Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 14))

  • 140 Accesses

Abstract

Is death ever preferable to life? Asking that question may say something about a society needing to define its priorities so that individuals have some ground rules for how we are expected to live together in that society. The question may also represent an individual’s quest to determine how high a value he will put upon life, both in terms of his own life and other peoples lives for which he may be given responsibility by society. An example is when a duty of care is established between a doctor and a patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Endnotes

  1. Rachels J. The Elements of Moral Philosophy. Random House, New York. 1986, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gervais KG. Redefining Death. Yale University Press, New Haven 1986, 44.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fletcher J. Indications of humanhood: A tentative profile of man. The Hastings Centre Report, 1972; 2 (5): 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Devine P. The Ethics of Homicide. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame 1990, 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christman J. Autonomy and Personal History. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 1991; 21: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miller BL. Autonomy and the refusal of life saving treatment. The Hastings Centre Report, August 1981: 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Young R, Personal Autonomy. Croom Helm, London, 1986, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Walton D. Slippery Slope Arguments. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992, 1–206.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Strosberg MA, Wiener JM, Baker R, Fein IA eds. Rationing America’s Medical Care: The Oregon Plan and Beyond. The Brookings Institute, Washington D.C., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Olver, I.N. (2002). In the Beginning. In: Is Death Ever Preferable to Life?. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1976-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1976-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6178-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1976-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics