Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Cellular and Molecular Biology of Plants ((CMBP,volume 2))

Abstract

Fertilization in plants is the culmination of a complex set of processes beginning with the initiation of pollen germination, involving the development of the pollen tube and its interactions with the female sporophyte or gametophyte, and resulting in the production of viable seed. Several mechanisms limit successful fertilization within and between species. The intraspecific mechanisms encourage outcrossing within species, and the interspecific mechanisms affect speciation and limit the exchange of genes between species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahmad, F., Slinkkard, A.E. and Scoles, G.J. (1988) Investigations into the barrier(s) to interspecific hybridization between Cicer arietinum L. and eight other annual Cicer species. Plant Breeding 100: 193–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, R. (1964) Evidence of plasmon differentiation in Lycopersicon. Rpt. Tom. Genet. Coop. 14: 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. and de Winton, D. (1931) The genetic analysis of an unusal relationship between self-sterility and self-fertility in Nicotiana. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 18: 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, P.D. (1976) Self-incompatibility systems in floriculture crops. Acta Hortic. 63: 205–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, P.D. (1986) Incompatibility and incongruity: Two mechanisms preventing gene transfer between taxa. In: D.L. Mulcahy, G.B. Mulcahy and E. Ottaviano (eds.), Biotechnology and Ecology of Pollen, pp. 251–256. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, P.D. and Drewlow, L.W. (1971) Unilateral interspecific incompatibility in Lilium. Yearbook of the North American Lily Society 24: 70–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, P.D. and Peloquin, S.J. (1968) Pollen tube growth and incompatibility following intra-and inter-specific pollinations in Lilium longiflorum. Amer. J. Bot. 55: 1230–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atherton, J.G. and Rudich, J. (eds.) (1986) The Tomato Crop: A Scientific Basis for Improvement. Chapman and Hall Ltd, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayuso, M.C., Baguena, M., Cuartero, J. and Nuez, E. (1987) Possibilities of using the compatible form L. peruvianum PE-23 as a genetic bridge in tomato breeding. Rpt. Tom. Genet. Coop. 37: 36–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A.J. (1943) Specific differences in Petunia. II. Pollen growth. J. Genet. 45: 236–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra, V., Prakash, S. and Shivanna, K.R. (1990) Intergeneric hybridization between Diplotaxis siifolia, a wild species and crop brassicas. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 537–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernatzky, R. and Tanksley, S.D. (1986a) Majority of random cDNA clones correspond to single loci in the tomato genome. Mol. Gen. Genet. 203: 8–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernatzky, R. and Tanksley, S.D. (1986b) Toward a saturated linkage map in tomato based on isozymes and random cDNA sequences. Genetics 112: 887–898.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, T.H. and Stimart, D.P. (1986) Self-incompatibility and interspecific incompatibility: relationships in intra-and interspecific crosses of Zinnia elegans Jacq. and Z. angustifolia HBK (Compositae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 73: 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewbaker, J.L. and Majumder, S.K. (1961) Cultural studies of the pollen population effect and the self-incompatibility inhibition. Am. J. Bot. 48: 457–464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, B.G. (1963) Incompatibility among species of Darwinia. Genetics Today 1: 211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz, J.T., Williams, L.F. and Blakeslee, A.F. (1935) Pollen-tube growth of ten species of Datura in interspecific pollinations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2: 651–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burson, B.L. (1987) Pollen germination, pollen tube growth and fertilization following self and interspecific pollination of Paspalum species. Euphytica 36: 641–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chetelat, R.T. and DeVerna, J.W. (1991) Expression of unilateral incompatibility in pollen of Lycopersicon pennellii is determined by major loci on chromosomes 1, 6 and 10. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82: 704–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chmielewski, T. (1962) Cytogenetical and taxonomical studies on a new tomato form. Part I. Genet. Polonica 3: 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chmielewski, T. (1966) An exception to the unidirectional crossability pattern in the genus Lycopersicon. Genet. Polonica 7: 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chmielewski, T. (1968) Cytogenetical and taxonomical studies on a new tomato form. Part II. Genet. Polonica 9: 97–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D.C. and Brink, R.A. (1945) Seed collapse following matings between diploid and tetraploid races of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium. Genetics 30: 376–399.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cope, F.W. (1962) The mechanism of pollen incompatibility in Theobroma cacao L. Heredity 17: 157–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePamphilis, C.W. and Wyatt, R. (1989) Hybridization and introgression in buckeyes (Aesculus: Hippocastanaceae): a review of the evidence and a hypothesis to explain long-distance gene flow. Syst. Bot. 14: 593–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne, L.A. (1961) Mechanisms of interspecific incompatibility in tuber-bearing Solanum species. Am. Pot. J. 38: 73–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin-Tong, V.E. and Franklin, F.C.H. (1992) Gametophytic self-incompatibility in Papaver rhoeas L. Sex. Plant. Reprod. 5: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, N.K. and Hanneman, R.E., Jr. (1989) Interspecific incompatibility due to stylar barriers in tuber-bearing and closely related non-tuber-bearing Solanums. Sex. Plant. Reprod. 2: 184–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadish, I. and Zamir, D. (1987) Differential zygotic abortion in an interspecific Lycopersicon cross. Genome 29: 156–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garde, N.M. (1959) Mechanisms of species isolation in tuberous Solanum. Agronomia Lusitana 21: 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gepts, P. and Bliss, F.A. (1985) F1 hybrid weakness in the common bean. J. Hered. 76: 447–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffreda, J.C., Steffens, J.C. and Mutschler, M.A. (1990) Association of epicuticular sugars with aphid resistance in hybrids with wild tomato. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 115: 161–165.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, W.H. (1986) Pepper breeding. In: M.J. Bassett (ed.), Breeding Vegetable Crops, pp. 69–134. AVI Publishing Co., Inc., Westport, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grun, P. (1970) Cytoplasmic sterilities that separate the cultivated potato from its putative diploid ancestors. Evolution 24: 750–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grun, P. and Radlow, A. (1961) Evolution of barriers to crossing of self-incompatible with self-compatible species of Solanum. Heredity 16: 137–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, H.H. and Openshaw, S.J. (1980) Interspecific and intergeneric hybridization. In: W.R. Fehr and H.H. Hadley (eds.), Hybridization of Crop Plants, pp. 133–159. American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haghighi, K.R. and Ascher, P.D. (1988) Fertile, intermediate hybrids between Phaseolus vulgaris and P. acutifolius from congruity backcrossing. Sex. Plant Reprod. 1: 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardon, J.J. (1967) Unilateral incompatibility between Solanum pennellii and Lycopersicon esculentum. Genetics 57: 795–808.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, B.J. and Darby, L.A. (1955) Unilateral hybridization. Nature 176: 982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermsen, J.G.T. (1979) Factors controlling interspecific crossability and their bearing on the strategy for breaking barriers to intercrossing of tuber-bearing Solanum species. In: A.C. Zeven and A.M. van Harten (eds.), Broadening the Genetic Base of Crops: Proceedings of the Conference, pp. 311–318. Pudoc, Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermsen, J.G.T. and Ramanna, M.S. (1976) Barriers to hybridization of Solanum bulbocastanum Dun. and S. verrucosum Schlechtd. and structural hybridity in their F1 plants. Euphytica 25: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermsen, J.G.T. and Sawicka, E. (1979) Incompatibility and incongruity in tuber-bearing Solanum species. In: J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester and A.D. Skelding (eds.) Biology and Taxonomy of the Solanaceae, pp. 445–453. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogenboom, N.G. (1972a) Breaking breeding barriers in Lycopersicon. 2. Breakdown of self-incompatibility in L. peruvianum ( L.) Mill. Euphytica 21: 228–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogenboom, N.G. (1972b) Breaking breeding barriers in Lycopersicon. 3. Inheritance of self-compatibility in L. peruvianum ( L.) Mill. Euphytica 21: 244–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogenboom, N.G. (1972c) Breaking breeding barriers in Lycopersicon. 4. Breakdown of unilateral incompatibility between L. peruvianum (L.) Mill. and L. esculentum Mill. Euphytica 21: 397–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogenboom, N.G. (1972d) Breaking breeding barriers in Lycopersicon. 5. The inheritance of the unilateral incompatibility between L. peruvianum (L.) Mill. and L. esulentum Mill. and the genetics of its breakdown. Euphytica 21: 405–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogenboom, N.G. (1973) A model for incongruity in intimate partner relationships. Euphytica 22: 229–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogenboom, N.G. (1975) Incompatibility and incongruity: Two different mechansims for the non functioning of intimate partner relationships. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 188: 361–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogenboom, N.G. (1979) Incompatibility and incongruity in Lycopersicon. In: J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester and A.D. Skelding (eds.), Biology and Taxonomy of the Solanaceae, pp. 435–444. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogenboom, N.G. (1986) Incongruity: non-functioning of intercellular and intracellular partner relationships through non-matching information. In: H.F. Linskens and J. Heslop-Harrison (eds.), Cellular Interactions, pp. 641–654. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, L. (1907) Ãœber die Selbststerilität einiger Blüten. Botanische Zeitung 66: 77–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, J., Kaul, V. and Williams, E.G. (1986) Self-incompatibility in Acacia retinodes: site of pollen tube arrest is the nucleus. Planta 169: 245–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kho, Y.O., den Nijs, A.P.M. and Franken, J. (1980) Interspecific hybridization in Cucumis L. II. The crossability of species. An investigation of in vivo pollen tube growth and seed set. Euphytica 29: 661–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinzer, S., Schwager, S. and Mutschler, M.A. (1990) Mapping of ripening-related or –specific cDNA clones of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Theor. Appl. Genet. 79: 489–496.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knox, R.B. (1986) Pollen-pistil interaction. In: H.F. Linskens and J. Heslop-Harrison (eds.), Cellular Interactions, pp. 508–608. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, R.B., Williams, E.G. and Dumas, C. (1986) Pollen, pistil, and reproductive function in crop plants. Plant Breeding Rev. 4: 9–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, R. (1950) Self-incompatibility in Lycopersicon peruvianum Mill. Hereditas 36: 509–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesley, M.M. (1950) A cytological basis for sterility in tomato hybrids. J. Hered. 41: 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. and Crowe, L.K. (1958) Unilateral interspecific incompatibility in flowering plants. Heredity 12: 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liedl, B.E. and Anderson, N.O. (1993) Reproductive barriers: Identification, uses and circumvention. Plant Breeding Rev. 11: 11–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedl, B.E., McCormick, S. and Mutschier, M.A. (1994) Unilateral incongruity is distinct from self-incompatibility in expression, timing and location in crosses involving Lycopersicon pennellii and L. esculentumn. Sex. Plant Reprod. (submitted).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S.C., Liedl, B.E. and Mutschler, M.A. (1994) Fertility and fecundity is altered in an interspecific F2 of a L. esculentum line containing L. pennellii cytoplasm x L. pennellii. Am. J. Bot. (submitted).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S.C. (1994) Nature and genetic control of hybrid breakdown and segregation distortion in interspecific F2 populations from Lycopersicon esculentum X L. pennelli. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, A. (1975) Complex self-incompatibility systems in angiosperms. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 188: 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, J.W. and Chiasson, L.P. (1947) Cytogenetic notes on tomato species and hybrids. Genetics 32: 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majid, R., Swaminathan, M.S. and Iyer, R.D. (1968) Production and cytogenetic analysis of interspecific hybrids in Lycopersicon. Ind. J. Genet. Plant Breeding 28: 275–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F.W. (1961a) Complex unilateral hybridization in Lycopersicon hirsutum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 47: 855–857.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F.W. (1961b) The inheritance of self-incompatibility in hybrids of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. x L. chilense Dun. Genetics 46: 1443–1454.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F.W. (1964) The inheritance of unilateral incompatibility in Lycopersicon hirsutum. Genetics 50: 459–469.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F.W. (1966) Avoiding unilateral barriers in tomato species crosses. Rpt. Tom. Genet. Coop. 16: 19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F.W. (1967) The genetic control of unilateral incompatibility between two tomato species. Genetics 56: 391–398.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F.W. (1968) The behavior of Lycopersicon incompatibility alleles in an alien genetic milieu. Genetics 60: 101–109.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, D.C. and Rick, C.M. (1954) Self-incompatibility in species of Lycopersicon sec. Eriopersicon and hybrids with L. esculentum. Hilgardia 23: 101–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosseler, A. (1989) Interspecific pollen-pistil incongruity in Salix. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 1161–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, G.B. and Mulcahy, D.L. (1983) A comparison of pollen tube growth in bi-and trinucleate pollen. In: D.L. Mulcahy and E. Ottaviano (eds.), Pollen: Biology and Implications for Plant Breeding, pp. 29–33. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., Amherst, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, G.B. and Mulcahy, D.L. (1988) The effect of supplemented media on the growth in vitro of bi-and trinucleate pollen. Plant Sci. 55: 213–216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mutschler, M.A., Cobb, E.D., Liu, S.C. and Liedl, B.E. (1994) Recurrent F1 bridging permits sexual transfer of Lycopersicon pennellii cytoplasm into tomato (L. esculentum) Sex. Plant Reprod. (submitted).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, C.A. and Topoleski, L.D. (1983) Effects of the basal medium on growth of immature tomato embryos in vitro. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108: 434–438.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nettancourt, D., de (1977) Incompatibility in Angiosperms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, K.K. (1968) Compatibility relationships in flowering plants: Role of the S-gene complex. Am. Nat. 102: 475–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pundir, R.P.S. and Singh, R.B. (1985) Crossability relationships among Cajanus, Atylosia and Rhynchosia species and detection of crossing barriers. Euphytica 34: 303–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pushkamath (1953) Studies on sterility in potatoes. IV. Genetics of incompatibility in Solanum aracc-papa. Euphytica 2: 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiros, C., Ochoa, O. and Douches, D. (1986) L. peruvianum x L. pennellii sexual hybrids. Rpt. Tom. Genet. Coop. 36: 31–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanna, M.S. and Hermsen, J.G.T. (1974) Unilateral `eclipse sterility’ in reciprocal crosses between Solanum verrucosum Schlechtd. and diploid S. tuberosum L. Euphytica 23: 417–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C.M. (1951) Hybrids between Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. and Solanum lycopersicoides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 37: 741–744.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C.M. (1956) Cytogenetics of the tomato. Adv. Genet. 8: 267–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C.M. (1960) Hybridization between Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum pennellii: Phylogenetic and cytogenetic significance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 46: 78–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C.M. (1963a) Barriers to interbreeding in Lycopersicon peruvianum. Evolution 17: 216–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C.M. (1963b) Differential zygotic lethality in a tomato species hybrid. Genetics 48: 1497–1507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C.M. (1969) Controlled introgression of chromosomes of Solanum pennellii into Lycopersicon esculentum: segregation and recombination. Genetics 62: 753–768.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C.M. (1972) Further studies on segregation and recombination in backcross derivatives of a tomato species hybrid. Biologisches Zentralblatt 91: 209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C.M. (1976) Natural variability in wild species of Lycopersicon and its bearing on tomato breeding. Genet. Agrar. 30: 249–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C.M. (1979) Biosystematic studies in Lycopersicon and closely related species of Solanum. In: J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester and A.D. Skelding (eds.), Biology and Taxonomy of the Solanaceae, pp. 667–677. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C.M. (1986) Reproductive isolation in the Lycopersicon peruvianum complex. In: W.G. D’Arcy (ed.), Solanaceae: Biology and Systematics, pp. 477–495. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C.M. and Lamm, R (1955) Biosystematic studies on the status of Lycoperiscon chilense. Am. J. Bot. 42: 663–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C.M. and Tanksley, S.D. (1981) Genetic variation in Solanum pennellii: Comparisons with two other sympatric species. Plant Syst. Evol. 131: 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C.M., Kesicki, E., Fobes, J.F. and Holle, M. (1976) Genetic and biosystematic studies on two new sibling species of Lycopersicon from Interandean Peru. Theor. Appl. Genet. 47: 55–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C.M., Fobes, J.F. and Tanksley, S.D. (1979) Evolution of mating systems in Lycopersicon hirsutum as deduced from genetic variation in electrophoretic and morphological characters. Plant Syst. Evol. 132: 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C.M., DeVerna, J.W., Chetelat, R.T. and Stevens, M.A. (1986) Meiosis in sesquidiploid hybrids of Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum lycopersicoides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83: 3580–3583.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Satina, S. and Blakeslee, A.F. (1941) Periclinal chimeras in Datura stramonium in relation to development of leaf and flower. Am. J. Bot. 28: 862–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, Y.-I., Ishikawa, R. and Morishima, H. (1990) Nonrandom association of genes and characters found in indica x japonica hybrids of rice. Heredity 65: 75–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawant, A.C. (1956) Semilethal complementary factors in a tomato species hybrid. Evolution 10: 93–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawant, A.C. (1958) Cytogenetics of interspecific hybrids, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. x L. hirsutum Humb. and Bonpl. Genetics 43: 502–514.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sitch, L.A. (1990) Incompatibility barriers operating in crosses of Oryza sativa with related species and genera. In: J.P. Gustafson (ed.), Gene Manipulation in Plant Improvement II, pp. 77–93. Plenum Press, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P.G. (1944) Embryo culture of a tomato species hybrid. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 44: 413–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, A.B. (1952) Reproduction in Petunia. Mem. Torrey Bot. Club 20: 1–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasburger, E. (1886) Ãœber Fremdartige Bestäubung. Jahrbücher für wissenschaftliche Botanik 17: 50–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, M.S. and Murty, B.R. (1957) One-way incompatibility in some species crosses in the genus Nicotiana. Ind. J. Genet. Plant Breeding 17: 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymkowiak, E.J. and Sussex, I.M. (1992) The interal meristem layer (L3) determines floral meristem size and carpel number in Lycopersicon periclinal chimeras. Plant Cell 4: 1089–1100.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tammes, T. (1928) The genetics of the genus Linum. Bibliogr. Genet. 4: 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I.B. (1986) Biosystematics of the tomato. In: J.G. Atherton and J. Rudich (eds.), The Tomato Crop: A Scientific Basis for Improvement, pp. 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman and Hall Ltd, London. Thompson, R.C., Whitaker, T.W. and Kosar, W.F. (1941) Interspecific genetic relationships in Latuca. J. Agric. Res. 63: 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilney-Bassett, R.A.E. (1986) Plant Chimeras. Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, D.H. (1955) Studies in British Primulas. IV. Hybridization between Primula vulgaris Huds. and P. veris L. New Phytol. 54: 70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tuyl, J.M., Marcucci, M.C. and Visser, T. (1982) Pollen and pollination experiments. VII. The effect of pollen treatment and application method on incompatibility and incongruity in Lilium. Euphytica 31: 613–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas Eyre, J. and Smith, G. (1916) Some notes on the Linaceae. J. Genet. 5: 189–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeden, N.F. and Robinson, R.W. (1986) Allozyme segregation ratios in the interspecific cross Cucurbita maxima and C. ecuadorensis suggest that hybrid breakdown is not caused by minor alterations in chromosome structure. Genetics 114: 593–609.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wendel, J.F. and Parks, C.R. (1984) Distorted segregation and linkage of alcohol dehydrogenase genes in Camellia japonica L. (Theaceae). Biochem. Genet. 22: 739–748.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodell, S.R.J. (1960) Studies in British Primulas. VII. Development of normal seed and of hybrid seed from reciprocal crosses between P. vulgaris Huds. and P. vents L. New Phytol. 59: 302–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamir, D. and Tadmor, Y. (1986) Unequal segregation of nuclear genes in plants. Bot. Gaz. 147: 355–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mutschler, M.A., Liedl, B.E. (1994). Interspecific crossing barriers in Lycopersicon and their relationship to self-incompatibility. In: Williams, E.G., Clarke, A.E., Knox, R.B. (eds) Genetic control of self-incompatibility and reproductive development in flowering plants. Advances in Cellular and Molecular Biology of Plants, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1669-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1669-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4340-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1669-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics