Hypertrophic phytoplankton and the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis

Abstract

The provisions of Connell’s Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis (IDH) were investigated in relation to the behaviour of freshwater phytoplankton in a hypertrophic lagoon, paying special attention to the link between species-diversity and environmental disturbances. Phytoplankton diversity yielded different indices depending on the basic unit of calculations (cells, particles, phytoplankton units, biomass). Although their ranges were approximately equal, they did not covary so could not be considered mutually substitutable. For the purpose of IDH testing, biomass diversity was chosen.

Equilibrium states were considered to obtain in those periods with a very high fraction of total phytoplankton biomass, shared by no more than three phytoplankton species. Disturbances were considered as counterparts of equilibrium states. Disturbance factors were mostly abiotic, environmental features of the lake operating on the phytoplankton community at different time scales (co-occurring and with 1- and 2-weeks’ lags). These scales may relate to the time required to establish phytoplankton community structure.

IDH could be suspected not to hold for the phytoplankton of this hypertrophic lake, which experienced seven near-equilibrium phases and six disturbance periods throughout the study. As a rule, equilibrium states lasted longer than disturbance periods. The expected relationships between both disturbance intensity or frequency were not shown. Furthermore, no relationship was demonstrated between diversity (and hence IDH) and the phytoplankton community change rate. Wind stress probably played a minor role in triggering disturbance events. Disturbances were shown partly to promote small-sized phytoplankton communities.

Finally, a plea for studying hypertrophic phytoplankton in greater detail is stressed if its responses to disturbances are to be fully understood.