Skip to main content

Introducing Grade to Some Metalogical Notions

  • Chapter
Fuzzy Sets, Logics and Reasoning about Knowledge

Part of the book series: Applied Logic Series ((APLS,volume 15))

Abstract

That classical two-valued logic is ill-equipped to deal with reasoning involving vague concepts is quite evident now. One instance of the inadequacy lies in that the so-called Sorites and other paradoxes [Cargile, 1969; Dummett, 1978] emerge when classical rules of inference are applied to premises involving vague expressions. But vagueness is all-pervasive in natural language expressions and strangely, through such an inexact medium we communicate, reason and take decisions in everyday life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. W. Sandler and L. J. Kohout. Semantics of Implication Operators and Fuzzy Relational Products. In Fuzzy Reasoning and its Application, E. H. Mamdani and B. R. Gaines, eds. pp. 219 – 246. Academic Press, London, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Black. Vagueness - an exercise in logical analysis, 1937. Reprinted in M. Black, Language and Philosophy, pp. 25–58. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Cargile. The Sorites Paradox. Brit. J. Philos. Sci., 20, 190 – 202, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. L. Castro, E. Trillas and S. Cubillo. On Consequence In Approximate Reasoning, preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. K. Chakraborty. Use of Fuzzy Set Theory In Introducing Graded consequence In Multiple Valued Logic. In Fuzzy Logic in Knowledge-Based Systems, Decision and Control, M. M. Gupta and T. Yamakawa, eds. pp. 247 – 257. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. ( North-Holland ), 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. K. Chakraborty. Graded Consequence: Further Studies, Journal of Applied Non-classical Logics, 5, 127 – 137, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. K. Chakraborty and S. Basu. Graded Consequence and Some Metalogical Notions Generalized. In Fundamenta Informaticae 32, pp. 299 – 311. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. P. Cleave. The Notion of Logical Consequence In The Logic of Inexact Predicates, Zeitscher. f Math. Lorgik und Grundlagen d. Math., 20, 307 – 324, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Dubois, J. Lang and H. Prade. Possibilistic Logic. In Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Vol. 3,D. M. Gabbay and C. J. Hogger, eds. pp. 439-510. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Dummett. Wang’s Paradox. Reprinted in Truth and Other Enigmas„ pp. 248–268. Duckworth, London, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. A. Edmonds. Lattice Fuzzy Logics, Int. J. Man-machine Studies, 13, 455 – 465, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Frege. Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Frege, P. Geach and M. Black, eds. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. R. Gaines. Foundations of Fuzzy Reasoning. In Fuzzy Automata and Decision Processes, M. M. Gupta, G. N. Saridis and B. R. Gaines, eds. pp. 19 – 75. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Gentzen. Investigations Into Logical Deduction. In The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen, M. E. Szabo, ed. pp. 68 – 131. North-Holland Publications, Amsterdam, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Gerla. An Extension Principle for Fuzzy Logic. Mathematical Logic Quarterly, 40, 357 – 380, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Gerla. Graded Consequence Relations and Fuzzy Closure Operators. Journal of Applied Non-classical Logics, 6, 369 – 379, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. G. Gerla and R. Tortora. Fuzzy Natural Deduction, Zeitschr. f. Math. Logik und Grundlagen d. Math., 36, 67 – 77, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J. A. Goguen. The Logic of Inexact Concepts, Synthese,19, 325–373, 1968/69.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Gottwald. Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic, Vieweg, Wiesbaden, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Hdjek, L. Godo and F. Esteva. A Complete many-valued logic, with Product Conjunction, Arch. Math Logic,35, 191–208, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Hdjek. Fuzzy Logic from The Logical Point of View, preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  22. V. Novak. Fuzzy Sets and I-norms in the light of fuzzy logic. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 29, 113 – 127, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. V. Novak. On Syntactico - Semantical Completeness of First Order Fuzzy Logic, Parts I and II, Kybernetica, 26, 47 – 154, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Pavelka. On Fuzzy Logic, I, II, III, Zeitschr. f Math. Logik und Grundlagen d. Math., 25, 45–52; 119–134; 447 – 464, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Rasiowa. Toward Fuzzy Logic. In Fuzzy Logic for the Management of Uncertainty, L. A. Zadeh, and J. Kacprzyk, eds. pp. 5 – 25, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  26. H. Rasiowa. On Approximation Logics: A Survey, Jahrbuch 1990 der Kurt-GödelGesellschaft, pp. 63 - 87, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  27. H. Rasiowa and Ng. Cat Ho. LT- Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 47, 323 – 339, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. H. Rasiowa and R. Sikorski. The Mathematics of Metamathematics, Panstwowe Wydawnietwo Naukowe, Warszawa, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  29. B. Russell. Vagueness, Australian Jn of Philosophy, 1, 85 – 92, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  30. B. Russell and A. N. Whitehead. Principia Mathematica, Cambridge University Press, 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  31. D. J. Shoesmith and T. J. Smiley. Multiple Conclusion Logic, Carnbridge University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Z. Sikic. A Proof of the Characterization Theorem for Consequence Relations, Zeit. f Math. Logik und Grundlagen d. Math., 37, 41 – 43, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. A. Tarski. Methodology of Deductive Sciences. In Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, pp. 60–109, Clarendon Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  34. E. Turunen. Algebraic Structures in Fuzzy Logic, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 52, 181 – 188, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. E. Turunen. On Fuzzy intuitionistic Logic. In Fuzzy Logic for the Management of Uncertainty, L. A. Zadeh and J. Kacprazyk, eds. pp. 159 – 169. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  36. L. A. Zadeh. Fuzzy Sets, Information and Control, 8, 338 – 353, 1965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. L. A. Zadeh. Fuzzy Logic and Approximate Reasoning (In memory of Moisil), Synthese, 30, 407 – 428, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chakraborty, M.K., Basu, S. (1999). Introducing Grade to Some Metalogical Notions. In: Dubois, D., Prade, H., Klement, E.P. (eds) Fuzzy Sets, Logics and Reasoning about Knowledge. Applied Logic Series, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1652-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1652-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5324-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1652-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics