Skip to main content

Expected Utility Theory does Not Apply to All Rational Men

  • Chapter
Foundations of Utility and Risk Theory with Applications

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLU,volume 37))

Abstract

Expected utility theory is claimed to apply to all rational persons. It is the purpose of this paper to disprove this claim, by exhibiting a class of rational persons whose preference ordering between uncertain prospects conflicts with expected utility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allais, M.: 1953, ‘L’Extension des Theories de l’Equilibre Economique Général et du Rendement Social au Cas du Risque’, Econometrica 21, pp. 269–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allais, M. and 0. Hagen (eds.): 1979, Expected Utility

    Google Scholar 

  • Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox: Contemporary Discussions of Decisions under Uncertainty with Allais’ Rejoinder Reidel, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, J.M.: 1979, ‘The Utility of Being Hanged on the Gallows’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economy 2(2), pp. 231–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, J.M.: 1979, ‘Investment Evaluation under Uncertainty’, Financial Management 8, pp. 61–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, J.M.: 1980, ‘The Utility of Being Hanged on the Gallows - Reply’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economy 3(1), pp. 132–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, J.M.: 1982, ‘The Utility of Being Hanged on the

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallows - Some Replies’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economy 4(2), pp. 322–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, J.M.: 1983, Dynamic Economic Systems M.E. Sharpe, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsch, K.: 1968, The Economics of Uncertainty Princeton University Press, Princeton, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J., and J.G. Riley: 1979, ‘The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information - An Expository Survey’, Journal of Economic Literature 17(4), pp. 1375–1421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Lee, M.W.: 1976, The Value of Life Martin Robertson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnerooth, J.: 1979, ‘The Value of Human Life: A Review of the Models’, Economic Inquiry 17(1), pp. 52–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.: 1937, Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776) The Modern Library, New York, p. 325.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blatt, J.M. (1983). Expected Utility Theory does Not Apply to All Rational Men. In: Stigum, B.P., Wenstøp, F. (eds) Foundations of Utility and Risk Theory with Applications. Theory and Decision Library, vol 37. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1590-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1590-4_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8364-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1590-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics