Abstract
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Assessment (IEA) has conducted two comparative studies of mathematics education, first in 1967 and again in 1980. These large-scale studies, in which some 25 different countries participated, are important sources of data on student achievement, instructional practices, curricular emphases, and other indicators of the effectiveness of various educational systems. Such studies also provide information on the relative achievement of the participating countries and can serve as efficient mechanisms for monitoring international progress.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Angoff, W.N. & Ford, S.F.: 1973, ‘Item-race interaction on a test of scholastic aptitude’, Journal of Educational Measurement, 10, 95–105.
Hoover, H.D. & Kolen, M.J.: 1984, ‘The reliability of six item bias indices’, Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 173–181.
Linn, R.L., Levine, M.V., Hastings, C.N. & Wardrop, J.L.: 1981, ‘Item bias in a test of reading comprehension’, Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 159–173.
Simon, M.G.: 1987, Statistical and subjective bias analyses of translated educationalachievement items,unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hanna, G. (1993). The Validity of International Performance Comparisons. In: Niss, M. (eds) Investigations into Assessment in Mathematics Education. New ICMI Study Series, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1974-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1974-2_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4232-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1974-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive