Skip to main content

How is Philosophy Possible as a Science?

  • Chapter
Is Science Progressive?

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 177))

  • 129 Accesses

Abstract

Philosophy is in many ways an extraordinary discipline. It differs from all other ‘special sciences’ through its history, methods, object and results. The position of philosophy is unique within the system of sciences and more generally within the whole human culture. Immanuel Kant’s famous question — how is philosophy possible as a science? — is a permanently topical theme on which all researchers, teachers, and practitioners of philosophy have to find a personal standpoint.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Hacking, I., ’Is the End in Sight for Epistemology?’, Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980), pp. 579–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I., Critique of Pure Reason, G. Bell and Sons, London, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I., Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Indianapolis, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., ’Rorty on the Possibility of Philosophy’, Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980), pp. 588–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowakova, I. and Nowak, L., ’Marxism and Positivism: The Idea of a Scientific Philosophy’, Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 4 (1978), pp. 210–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R., ’Introduction: Metaphilosophical Difficulties of Linguistic Philosophy’, in R. Rorty (ed.), The Linguistic Turn: Recent Essays in Philosophical Method, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R., Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Blackwell, Oxford, 1980. Windelband, W., Die Geschichte der neueren Philosophie I–II, Vierte Auflage, von Breitkopf & Härtel, Leipzig, 1907.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Niiniluoto, I. (1984). How is Philosophy Possible as a Science?. In: Is Science Progressive?. Synthese Library, vol 177. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1978-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1978-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8404-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1978-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics