given Theory” ’,Erkenntnis 10, 349–359.
Kleiner, S.: 1970, ‘Erotetic Logic and the Structure of Scientific Revolution’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 21, pp. 149–165.
Koster, J. and Schoten, E.: 1982, ‘The Logical Structure of Rhythmics’, Erkenntnis 18, 269–281.
Krajewski, W.: 1977, Correspondence Principle and the Growth of Knowledge, Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston.
Kuhn, T.S.: 1%2, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2nd ed. 1970.
Kuhn, T.S.: 1974, ‘Second Thoughts on Paradigms’, in Suppe (1974), pp. 459–482. Kuhn, T.S.: 1976, Theory-Change as Structure Change: Comments on the Sneed Formalism’, Erkenntnis 10, 179–199. (Also in Butts and Hintikka, 1977, pp. 289–309.)
Lakatos, I.: 1970, ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 91–195.
Laudan, L.: 1977, Progress and Its Problems,Routledge and Kegan Paul, London. Lehrer, K.: 1977, ‘Social Information’, Monist 60.
Levi, I.: 1976, ‘Acceptance Revisited’, in Bogdan pp. 1–71.
Mayr, D.: 1976, ‘Investigations of the Concept of Reduction, I’, Erkenntnis 10, 275–294.
Mayr, D.: 1981, ‘Investigations of the Concept of Reduction II’, Erkenntnis 16, 109130.
Montague, R.: 1%1, R.: 1%1, `Deterministic Theories’, in R. Washburne (ed.), Decisions, Values, and Groups, II, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 325–370.
Moulines, C.-U.: 1975, Review of Sneed (1971), Erkenntnis 9, 423–436. [1975a.] Moulines, C.-U.: 1975, ‘A Logical Reconstruction of Simple Equilibrium Thermodynamics’, Erkenntnis 9, 101–130. [1975b.]
Moulines, C.-U.: 1976, `Approximate Application of Empirical Theories: A General Explication’, Erkenntnis 10, 201–227.
Moulines, C.-U.: 1979, ‘Theory-Nets and the Dynamics of Theories: The Example of Newtonian Mechanics’, Synthese 41, 417–439.
Moulines, C.-U.: 1980, ‘Intertheoretic Approximation: The Kepler-Newton Case’, Synthese 45, 387–412.
Moulines, C.-U.: 1981, ‘An Example of a Theory-Frame: Equilibrium Thermodynamics’, in Hintikka et al. (1981), vol. II, pp. 211–238.
Moulines, C.U. and Sneed, J.: ‘Suppes’ Philosophy of Physics’, in R.J. Bogdan (ed.), Patrick Suppes, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979, pp. 59–91.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1976, `Inquiries, Problems, and Questions: Remarks on Local Induction’, in Bogdan, pp. 263–296.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1977, `On the Truthlikeness of Generalizations’, in R.E. Butts and J. Hintikka (eds.), Basic Problems of Methodology and Linguistics, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 121–147.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1978a, ‘Notes on Popper as Follower of Whewell and Peirce’, Ajatus 37, 272–327.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1978b, ‘Truthlikeness: Comments on Recent Discussion’, Synthese 38, pp. 281–329.
Niiniluoto, I.: 1978c, ‘Verisimilitude, Theory-Change, and Scientific Progress’, in Niiniluoto and Tuomela ( 1978 ), pp. 243–264.
Niiniluoto, I. and Tuomela, R.: 1973, Theoretical Concepts and Hypothetico-Inductive Inference, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Niiniluoto, I. and Tuomela, R. (eds.): 1978, The Logic and Epistemology of Scientific Change (Acta Philosophical Fennica 30), North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Nowak, L.: 1975, ‘Relative Truth, the Correspondence Principle and Absolute Truth’, Philosophy of Science 42, 187–202.
Pearce, D.: 1981, ‘Is There Any Theoretical Justification for a Non-statement View of Theories?’, Synthese 46, 1–40. (a)
Pearce, D.: 1981, ‘Comments on a Criterion of Theoreticity’, Synthese 48, 77–86. (b) Pearce, D.: 1982, ‘Logical Properties of the Structuralist Concept of Reduction’, Erkenntnis 18,307–333.
Pearce, D. and Rantala, V.: 1983, ‘New Foundations for Metascience’, Synthese 56 (1983), 1–26.
Poincaré, H.: 1952, Science and Hypothesis, Dover, New York.
Popper, K.R.: 1963, Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London. Przelecki, M.: 1969, The Logic of Empirical Theories, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Przelecki, M.: 1974, ‘A Set-Theoretic versus a Model Theoretic Approach to the Logical Structure of Physical Theories’, Studia Logica 33, pp. 91–112.
Przelecki, M.: 1978, ‘Commensurable Referents of Incommensurable Terms’, in Niiniluoto and Tuomela ( 1978 ), pp. 347–365.
Przelecki, M. and Wojcicki, R. (eds.): 1977, Twenty-Five Years of Logical Methodology in Poland, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Ramsey, F.P.: 1931, ‘Theories’, in The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays, Kegan Paul, London.
Rantala, V.: 1977, Aspects of Definability (Acta Philosophica Fennica 29 ), North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Rantala, V.: 1978a, The Old and New Logic of Metascience’, Synthese 39, 233–247. Rantala, V.: 1978b, ‘Correspondence and Non-Standard Models: A Case Study’, in Niiniluoto and Tuomela ( 1978 ), pp. 366–378.
Rantala, V.: 1980, ‘On the Logical Basis of the Structuralist Philosophy of Science’, Erkenntnis 15, 269–286.
Sadovsky, V.N.: 1981, ‘Logic and the Theory of Scientific Change’, in Hintikka et al. (1981), vol. 1, pp. 49–62.
Scheibe, E.: 1973, The Logical Analysis of Quantum Mechanics, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Scheibe, E.: 1976, ‘Conditions of Progress and the Comparability of Theories’, in R.S.
Cohen et al. (eds.), Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos,Reidel, Dordrecht.
Scheibe, E.: 1978, ‘On the Structure of Physical Theories’, in Niiniluoto and Tuomela ( 1978 ), pp. 205–224.
Sellars, W.: 1963, Science, Perception and Reality, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London. Shapere, D.: 1974, `Scientific Theories and Their Domains’, in Suppe (1974), pp. 518–570. Simon, H.A.: 1977, Models ‘of Discovery, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Sneed, J.: 1971, The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics,Reidel, Dordrecht. Sneed, J., 1976, `Philosophical Problems in the Empirical Science of Science: A Formal
Approach’, Erkenntnis 10,pp. 115–146. (Also in Butts and Hintikka, 1977, pp. 245–268.)
Sneed, J.: 1978, ‘Invariance Principles and Theoretization’, in Niiniluoto and Tuomela ( 1978 ), pp. 130–178.
Sneed, J.: 1979, ‘Introduction’, in The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, 2nd revised edition, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. xvii-xxv.
Sneed, J.: 1981, ‘Comments on Bechler, Niiniluoto and Sadovsky’, in Hintikka et al. (1981), vol. I, pp. 49–62.
Sneed, J.: 1983, ‘Structuralism and Scientific Realism’, Erkenntnis 19, 345–370.
Stegmüller, W.: 1970, Theorie und Erfahrung, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.
Stegmüller, W.: 1973, Theorienstrukturen und Theoriendynamik, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.
Stegmüller, W.: 1974, ‘Theorienstruktur und logisches Verständnis’, in W. Diederich (ed.), Theorien der Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 167–209. English transi. `Logical Understanding and the Dynamics of Theories’, in W. Stegmüller, 1977, Collected Papers, II, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 150–176.
Stegmüller, W.: 1975, `Structures and Dynamics of Theories: Some Reflections on J.D.
Sneed and T.S. Kuhn’, Erkenntnis 9, 75–100. Also in Collected Papers, II, pp. 177–202.
Stegmüller, W.: 1976a, The Structure and Dynamics of Theories, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg-Berlin.
Stegmüller, W.: 1976b, `Accidental (“Non-Substantial”) Theory Change and Theory Dislodgment’, Erkenntnis 10, 147–178. Also in Butts and Hintikka (1977), pp. 269288.
Stegmüller, W.: 1976, `Normale Wissenschaft und wissenschaftliche Revolutionen - Kritische Betrachtungen zur Kontroverse zwischen Karl Popper und Thomas Kuhn’, Wissenschaft und Weltbild 29, 169–180. [1976c.]
Stegmüller, W.: 1978a, ‘A Combined Approach to the Dynamics of Theories’, Theory and Decision 9, 39–75.
Stegmüller, W.: 1978, ‘The Structuralist View: Survey, Recent Developments and Answers to Some Criticisms’, in Niiniluoto and Tuomela (1978), pp. 113–129.
Stegmüller, W.: The Structuralist View of Theories: A Possible Analogue of the Bourbaki Programme in Physical Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1979.
Suppe, F.: 1972, `What’s Wrong with the Received View on the Structure of Scientific Theories’, Philosophy of Science 39, 1–19.
Suppe, F. (ed.): 1974, The Structure of Scientific Theories, The University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Suppes, P.: 1957, Introduction to Logic, Van Nostrand, New York.
Suppes, P.: 1967, `What is a Scientific Theory’, in S. Morgenbesser (ed.), Philosophy of Science Today, Basic Books, New York, pp. 55–67. [1967a.]
Suppes, P.: 1967, Set-Theoretic Structures in Science,mimeographed, Stanford University, Stanford, [1967b.]
Suppes, P.: 1969, Studies in the Methodology and Foundations of Science, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Suszko, R.: 1968, `Formal Logic and the Development of Knowledge’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Problems in the Philosophy of Science, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 210–222.
Swijtink, Z.: 1976, ‘Eliminability in a Cardinal’, Studia Logica 35, 73–89. Thagard, P.: 1982, ‘Hegel, Science, and Set Theory’, Erkenntnis 18, 397–410.
Toulmin, S.: 1972, Human Understanding, Vol. I, Princeton Unviersity Press, Princeton.
Tuomela, R.: 1973, Theoretical Concepts, Springer, Vienna.
Tuomela, R.: 1978a, ‘Scientific Change and Approximation’, in Niiniluoto and Tuomela ( 1978 ), pp. 265–297.
Tuomela, R.: 1978b, `On the Structuralist Approach to the Structure and Dynamics of Theories’, Synthese 39, 211–231.
Törnebohm, H.: 1976, ‘On Piecemeal Knowledge-Formation’, in Bogdan, pp. 297–318. Wojcicki, R.: 1973, ‘Basic Concepts of Formal Methodology of Empirical Sciences’, Ajatus 35, 168–196.
Wojcicki, R.: 1974a, `Set-Theoretic Representations of Empirical Phenomena’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 3, 337–343.
Wojcicki, R., 1974b, `Comments on Przelecki’, Studia Logica 33, 105–107.
Zandvoort, H.: 1982a, ‘Comments on the Notion »Empirical Claim of a Specialization Theory Net» within the Structuralist Conception of Theories’, Erkenntnis 18, 25–38.
Zandvoort, H.: 1982b, ‘An Extension of Sneed’s Reconstruction of Classical Particle Mechanics to Complex Applications, and an Alternative Approach to Special Force Laws’, Erkenntnis 18, 39–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Niiniluoto, I. (1984). The Growth of Theories: Comments on the Structuralist Approach. In: Is Science Progressive?. Synthese Library, vol 177. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1978-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1978-0_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8404-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1978-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive