Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Relative Efficiency of Public versus Private Municipal Bus Firms: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis

  • Chapter
International Applications of Productivity and Efficiency Analysis

  • 169 Accesses

Abstract

This article has employed the data envelopment analysis method to evaluate the efficiency of the five bus firms in Taipei city. When vehicle kilometers (revenue or the measure combining vehicle kilometers, revenue and the number of traffic trips on routes) was used as the output measure, it concluded that the publicly owned Taipei Municipal Bus had increased (not increased) its technical efficiency after the government liberalized the urban bus market. This article also found that in both the one output (vehicle kilometers) and three outputs cases, Taipei Municipal Bus had, on an average, lower efficiency scores than the private firms, and that while each firm usually employed a linear production technology for several, consecutive years the private firms were more flexible in adopting different technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alchian, A. (1965). “Some economics of property rights.” Politico 30, pp. 816–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, S.E., and R. Halvorsen. (1986). “The relative efficiency of public and private firms in a regulated environment: The case of U.S. electric utilities.” Journal of Public Economics 29, pp. 291–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berechman, J. (1983). “Costs, economies of scale and factor demand in bus transport.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 17, pp. 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessent, A., W. Bessent, J. Elam, and T. Clark. (1988). “Efficiency frontier determination by constrained facet analysis.” Operations Research 36, pp. 785–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, A. and A. Vining. (1989). Ownership and performance in competitive environments: a comparison of the performance of private, mixed and state-owned enterprises. Journal of Law and Economics 32, pp. 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruggink, T.H. (1982). “Public versus regulated private enterprise in the municipal water industry: a comparison of operating costs.” Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 22, pp. 111–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, P., S. Grosskopf, and K. Hayes. (1986). “Efficiency and ownership: further evidence” Review of Economics and Statistics 68, pp. 337–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D.W. and L. R. Christensen. (1980). “The relative efficiency of public and private firms in a competitive environment: the case of Canadian railroads.” Journal of Political Economy 88, pp. 958–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D.W., L.R. Christensen, and W.E. Diewert. (1982). “The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity.” Econometrica 50, pp. 1393–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, K.P. (1987). “Productivity changes in the petroleum and natural gas industry: an international comparison.” Paper presented at 9th Conference of the International Association of Energy Economists, Calgary, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, K.P., and Y.Y. Guh. (1991). “Linear production functions and the data envelopment analysis.” European Journal of Operational Research 52, pp. 21.5–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, K.P. and Y.Y. Guh. (1988). “Functional forms in data envelopment analysis ” Paper presented at the EURO IX and TIMS XXV III Joint International Conference, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. (1978). “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.” European Journal of Operational Research 2, pp. 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, B. Golany, L. Seiford, and J. Stutz. (1985) “Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions.” Journal of Econometrics 30, pp. 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crain, W.M. and A. Zardkoohi. (1978). “A test of the property rights theory of the firm: water utilities in the United States” Journal of Law and Economics 21, pp. 395–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crain, W.M. and A. Zardkoohi. (1980). “Public sector expansion: stagnant technology or attenuated property rights?” Southern Economic Journal 46, pp. 1069–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, D. (1971). “The efficiency of public versus private firms: the case of Australia’s two airlines.” Journal of Law and Economics 14, pp. 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, D. (1977). “Property rights and economic efficiency: the Australian airlines revisited.” Journal of Law and Economics 20, pp. 223–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Alessi, L. (1974). `An economic analysis of government ownership and regulation: theory and the evidence from the electric power industry.“ Public Choice 19, pp. 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Alessi, L. (1977). “Ownership and peak-load pricing in the electric power industry.” Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 17, pp. 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W.E. (1976). “Exact and superlative index numbers.” Journal of Econometrics 4, pp. 115–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W.E. and C. Parkan. (1983). “Linear programming tests of regularity conditions for production functions.” In W. Eichhorn, R. Henn, K. Neumann, and R.W. Shephard (eds.) Quantitative Studies on Production and Prices. Würzburg: Physica Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., R. Grabowski, and S. Grosskopf. (1985). “Technical efficiency of Philippine agriculture.” Applied Economics 17, pp. 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, and C.A.K. Lovell. (1985). The Measurement of Efficiency of Production. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, and J. Logan. (1985). “The relative performance of publicly-owned and privately-owned electric utilities.” Journal of Public Economics 26, pp. 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fire, R. and W. Hunsaker. (1986). “Notions of efficiency and their reference sets.” Management Science 32, pp. 237–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R. and C.A.K. Lovell. (1978). “Measuring the technical efficiency in production.” Journal of Economic Theory 19, pp. 150–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R. and D. Njinkeu. (1989). “Computing returns to scale under alternative models.” Economics Letters 30, pp. 55–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M.J. (1957). “The measurement of productive efficiency.” Journal of Royal Statistical Society 120, series A, part 3, pp. 253–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, S. and R. Teeples. (1983). “Public versus private water delivery: a hedonic cost approach.” Review of Economics and Statistics 65, pp. 672–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, W.A. (1982). “Performance of North American and Australian airlines.” In W. Stanbury and F. Thompson (eds.) Managing Public Enterprises. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, D.W. and Z. Griliches. (1972). “Issues in growth accounting: a reply to Edward E Denison” Survey of Current Business 52, part 2, pp. 65–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junker, J.A. (1975). “Economic performance of public and private utilities: the case of U.S. electric utilities.” Journal of Economics and Business 28, pp. 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, A. and R. Morey. (1981). “Measuring the relative efficiency and output potential for public sector organization: an application of data envelopment analysis.” International Journal of Policy Analysis and Information Systems 5, pp. 267–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H.C. (1986). Costs, Returns to Scale and Productivity: A Case of Taipei Bus System. unpublished M.S. thesis, Department of Economics, National Taiwan Unviersity, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H.S. (1986). Scale Economies of Urban Bus Service. unpublished M.S. thesis, Department of Transportation and Communication Management, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, R.A. and T.N. Van Cott. (1984). “Public versus private economic activity?’ Public Choice 43, pp. 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, P.C. and J.L. Mikesell. (1971). “Tax payments and electric utility prices.” Southern Economic Journal 38, pp. 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R.A. (1975). “Publicly owned versus privately owned utilities: a policy choice” Review of Economics and Statistics 57, pp. 391–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millward, R. (1986). “The comparative performance of public and private ownership.” In J. Kay, C. Mayer, and D. Thompson (eds.) Privatisation and Regulation-the UK Experience. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberg, L.G. (1977). “Two issues in the municipal ownership of electric power distribution systems.” Bell Journal of Economics 8, pp. 303–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obeng, K. (1985). “Bus transit cost, productivity, and factor substitution.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 19, pp. 183–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashigian, B.P. (1976). “Consequences and causes of public ownership of urban transit facilities.” Journal of Political Economy 84, pp. 1239–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1971). “Pricing in public and private enterprises: electric utilities in the United States.” Journal of Law and Economics 14, pp. 109–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pescatrice, D.R. and J.M. Trapani, III. (1980). “The performance and objectives of public and private utilities operating in the United States.” Journal of Public Economics 13, pp. 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryke, R. (1986). “The comparative performance of public and private enterprise.” In J. Kay, C. Mayer, and D. Thompson (eds.) Privatisation and Regulation—the UK Experience. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R.R. (1990). “Continuity of measures of technical efficiency.” Journal of Economic Theory 51, pp. 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. and N.J. Castellan, Jr. (1988). Nonparametric Statistics: For the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spady R. and A. Friedlaender. (1978). “Hedonic cost functions for the regulated trucking industry.” Bell Journal of Economics 9, pp. 159–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, R.E. (1989). ADBASE operating manual, Department of Management Science and Technology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R.G., L.N. Langemeier, C.T. Lee, E. Lee, and R.M. Thrall. (1990). “The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming.” Journal of Econometrics 46, pp. 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. and A. Dalal. (1981) “Estimation of the elasticities of factor substitution in urban bus transportation: a cost function approach.” Journal of Regional Science 21, pp. 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, National Tsing Hua University, Kuang Fu Rd., Hsinchu 300, Taiwan, R.O.C.

    Kuo-Ping Chang & Pei-Hua Kao

Authors
  1. Kuo-Ping Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pei-Hua Kao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Thomas R. Gulledge Jr. C. A. Knox Lovell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chang, KP., Kao, PH. (1992). The Relative Efficiency of Public versus Private Municipal Bus Firms: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis. In: Gulledge, T.R., Lovell, C.A.K. (eds) International Applications of Productivity and Efficiency Analysis. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1923-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1923-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5793-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1923-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation