Abstract
Theories of evidence and theories of knowledge are intimately linked together. And there are many competing theories of evidence. One way to approach them is by way of looking at the theories of knowledge which are their bedrock.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Works on the EVM
M. Edman. Indiciemekanismer. Department of Philosophy, Lund University, Lund 1971.
M. Edman. Adding independent pieces of evidence. In Modality, Morality and Other Problems of Sense and Nonsense, B. Hansson, ed. pp. 180–188. Lund 1973.
P. O. Ekelöf. Beweiswürdigung, Beweislast und Beweis des ersten Ancsheins. Zeitschrift für Zivilprozess, 75, 289–301, 1962.
P. O. Ekelöf. Free evaluation of evidence. ScandinavianStudies in Law, 8, 45–66, 1964.
Ekelöf, 1981] P. O. Ekelöf. Beweiswert. In Festschrift für Fritz Baur,W. Grunsky, et al.,eds. Tübingen, 1981.
R O. Ekelöf. Rättegdng IV, first edition, Stockholm 1963. Fifth edition, Norstedts,Stockholm, 1982.
R. O. Ekelöf. My thoughts on evidentiary value. In Evidentiary Value, R. Gärdenfors et al., eds. pp. 9–26. Library of Theoria, CWK Gleerup, Lund, 1983.
A. Freeling. Belief and Decision-Aiding, Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge 1984.
A. Freeling and N.-E. Sahlin. Combining evidence. In Evidentiary Value, P. Gärdenfors et al.,eds. pp. 58–74. Library of Theoria, CWK Gleerup, Lund, 1983.
R. W. Goldsmith. Studies of a model for evaluating judicial evidence.Acta Psychologica, 45, 211–221, 1980.
R. W. Goldsmith and I. Andersson. Bevisvärdesmetoden versus temametoden vid juridisk bevisvärdering. Tidskrift for Rettsvitenskap, 91, 67–102, 1978.
R. W. Goldsmith and M. Sjöberg. Evaluation of Evidence by Judges and Public Prosecutors, Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, 1979.
R. W. Goldsmith. Evaluating evidence in criminal cases by means of the evidentiary value model. In Evidentiary Value,R Gärdenfors, et al.,eds. pp. 104–114. Library of Theoria, CWK Gleerup, Lund, 1983.
R. Gärdenfors, B. Hansson and N.-E. Sahlin. Evidentiary Value, Library of Theoria, CWK Gleerup, Lund, 1983.
R Gärdenfors. Probabilistic reasoning and evidentiary value. In Evidentiary Value, R Gärdenfors et al.,eds. pp. 44–57. Library of Theoria, CWK Gleerup, Lund, 1983.
S. Halldén. Indiciemekanismer. Tidskrift for Rettsvitenskap, 86, 55–64, 1973.
B. Hansson. Epistemology and evidence. In Evidentiary Value,R. Gärdenfors et al.,eds. pp. 75–97. CWK Gleerup, Lund, 1983
I. Levi. Consonance, dissonance and evidentiary mechanisms. In Evidentiary Value,R. Gärdenfors et al.,eds. pp. 27–43. CWK Gleerup, Lund, 1983
I. Levi. Evidentiary mechanisms and routine expansions. Theoria, 59, 166–177, 1993.
W. Rabinowicz and R. Sliwinski. Some Scandinavian contributions to decision theory: An introduction. In Conceptual Models in Practical Philosophy–ScandinavianContributions, I. Pörn et al.,ed. forthcoming.
N.-E. Sahlin. Do people combine evidence according to an evidentiary value model? In Evidentiary Value,R. Gärdenfors et al.,eds. pp. 98–103. Library of Theoria, CWK Gleerup, Lund, 1983.
N.-E. Sahlin and A. Freeling. Samverkan, motverkan och Dempsters regel: En jämförelse mellan tvä bevisvärdeteorier. Tidskrift for Rettsvitenskap, 5, 503–528, 1983.
N.-E. Sahlin. ‘How to be 100% certain 99.5% of the time’. Journal of Philosophy, 83, 91–111, 1986.
N.-E. Sahlin. On epistemic risk and outcome risk in criminal cases. In In So Many Words, S. Lindström and W. Rabinowicz, eds. pp. 176–186. Uppsala 1989.
A. Stening. Om sammanstallning av bevisfakta och deras bevisvärde. Tidskrift for Rettsvitenskap, 86, 64–85, 1973.
A. Stening. Bevisvärde. Uppsala, 1975.
H. Stenlund. Concurring evidentiary mechanisms: A numerical study. Umeä Studies in the theory and philosophy of science, 9, Limed University, Umeä, 1974.
H. Stenlund. Om motverkande indiciemekanismer. Umeä University, Umeä, 1974.
Other references
J. L. Cohen. The Probable and the Provable, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1977.
B. Davidson and R. Pargetter. Guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 65, 182–187, 1987.
I. Hacking. Combined evidence. In Logical Theory and Semantic Analysis, S. Stenlund, ed. pp. 113–123. Reidel, Dordrecht 1974.
I. Levi. The Enterprise of Knowledge, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1980.
R. Nozick. Philosophical Explanations, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1981.
N.-E. Sahlin. The Philosophy of F. P. Ramsey, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1990.
N.-E. Sahlin. Obtained by a reliable process and always leading to success. Theoria, 57, 132–149, 1991.
G. Shafer. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton university Press, Princeton 1976.
G. Shafer. Non-additive probabilities in the works of Bernoulli and Lambert. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 19, 309–370, 1978.
G. Shafer. Constructive probability, Synthese, 48,1–60, 1981.
P. Smets and R. Kennes. The transferable belief model, Artificial Intelligence, 66, 191–234, 1994.
R. Smets. The axiomatic justification of the transferable belief model. Technical Report: TR/IRIDIA/95–8, IRIDIA, Bruxelles, Belgium, 1995.
I. Todhunter. A History of the Mathematical Theory of Probability,Chelsea Publishing Company, New York, 1865/1965.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sahlin, NE., Rabinowicz, W. (1998). The Evidentiary Value Model. In: Smets, P. (eds) Quantified Representation of Uncertainty and Imprecision. Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1735-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1735-9_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5038-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1735-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive