Skip to main content

Game Theory, Experience, Rationality

  • Chapter
Game Theory, Experience, Rationality

Part of the book series: Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [1997] ((VCIY,volume 5))

Abstract

In this paper I want to deal with game theory, experience and rationality, and I will try to put these into historical perspective.

Inaugural address delivered at the Symposium “Game Theory, Experience, Rationality”, Institute Vienna Circle 1996 (partly transcribed by Eckehart Köhler).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Literature

  • W. Albers, “Zwei Lösungskonzepte für kooperative Mehrpersonenspiele”, in: OR-Verfahren, XXI: 1975, pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Aumann, “Acceptable Points in General Cooperative n-Person Games”, Contribution to the Theory of Games,in: Annals of Mathematics Studies,40, 1959, pp. 287–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Aumann/M. Maschler, “The Bargaining Set for Cooperative Games”, in: Dresher, Shapley & Tucker (eds.): Advances in Game Theory, Annals of Mathematical Studies, 52, Princeton University Press 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.B. Ball/M.H. Bazerman/J.S. Caroll, “An Evaluation of Learning in the Bilateral Winner’s Curse”, in: Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Process, 48, 1991, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.K. Berninghaus/K.-M. Ehrhart, Stochastic Learning in Tacit Coordination Games, Discussion Paper, Game Theory and Experimental Economics, No. 2, Institut für Statistik und Mathematische Wirtschaftsforschung, Universität Karlsruhe, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Binmore, “Social Contract I: Harsanyi and Rawls”, in: Economic Journal, 99, pp. 84–102. K. Binmore, “Social Contract IV: Convention and Evolution”, in R. Selten (ed.): Rational Interaction: Essays in Honor of John Harsanyi, Springer, Berlin 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Binmore/A. Martin/A. Rubinstein, “Non-Cooperative Models of Bargaining”, in: Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, Amsterdam 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.H. Coase, “The Problem of Social Costs”, in: Journal of Law and Economics,3, 1960, pp. 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.A. Cournot, Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses,Paris 1838; transi. by N.T. Bacon (1899): Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth,Macmillan, New York; transi. by W.G. Waffenschmidt (1924): Untersuchungen über die mathematischen Grundlagen der Theorie des Reichtums,Fischer, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • F.Y. Edgeworth, Mathematical Psychics, Kegan Paul, London 1881.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Eshel/M. Feldman, “Initial Increase of New Mutants and Some Continuity Properties of ESS in Two Locus Systems”, in: American Naturalist, 124 (5), 1984, pp. 631–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.B. Gillies, “Some Theorems on n-Person Games”, Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Hammerstein/R. Selten, “Game Theory and Evolutionary Biology” in: R. Aumann/S Hart (eds.): Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications II, Amsterdam 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Harsanyi, “Approaches to the Bargaining Problem before and after the Theory of Games”, in: Econometrica, XXIV, 1956, pp. 144–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Harsanyi, “Bargaining and Conflict Situations in the Light of a New Approach to Game Theory”, in: The American Economic Review, LV, 1965, pp. 447–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Harsanyi, “Games with Incomplete Information Played by `Bayesian’ Players”, in: Management Science, 14, 1967–68, pp. 159–182, 320–334, 486–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Harsanyi, “An Equilibrium-Point Interpretation of Stable Sets and a Proposed Alternative Definition”, in: Management Science,20, 1974, pp. 1472–1495.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Harsanyi, “The Tracing Procedure”, in: International Journal of Game Theory,4, 1975, pp. 61–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Harsanyi, Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations, Cambridge University Press 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Harsanyi/R. Selten, “A Generalized Nash Solution for Two-Person Bargaining Games with Incomplete Information”, in: Management Science, 18, 1972, pp. 80–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Harsanyi/R. Selten, A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games, MIT Press, Cambridge MA 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Kahan/A. Rapoport, “A Test of the Bargaining Set and Kernel Models in Three-Person Games”, in Rapoport, A. (ed.): Game Theory as a Theory of Conflict Resolution, Reidel, Dordrecht 1974.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • E. Kalai/D. Samet, “Persistent Equilibria in Strategic Games”, in: International Journal of Game Theory, 13, 1984, pp. 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • G.K. Kalisch/J.W. Milnor/J.F. Nash/E.D. Nering, “Some Experimental n-Person Games”, in: Thrall, R.M., C.H. Coombs and R.L. Davis (eds.), Decision Processes, Wiley, New York 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Kohlberg/J.-F. Mertens, “On the Strategic Stability of Equilibria”, in: Econometrica 54, 1986, pp. 1003–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kreps/R. Wilson, “Sequential Equilibrium”, in: Econometrica, 50, 1982, pp. 863–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kreps/R. Wilson, “Sequential Equilibria”, in: Econometrica, 54, 1986, pp. 1003–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Kuon, Two Person Bargaining with Incomplete Information, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, No. 412, Berlin, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Luce/H. Raiffa, Games and Decisions, New York, Wiley 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Maynard Smith, Evolutionary Game Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Maynard Smith, Evolution and the Theory of Games, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Maynard Smith/G.R. Price, “The Logic of Animal Conflict”, in: Nature, 246, 1973, pp. 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Maschler, “Playing an n-Person Game. An Experiment”, in: Sauermann (ed.), Coalition Performing Behavior, Tübingen 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Mitzkewitz/R. Nagel, “Experimental Results on Ultimatum Games with Incomplete Information”, in: International Journal of Game Theory, 22, 1993, pp. 171–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Mitzkewitz/G.R. Uhlich, “Duopoly Strategies Programmed by Experienced Players”, in: Econometrica, 65, No 3, pp. 517–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.A.P. Moran, “On the Nonexistence of Adaptive Topographies”, in: American Human Geneticist, 27, 1964, pp. 343–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.B. Myerson, “Refinements of the Nash Equilibrium Concept”, in: International Journal of Game Theory, 7, 1978, pp. 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Nagel/F.F. Tang, Experimental Results on the Centipede Game in Normal Form: An Investigation of Learning, Discussion Paper No. 149, Center for Rationality and Interactive Decision Theory, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.F. Nash, “Equilibrium Points in n-Person Games”, in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 36, 1950, pp. 48–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.F. Nash, “The Bargaining Problem”, in: Econometrica,18, 1950, pp. 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.F. Nash, “Non-Cooperative Games”, in: Annals of Mathematics,54, 1951, pp. 286–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.F. Nash, “Two-Person Cooperative Games”, in: Econometrica,21, 1953, pp. 128–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Raiffa, The Art and Science of Negotiation, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Rubinstein, “Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model”, in: Econometrica,50, 1982, pp. 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Rubenstein/M.A. Osborne, Bargaining and Markets, San Diego 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Sbigum/F. Wensdop, Foundations of Utility and Risk Theory with Applications, Reidel, Dordrecht 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Selten, “Spieltheoretische Behandlung eines Oligopolmodells mit Nachfrageträgheit”, in: Zeitschrii t fair die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 121, 1975, pp. 01–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Selten, “Re-examination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games”, in: International Journal of Game Theory,4, 1975, pp. 25–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Selten, “A Note on Evolutionarily Stable Strategies in Asymmetrical Animal Conflicts”, in: Journal of Theoretical Biology, 84, 1980, pp. 3–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Selten, “Equal-Division Payoff Bounds”, in: R. Selten, Models of Strategic Rationality, Kluwer, Dordrecht 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Selten/J. Buchta, Experimental Sealed Bid First Price Auctions with Directly Observed Bid Functions,Universität Bonn: Sonderforschungsbereich 303, Discussion Paper: B 270.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Selten/U. Leopold, “Equilibrium Point Selection in a Bargaining Situation with Opportunity Costs”, in: Économie Appliquée, 1982, pp. 611–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Selten/M. Mitzkevitz/G.R. Uhlich, “Duopoly Strategies Programmed by Experienced Players”, in: Econometrica, 65, No. 3, 1997, pp. 517–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Selten/K.G. Schuster, “Psychological Variables and Coalition Forming Behavior”, in Borch, K. and D. Mossin (eds.), Risk and Uncertainty, London 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Selten/R. Stoecker, “End Behaviour in Sequences of Finite Prisoner’s Dilemma”, in: Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 7, 1986, pp. 47–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • L.S. Shapley, “A Value for n-Person Games”, in: Kuhn and Tucker, Contributions to the Theory of Games, II, Princeton University Press 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Schmeidler, “The Nucleolus of a Characteristic Function Game”, in: SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics,17, 1975, pp. 1163–1170

    Google Scholar 

  • G.R. Uhlich, Descriptive Theories of Bargaining. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer Verlag, Berlin 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Van Damme, “Extensive Form Games”, in: J.Eatwell/M. Milgate/P. Newman (eds.), Game Theory. The New Palgrave I: A Dictionary of Economics, Macmillan, London 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. von Neumann/O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior,Princeton University Press 1944/1953.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Selten, R. (1998). Game Theory, Experience, Rationality. In: Leinfellner, W., Köhler, E. (eds) Game Theory, Experience, Rationality. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [1997], vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1654-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1654-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4992-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1654-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics