Multi-Use Conflicts in Inshore Waters

  • Rob van Ginkel
  • Nathalie Steins
Part of the Reviews: Methods and Technologies in Fish Biology and Fisheries book series (REME, volume 2)


Until only quite recently, human activity in Europe’s inshore waters made little impact on marine resources and one activity scarcely interfered with any other. But long term developments such as demographic growth, urbanisation, expanding demand for food and natural resources, the integration of resources into markets, technological innovation, the development of marine transport and the rise of tourism have all increased the level of human impact on coastal areas and resources. Once a domain where only fishers and sailors ventured, the sea is now being used for many other purposes, particularly in the inshore zone. In addition to their continuing importance for fisheries, inshore waters are now commonly used quite intensively for other potentially intrusive activities. The public’s growing demand for entry to the inshore zone has brought about competition and conflicts between various claimants over access to, allocation of and control over coastal space and resources. In addition to multiple use conflicts, intensified use of the coastal zone can also exacerbate resource management problems. Human activities unrelated to fisheries affect marine ecosystems: mineral exploration and development, water based recreation, navigation, dredging, land reclamation, industrial and agricultural waste disposal including the discharge of effluents and the dumping of toxic chemical and nuclear waste, thermal pollution from coastal power stations etc.


Dispute Resolution Fishing Ground International Maritime Organisation Common Pool Resource Salmon Farming 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acheson, J.M. (1988) Patterns of gear changes in the Maine fishing industry. Some implications for management, Maritime Anthropological Studies, 1 (1), 49–65.Google Scholar
  2. Bantry Bay Charter (1997) Bantry Bay Charter, Issue 1,November,1997.Google Scholar
  3. Centre for Dispute Resolution (1998) Progress Report 1 on the Consensus Building Programme for Bantry Bay Project, Centre for Dispute Resolution, Dublin.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, R.B. (1975) Introduction, in M.M. Sibthorp (ed.), The North Sea. Challenge and Opportunity, Europa Publications, London, pp. ix-xiii.Google Scholar
  5. Collet, S. (1996) Leviathan management or customary administration: the search for new institutional arrangements, in K. Crean and D. Symes (eds.), Fisheries Management in Crisis, Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 99–109.Google Scholar
  6. Delbos, G. and Prémel, G. (1996) The Breton fishing crisis of the 1990s: local society in the throes of enforced change, in K. Crean and D. Symes (eds.), Fisheries Management in Crisis, Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 129–140.Google Scholar
  7. Dufour, A-H. (1996) Management and practice in the small-scale inshore fisheries of the French Mediterranean, in K. Crean and D. Symes (eds.), Fisheries Management in Crisis, Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 110–115.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, V.M. and Steins, N.A. (1998) Developing an analytical framework for multiple-use commons, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10 (3), 347–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farrugio, H. and Le Cone, G. (1991) Recherche halieutique et pêches artisanales interactives en Méditerranée française, in J.R. Durand, J. Lemoalle and J. Weber (eds.), La Recherche Face à la Pêche Artisanale, Editions de l’ORSTOM, Paris, pp. 349–355.Google Scholar
  10. Fingleton, P. and McCann, S. (1996) The use and regulation of coastal resources. Traditional structures and modem national and EU overlays in Western Ireland, MARE Working Paper No. 7, Aarhus University, Aarhus.Google Scholar
  11. Frangoudes, K. (1995) Changing fisheries management institutions in the French Mediterranean, MARE Working Paper No. 4, Aarhus University, Aarhus.Google Scholar
  12. Frangoudes, K. (1996) Fishermen households and fishing communities in Greece: a case study of Nea Michaniona, in K. Crean and D. Symes (eds.), Fisheries Management in Crisis, Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 119–128.Google Scholar
  13. Glaeser, B. and Piriz, L. (1996) Sustainable coastal zone management. Competing interests and conflict resolution in Sweden. Paper presented at On Northern Shores and Islands, International Nordic Conference in Human Ecology, Strömstad (Sweden), 16–18 August 1996.Google Scholar
  14. Grant, J.P. (1978) The conflict between the fishing and oil industries in the North Sea. A case study, Ocean Management, 4, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. House, J.D. (ed.) (1986) Fish Versus Oil: Resources and Rural Development in North Atlantic Societies, ISER, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s.Google Scholar
  16. International Maritime Organisation (1998) Preventing Marine Pollution, 19 March 1998, IMO, London.Google Scholar
  17. Jentoft, S. and Kristoffersen, T. (1989) Fishermen’s co-management: the case of the Lofoten fishery, Human Organization, 48 (4), 355 - -365.Google Scholar
  18. Jorion, P. (1978) Marks and rabbit furs: location and sharing of grounds in coastal fishing, Peasant Studies, 7 (2), 86 - -100.Google Scholar
  19. Just, R. (1995) The Meganisiot fishing system. equity and self-interest, in S. Damianakos (ed.), Brothers and Others. Essays in Honour of John Peristiany, EKKE, Athens, pp. 241–252.Google Scholar
  20. Mondardini Morelli, G. (1998) Traditional use rights in the small-scale fisheries and marine protected areas between Sardinia and Corsica, in D. Symes (ed.), Property Rights and Regulatory Systems in Fisheries, Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 188–200.Google Scholar
  21. Mondardini Morelli, G. (1999) Fishery and tourism in the Mediterranean: the case of Sardinia, in D. Symes (ed.), Europe’s Southern Waters: Management Issues and Practice, Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 78–87.Google Scholar
  22. Ridler, N.B. (1997) Rural development in the context of conflictual resource use, Journal of Rural Studies, 13 (1), 65–73.Google Scholar
  23. Röling, N.G. and Wagemakers, M.A.E. (1998) Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture: Participatory Learning and Adaptive Management in Times of Environmental Uncertainty, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Sandberg, A. (1996) Use and protection of coastal resources, MARE Working Paper No. 7, Aarhus University, Aarhus.Google Scholar
  25. Sibthorp, M.M. (ed.) (1975) The North Sea. Challenge and Opportunity, Europa Publications, London.Google Scholar
  26. Steins, N.A. (1998) We have to keep the foreigners out of our bay: top-down regulations and the strategic response of Irish fishermen, in D. Symes (ed.), Property Rights and Regulatory Systems in Fisheries, Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 216–229.Google Scholar
  27. Steins, N.A. and Edwards, V.E. (1999) Platforms for collective action in multiple-use common pool resources, Agriculture and Human Values, 16 (3), 241 — 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Svelte, M., Aarefjord, H., Heir, H.T. and Overland, S. (1997) Assessment Report on Fisheries and Fisheries related Species and Habitats Issues, Ministry of the Environment, Oslo.Google Scholar
  29. Symes, D. (1996) Co-governance in marine and coastal fisheries, in Proceedings of the Seminar on Co-Management ‘Co-operation in Management to the North Sea and Wadden Sea’, Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Conservation and Fisheries, Fisheries Directorate, The Hague.Google Scholar
  30. Taylor, L.J. (1981) `Man the fisher’: salmon farming and the expression of community in an Irish settlement, American Ethnologist,8 (4), 774–788.Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, L.J. (1987) `The river would run red with blood’: community and common property in an Irish fishing settlement, in B.J. McCay and J.M. Acheson (eds.), The Question of the Commons. The Culture and Ecology of Communal Resources, The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 290–307.Google Scholar
  32. van Ginkel, R. (1991) The sea of bitterness: political process and ideology in a Dutch maritime community, Man N.S., 26 (4), 691–707.Google Scholar
  33. van Hoorn, H., Peet, G. and Tiel, M. (eds.) (1980) The North Sea and its Environment. Uses and Conflicts, North Sea Working Group, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rob van Ginkel
  • Nathalie Steins

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations