Skip to main content

Geography Curriculum Planning in Evolution: Some Historical and International Perspectives

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: The GeoJournal Library ((GEJL,volume 73))

Abstract

Curriculum planning procedures in one form or another can be traced back over a long period. It has had wide ramifications, range in its scope from the imposition of curricula at the national level to detailed lesson planning. It has ranged from a type of planning that was at best rudimentary and rigid; to one that remained rigid and restrictive in intent, though became much broader in scale; to the more sophisticated and ‘scientific’ or rational curriculum planning. It must be stressed that these patterns have not simply followed each other in historical sequence but have to an extent co-existed. Through the various patterns of planning there has been both continuity and change in international geography curricula. Whatever the pattern, a contention of this paper is that curriculum planning has rarely been well-balanced as between the three vital components of matter or content; method or process; and mission, or social purposes. In one way or another, and for different reasons, one or two of these facets have been allowed to dominate. Within the short space available cameos of curriculum planning at different times and in different places will illustrate connections between the past and the present situation. These examples will be international in scope, though inevitably the majority are taken from the English-speaking world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anon. (1902) Object lesson: a volcano. The Teachers’ Times and Kinder-garten Gazette. 13 June, 12–13. Anon. (1938) Education in Nazi Germany, London: Kulturkampf Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednarz, R., Bednarz, S. and Stoltman, J. (1998) The analysis of geography materials: criteria, systematic review, and consequences, in M. Ferreira, A. Neto and C. Sarmento (eds.), Culture, Geography and Geographical Education, Vol. 1, International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education, Oporto, pp. 31–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednarz, S. (2000) Geography education research, Journal of Geography 1988–1997, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 9, 128–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, D.S. (1982) Course planning in geography, in N.J. Graves (ed.), New UNESCO Source Book for Geography Teaching, Paris: Longman/UNESCO, pp. 272–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings, N. (1929) A Determination of Generalizations Basic to a Social Studies Curriculum, Baltimore: Warwick and York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1963) The Process of Education, New York: Random House, Vintage Books Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B. (1973) Curriculum process in the development of geography courses in secondary schools, in D. Biddle and C. Deer (eds.), Readings in Geographical Education: Selections from Australian and New Zealand Source, Vol. 2, 1966–1972, Whitcombe and Tombs/Australian Geography Teachers’ Association, Melbourne, pp. 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremin, L. (1971) Curriculum-making in the United States, Teachers College Record, 73, 207–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. (1990) `Textbooks and the curriculum in the postwar era: 1950–1980, (1990), in D.L. Elliott and A. Woodward (eds.), Textbooks and Schooling in the United States: 89th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fien, J. (1984) School based curriculum development in geography, in J. Fien, R. Gerber and P. Wilson (eds.), The Geography Teacher ‘s Guide to the Classroom, Australia, South Melbourne: Macmillan, pp. 235–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fien, J. (1992) Education for peace through geography, in M. Naish (ed.), Geography and Education: National and International Perspectives, London: University of London Institute of Education, pp. 114–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fien, J. (2000) Listening to the voice of youth: Implications for educational reform, in D. Yencken, J. Fien and H. Sykes (eds.) Environment, Education and Society in the Asia-Pacific: Local Traditions and Global Discourses, London: Routledge, pp. 250–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, T. (1998) Developing as a Teacher of Geography, Cambridge: Chris Kington Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, F. (1979) America Revised: History Schoolbooks in the Twentieth Century, Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geipel, R. (1978) The aims and organisation of the RCFP in the federal German republic, in N. Graves (ed.), Geographical Education: Curriculum Problems on Certain European Countries with Special Reference to the 1619 Age Group,International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education, University of London Institute of Education, London, pp. 74–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, R. and Lidstone, J. (eds.) (1996) Developments and Directions in Geographical Education, Clevedon: Channel View Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, N. (1975) Geography in Education, London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, N. (1979) Curriculum Planning in Geography, London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, N. (1996) Curriculum development in geography: An ongoing process, in A. Kent, D. Lambert, M. Naish and F. Slater (eds.), Geography in Education: Viewpoints on Teaching and Learning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 72–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosvenor, G. (1995) In sight of the tunnel: The renaissance of geography education’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85, 409–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, A. (1971) Geography in an urban age, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 3, 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. (1982) The rhetoric of school-centred innovation, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 14, 251–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helburn, N. (1983) Reflections on the high school geography project, in J. Huckle (ed.), Geographical Education: Reflection and Action, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 20–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heske, H. (1991) The entanglement of geography and politics: geographical education under National Socialism, Internationale Schulbuchforschung, 13, 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckle, J. (1983) The politics of school geography, in J. Huckle (ed.), Geographical Education: Reflection and Action, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamenetsky, C. (1984) Children’s Literature in Hitler’s Germany, Athens, Oh.: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, D. (1988) Ideology and school-centred innovation: a case study and a critique’, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20, 449–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, C. (1973) The high school geography project as a teacher training resource, in D. Biddle and C. Deer (eds.), Readings in Geographical Education: Selections from Australian and New Zealand Source, Vol. 2, 1966–1972, Whitcombe and Tombs/Australian Geography Teachers’ Association, Melbourne, pp. 432–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D. and Balderstone, D. (2000) Learning to Teach Geography in the Secondary School: A Companion to School Experience, London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liiber, U. (2000) Geography teaching in the Baltic States, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 9, 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liiber, U. and Roosaare, J. (2000) The new role of geography and the consequent requirements for a new curriculum in Estonia, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 9, 266–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maksakovsky, V. (1986) Social tasks of the society and the changes in school geography education, in A. Hernando (ed.), Geographical Education and Society, International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education Proceedings, Sitges, pp. 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maksakovsky, V. (1995) Modern problems of school geography in Russia, in J. Lidstone, E. Romanova and A. Kondakov, A. (eds.), Global Change and Geographical Education, International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education Proceedings, Moscow, pp. 107–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoll, P. (1984) Selecting resources for geography teaching, in J. Fien, R. Gerber and P. Wilson (eds.), The Geography Teacher’s Guide to the Classroom, South Melbourne: Macmillan Australia, x, pp. 258–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, E. (1939) School for Barbarians: Education under the Nazis,London: Lindsay Drummond. Marsden, B. (1995) Geography 11–16: Rekindling Good Practice,David Fulton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, W. (1976) Evaluating the Geography Curriculum, Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, W. (1980) The West German geography curriculum project: a comparative view, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 12, 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, W. (1992) The 32nd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education on The Teaching of Geography: An external appraisal, in A. Hill (ed.), International Perspectives on Geographic Education, International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education/Rand McNally and Company, Boulder CO/Skokie, IL, pp. 131–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, W. (2001) The School Textbook: Geography, History and Social Studies, London: The Woburn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naish, M. (1978) Answering the challenge: a review of the work of the Schools Council Curriculum Development Project: Geography 16–19, in N.J. Graves (ed.), Geographical Education: Curriculum Problems on Certain European Countries with Special Reference to the 16–19 Age Group, International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education, University of London Institute of Education, London, pp. 188–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naish, M. (1990) Experiences of Centralisation: An International Study of the Impacts of Centralised Education Systems upon Geography Curricula, International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naish, M. (1992) Geography in the secondary curriculum, in M. Naish (ed.), Geography and Education: National and International Perspectives, London: University of London Institute of Education, pp. 34–50

    Google Scholar 

  • National Geographic Society (2000) A Path Toward World Literacy: A Standards-based Guide to K-12 Geography, Washington: National Geographic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. (1992) What goes round comes around: history education in the 1890s and the 1990s, History Teacher, 25, 463–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville, C. (1927) A Study of Outcomes in Education through Geography Teaching, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, D. (1992) Ecological Literacy: Education and the Transition to a Postmodern World, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, L. (1996) The geography teacher as curriculum decision maker: perspectives on reflective practice and professional development, in R. Gerber and J. Lidstone, (eds.) (1996) Developments and Directions in Geographical Education, Clevedon: Channel View Publications, pp. 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawling, E. (2000) national Curriculum geography: new opportunities for curriculumm development, in A. Kent (ed.), Reflective Practice in Geography Teaching, London: Paul Chapman, pp. 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawling, E. (2001) The politics and practicalities of curriculum change 1991–2000: issues arising from a study of school geography in England, British Journal of Educational Studies, 49, 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugg, H. (1926) Three decades of mental discipline: Curriculum-making via National Committees in G. Whipple, (ed.), The Foundations and Technique of Curriculum-Construction: 26th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Parts I and 11, Bloomington: Public School Publishing Company, Ill, Part 1, pp. 33–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, C. (1987) The nature and potential of a Geographic Alliance, Journal of Geography, 86, 211–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltman, J. (1980) Elizabeth Putnam Parker: her role in geographical education in the United States from 1913–1961, in W. Marsden (ed.), Historical Perspectives on Geographical Education, International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education/University of London Institute of Education, pp. 80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taba, H. (1962) Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verduin-Muller, H. (1978) A conceptual model for curriculum planning in geography, in N.J. Graves (ed.), Geographical Education: Curriculum Problems on Certain European Countries with Special Reference to the 1619 Age Group,International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education, University of London Institute of Education, London, pp.7–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verduin-Muller, H. (1984) Information theory and geography education, in H. Haubrich (ed.), Perception of People and Places through Media, Vol.2, International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education, Pädagogische Hochschule Freiburg, Freiburg, pp. 469–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walford, R. (1989) On the frontier with the new model army: Geography publishing from the 1960’s to the 1990’s, Geography, 74, 308–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D. (1967) Curriculum Process, London: University of London Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipple, G. (ed.)(1933) The Teaching of Geography: 32nd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education,Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marsden, B. (2003). Geography Curriculum Planning in Evolution: Some Historical and International Perspectives. In: Gerber, R. (eds) International Handbook on Geographical Education. The GeoJournal Library, vol 73. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1942-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1942-1_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6172-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1942-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics