Abstract
The bare bones logicism that dominated philosophy of science in the fifties and sixties has given way to a much richer conception of the way science is created as a cognitive enterprise. Patrick Heelan has been one of the contributors to this enrichment by drawing in to the discussion philosophical traditions other than the orthodox Russellian logicism. Enrichment has come from other sources too. The humanity of scientists is also revealed in the fact that they are social beings, like the rest of humanity. Science is not the work of automata, programmed with something called “scientific method.” Some, having realized the essential role of concepts and linguistic conventions in how we see the world have moved to the other extreme, treating both the world and our knowledge of it as social constructions. We will try to find a point of view which acknowledges the disciple of logic without falling into the paradoxes of logicism and which acknowledges the constructive role of concepts and the influence of the scientific community both on their origins and how they are employed without slipping in the nihilism of post-modernism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
M. Sherif, Attitude and Attitude Change ( Philadelphia: Saunders, 1965 ).
D. G. Gooding, Experiment and the Making of Meaning: Human Agency in Scientific Observation and Experiment ( Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1990 ).
M. Polanyi, Personal Knowledge: Towards a Postcritical Philosophy ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958 ).
For one recent attempt, see R. Harré, “Recovering theExperiment” Philosophy 73 (1998): 353–377.
The safest way to plagiarize a student’s work is to suggest a joint paper with the student as first author. One knows very well that the community knows who is who!
G. J. Holton, Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought ( Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988 ).
L. Feuer, The Scientific Intellectual: The Psychological and Sociological Origins of Modern Science ( New York: Basic Books, 1963 ).
F. M. Moghaddam, The Specialized Society ( Westport, CT: Praeger, 1988 ).
V. Pareto, The Rise and Fall of Elites (Totowa, N.J: Bedminster Press, 1968 ).
For example, B. Latour and S. Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986) and K. Knorr-Cetina, The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextualist Nature of Science (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1981) have pointed more or less directly to the political structure of a scientific community in terms of a hierarchy of social classes.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harré, R. (2002). Science as the Work of a Community. In: Babich, B.E. (eds) Hermeneutic Philosophy of Science, Van Gogh’s Eyes, and God. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 225. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1767-0_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1767-0_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5926-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1767-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive