Advertisement

Inshore Fisheries, Marine Wildlife Conservation and an Ecosystem Based Approach to Management

  • David Symes
Part of the Reviews: Methods and Technologies in Fish Biology and Fisheries book series (REME, volume 2)

Abstract

The inshore waters fringing the coastlines of Europe contain some of the most highly diverse marine ecosystems, in which man has evolved as the dominant species — a dynamic and disruptive predator. Concern has been growing for the quality of the marine environment and, in line with the ethos of the Biodiversity Convention (1992), the political rhetoric is switching its emphasis away from problems of fish stock sustainability per se to the wider and much more complex issues of ecosystem management and endorsement of the precautionary principle. As the longest established, most widespread and possibly most pervasive of human activities in these inshore waters, fishing has come under increasingly close scrutiny. Although initial attention was focused on the highly damaging effects of pollution in areas like the North Sea, the intensification of fishing effort, the development of new and more efficient technologies which seek to maintain yields even in the face of declining fish stocks, and the growth of industrialised forms of fishing have prompted the realisation that a good part of the ecological change is due to the persistence of fishing activity. Indeed, there is a general presumption that most, if not all, forms of fishing activity damage the marine ecosystem.

Keywords

Fishery Management Precautionary Principle Fishing Activity Ecosystem Approach Harbour Porpoise 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dunn, E. (1998) The impact of fisheries on sea birds in the North Sea, in D. Symes (ed.), Northern Waters: Management Issues and Practice, Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 208 - 215.Google Scholar
  2. Dunn, E. and Goodland, J. (2000) The Shetland sanded fishery: consensus rather than conflict, in L. Heaps (ed.), Ecosystem Approach and Integrating Environmental Considerations into EU Fisheries Policy, Report of Workshop held at Vilanova i la Geltris, 18-19 May, 2000, WWP, London, pp. 34 - 36.Google Scholar
  3. Food and Agriculture Organisation (1995) Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries, FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  4. Fowler, S.L. (1992) Survey of Bait Collection in Britain, JNCC Report no. 107, Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough.Google Scholar
  5. Garrod, D.J. (1997) Where do we go now to conserve fish stocks? Paper presented at Greenwich Forum Conference on Rethinking the Common Fisheries Policy - Looking Towards 2002, London, 16 October 1997.Google Scholar
  6. Gislason, H. (1994) Ecosystem effects on fishing activities in the North Sea, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 29, 520 - 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gislason, H. and E. Kirkegaard (1998) Is the industrial fishery in the North Sea sustainable? in D. Symes (ed.), Northern Waters: Management Issues and Practice, Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 195 - 207.Google Scholar
  8. Gubbay, S. (1997) Generic Effects of Fishing on Natura 2000 Habitats and Species, report to the Joint Nature Conservation Committee, JNCC, Peterborough.Google Scholar
  9. Jennings, S. and M. Kaiser (1998) The effects of fishing on marine ecosystems, Advances in Marine Biology, 34, 201 - 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Larkin, P.A. (1996) Concepts and issues in marine ecosystem management, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 6, 139 - 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. National Marine Fisheries Service (1999) Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management, A Report to Congress by the Ecosystem Principles Advisory Board, Department of Commerce, Washington.Google Scholar
  12. Pope, J. and Symes, D. (2000) An Ecosystem Based Approach to the Common Fisheries Policy: Defining the Goals, English Nature, Peterborough.Google Scholar
  13. Roberts, C. (1998) No-take marine reserves: briefing notes, paper tabled at WWF Workshop on No-Take Zones: The Way Forward, London, 7-8 April 1998.Google Scholar
  14. Svelle, M., Aarefjord, H., Heir, H.T. and Overland, S. (1997) Assessment Report on Fisheries and Fisheries related Species and Habitats Issues, Ministry of the Environment, Oslo.Google Scholar
  15. Symes, D. (1998) Towards 2002: subsidiarity and the regionalization of the Common Fisheries Policy, in T. Gray (ed.), The Politics of Fishing, Macmillan, London, pp. 176 - 193.Google Scholar
  16. Symes, D. and Phillipson, J. (1997) Inshore fisheries management in the UK: Sea Fisheries Committees and the challenge of marine environmental management, Marine Policy 21 (3), 207 - 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Symes, D. and Phillipson, J. (1998) Fishing within limits: inshore fisheries management and the concept of local preference, in D. Symes (ed.), Property Rights and Regulatory Systems in Fisheries, Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 201 - 215.Google Scholar
  18. Symes, D. and Pope, J. (2000) An Ecosystem Based Approach to the Common Fisheries Policy: Achieving the Objectives, English Nature, Peterborough.Google Scholar
  19. Tasker, M. and Fumess, R.W. (1996) Estimation of food consumption by seabirds in the North Sea, in G.L. Hunt and R.W. Fumess (eds.), Seabird/Fish Interactions, with Particular Reference to the North Sea, ICES Cooperative Research Report No. 216, ICES, Copenhagen, pp. 6 - 42.Google Scholar
  20. Vinther, M. (1994) Incidental catch of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in the Danish North Sea gill net fisheries: preliminary results, Scientific Symposium on the 1993 North Sea Quality Status Report, Ebbettoft, Denmark, 18-21 April.Google Scholar
  21. Woodley, T.H. and Read, A.J. (1991) Potential rates of increase of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) population subjected to incidental mortality in commercial fisheries, Canadian Journal of Fish Aquatic Science, 48, 2429 - 2435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Symes

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations