Skip to main content

Knowledge Construction and Diverging Thinking in Elementary & Advanced Mathematics

  • Chapter
Book cover Forms of Mathematical Knowledge

Abstract

This paper begins by considering the cognitive mechanisms available to individuals which enable them to operate successfully in different parts of the mathematics curriculum. We base our theoretical development on fundamental cognitive activities, namely, perception of the world, action upon it and reflection on both perception and action. We see an emphasis on one or more of these activities leading not only to different kinds of mathematics, but also to a spectrum of success and failure depending on the nature of the focus in the individual activity. For instance, geometry builds from the fundamental perception of figures and their shape, supported by action and reflection to move from practical measurement to theoretical deduction and euclidean proof. Arithmetic, on the other hand, initially focuses on the action of counting and later changes focus to the use of symbols for both the process of counting and the concept of number. The evidence that we draw together from a number of studies on children’s arithmetic shows a divergence in performance. The less successful seem to focus more on perceptions of their physical activities than on the flexible use of symbol as process and concept appropriate for a conceptual development in arithmetic and algebra. Advanced mathematical thinking introduces a new feature in which concept definitions are formulated and formal concepts are constructed by deduction. We show how students cope with the transition to advanced mathematical thinking in different ways leading once more to a diverging spectrum of success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baroody, A.J. and Ginsburg, H.P.: 1986, ‘The relationship between initial meaningful and mechanical knowledge of arithmetic’, in J. Hiebert (ed.), Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case for Mathematics, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 75–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beth, E.W. and Piaget, J.: 1966, Mathematical Epistemology and Psychology, (translated by W. Mays), D. Reidel. Dordrecht, The Netherlands (originally published 1965 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, W.A.: 1935, ‘Psychological considerations in the learning and teaching of arithmetic’, in W.D. Reeve (ed.), Teaching of Arithmetic, The Tenth Yearbook of the National Council of Teacher’s of Mathematics, Bureau of Publication, Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Yackel, E. and Wood, T.: 1992, ‘A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 23, 2–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collis., K. and Romberg, T.: 1991, ‘Assessment of mathematical performance: An analysis of open-ended test items’, in C. Wittrock and E. Baker (eds.), Testing and Cognition, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, pp. 82–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Nichols, D., Schwingendorf, K., Thomas, K. and Vidakovic, D.: 1996, ‘Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a co-ordinated process schema’, Journal of Mathematical Behaviour 15, 167–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F.: 1994, The Astonishing Hypothesis, Simon 0026 Schuster, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R.B.: 1984, Learning mathematics: the cognitive science approach to mathematics education, Ablex. Publishing Co., Norwood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienes, Z.P.: 1960, Building up Mathematics, Hutchinson Educational, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, E.: 1991, ‘Reflective abstraction’, in D.O. Tall (ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 95–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, E., Elterman, F. and Gong, C.: 1988, ‘The students construction of quantification’, For the Learning of Mathematics 8, 44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffin, J.M. and Simpson. A.P.: 1993, ‘Natural, conflicting, and alien’, Journal of Mathematical Behaviour 12, 313–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E.M.: 1993, ‘Count-on: The parting of the ways in simple arithmetic’, in I. Hirabayashi, N. Hohda, K. Shigematsu and Fou-Lai Lin (eds.), Proceedings of XVII International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Tsukuba, Japan, Vol. I, pp. 204–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E.M. and Tall, D.O.: 1994, ‘Duality, ambiguity and flexibility: A proceptual view of simple arithmetic’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 25 (2), 115–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E.M. and Pitta, D.: 1997, ‘Changing Emily’s Images’, Mathematics Teaching 161, 38–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J.: 1983, ‘Conceptual entities’, in D. Genter and A.L. Stevens (eds.), Mental Models, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 227–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harel, G. and Kaput, J.: 1992, ‘Conceptual entitities in advanced mathematical thinking: The role of notations in their formation and use’, in D.O. Tall (ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 82–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutetskii, V.A.: 1976, The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren, (translated by J. Teller), University of Chicago, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1950, The Psychology of Intelligence, (translated by M. Piercy ), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1972, The Principles of Genetic Epistemology, (translated by W. Mays), Routledge 0026 Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1985, The Equilibrium of Cognitive Structures, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massechusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B.: 1971, Mental Imagery in the Child, Basic, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, M.M.F.: 1996, Students’ Use of Quantifiers,Paper presented to the Advanced Mathematical Thinking Working Group at The Twentieth Conference of the International

    Google Scholar 

  • Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Valencia, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, M.M.F.: 1998, ‘Students’ Understanding of real analysis’, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Mathematics Education Research Centre, University of Warwick, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, M.M.F. and Gray, E.: 1995, ‘Difficulties teaching mathematical analysis to nonspecialists’, in D. Carraher and L. Miera (eds.), Proceedings of XIX International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Recife, Brazil, 2, 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, M.M.F. and Tall, D.O.: 1996, ‘Student teachers’ conceptions of the rational numbers’, in L. Puig and A. Guitiérrez (eds.), Proceedings of XX International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Valencia, 4, pp. 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitta, D. and Gray, E.: 1997a, In the Mind. What can imagery tell us about success and failure in arithmetic?’, In G.A. Makrides (ed.), Proceedings of the First Mediterranean Conference on Mathematics, Nicosia, Cyprus, pp. 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitta, D. and Gray, E.: 1997b, ‘Emily and the supercalculator’, in E. Pehkonen (ed.), Proceedings of XXI International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Lahti, Finland, 4, pp. 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitta, D.: 1998, ‘In the mind. Internal representations and elementary arithmetic’, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Mathematics Education Research Centre, University of Warwick, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A.H.: 1992, ‘Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics’, in D.A. Grouws (ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, MacMillan, New York, pp. 334–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A.: 1989, ‘Transition from operational to structural conception: The notion of function revisited’, in G. Vergnaud, J. Rogalski, M. Arigue (eds.), Proceedings of XIII International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Paris, France, Vol. 3, pp. 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A.: 1991, ‘On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 22, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. and Linchevski, L.: 1994, ‘The gains and pitfalls of reification—the case of algebra’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 26, 191–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R.R.: 1976, ‘Relational understanding and instrumental understanding’, Mathematics Teaching 77, 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R.R.: 1979, Intelligence, Learning and Action,Chichester, U.K., John Wiley 0026 Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steife, L., Von Glaserfeld, E., Richards, J. and Cobb, P.: 1983, Children’s Counting Types: Philosophy, Theory and Applications, Preagar, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D.O.: 1991, Advanced Mathematical Thinking, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D.O.: 1993a ‘Mathematicians thinking about students thinking about mathematics’, Newsletter of the London Mathematical Society 202, 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D.O.: 1993b, ‘Real mathematics, rational computers and complex people’, Proceedings of the Fifth Annual International Conference on Technology in College Mathematics Teaching, pp. 243–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D. 0.: 1995, ‘Cognitive growth in elementary and advanced mathematical thinking’, in D. Carraher and L. Miera (eds.), Proceedings of XIX International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Recife, Brazil. Vol. 1, pp. 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D.O. and Vinner, S.: 1981, ‘Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 12, 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomdike, E.L.: 1922, The Psychology of Arithmetic, MacMillan, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hiele, P. and D.: 1959, The child’s thought and geometry, Reprinted (1984), in D. Fuys, D. Geddes and R. Tischler (eds.), English translation of selected writings of Dina van Hiele-Geldof and Pierre M. van Hiele, Brooklyn College, Brooklyn, NY, pp. 1–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hiele, P.: 1986, Structure and Insight, Academic Press, Orlando.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, S.S., Resnick, L.B. and Groen, G.J.: 1975, ‘An experimental test of five process models for subtraction’, Journal of Educational Psychology 67, 17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gray, E., Pinto, M., Pitta, D., Tall, D. (1999). Knowledge Construction and Diverging Thinking in Elementary & Advanced Mathematics. In: Tirosh, D. (eds) Forms of Mathematical Knowledge. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1584-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1584-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5330-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1584-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics