Skip to main content

Bekker’s Opponents: Confessionalism under Siege and Cartesianism in Crisis

  • Chapter
Book cover Fallen Angels

Abstract

The earliest and most heated opposition to The World Bewitched came from the conservative, confessional wing of the Reformed church. Heirs of Gomarus and Voetius, these dogmatic Calvinists saw the Bekker controversy as an important battle in their campaign to protect the Reformed faith from the corrosive influences of Cartesian philosophy and the exegetical methods associated with it. The confessionalists targeted Bekker’s biblical exegesis for their harshest criticism, arguing that his figurative interpretation of scriptural passages dealing with spirits cast into doubt the veracity and authority of the entire Bible. They also attacked Bekker’s Cartesian ideas and charged that it was his allegiance to the new philosophy that led him into his exegetical errors. In their assault on Bekker’s ideas conservatives armed themselves with the biblical literalism that formed the intellectual foundation of Dutch Reformed confessionalism. Again and again they mustered biblical passages that they believed showed the devil’s power and the actions of spirits on bodies. Any attempt to interpret passages in a context larger than that provided by the words themselves was anathema to the confessionalists, and violent verbal assaults on Bekker often accompanied these arguments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. D. Nauta, et. al. (eds.), Biografisch Lexicon voor de Geschiedenis van het Nederlandse Protestantisme (Kampen, 1983), 11, 256–257.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Everardus van der Hooght, Vierde Briev van Haggebher Philaleethees Geschreven aun zijnen Vriend N.N. Over het Weesen, Denken, Willen, Vermogen, ende de Plaats der Engelen, in het gemeen, ende der quade Geesten, in het byzonder. Item, van des menschen Ziele, en hare Werking, hetzij Afgesondert, ofte ook vereenighte met her Lichaam, ende hoe verre de quade geesten op de selve konnen werken (Amsterdam, 1691), 59–60.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.P. de Bie, J. Loosjes, er. al., Biografisch Woordenhoek van Protestantsche Godgeleerden in Nederland (The Hague, 1903–1949), I, 615–618.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Henricus Brinck, De Godslasteringen van de Amsterdamsche Predikant Dr. Balthasar Bekker Ter Waarschouwing van alle Vroome in der Lande, Wederleyd In de Vorreden voor de Toet-Steen der Waarheid en der Meyningen (Utrecht, 1691), pp. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Richard A. Watson, The Downfall of Cartesianism 1673–1712: A Study of Epistemological Issues in Late Seventeenth-Century Cartesianism (The Hague, 1966), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid., 49–64; Michael E. Hobart, Science and Religion in the Thought of Nicolas Malebranche (Chapel Hill, 1982 ), 122–125.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Arnold Geulincx, Van de hoofddeugden: De eerste tuchtverhandeling,ed. C. Verhoeven (Baam, 1986), 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Nauta, et. al.,eds., (Kampen, 1988), 151–154.

    Google Scholar 

  9. YHenricus Groenewegen, Pneumatica. offe leer van de Geesten, Zijnde Denkende en Redelijke Wesens, in Welk Bewesen word, dat de zelve Geesten, en wel hijsonder Engelen, zoo Goede als Quade, Oefenen dadelike werkingen, volgens huren natuur, op Lichamen (Enkhuizen, 1692), vol. III, 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johannes Aalstius and Paulus Steenwinkel, Zedige Aanmerkingen waar in de Gronden en de daar op gebouwde redeneringen van de Wijtberoemden Heer Dr. Balth. Bekker, Nopende den Aard en Werkingen der Geesten aan Gods Woort en de Reden getoetst worden (Dordrecht, 1693), 151–159.

    Google Scholar 

  11. In a reply to Aalstius and Steenwinkel published in 1693, Bekker said that he had added a chapter between chapters VI and VII of book two in order to directly address the actions of spirits. See Balthasar Bekker, Brief van Balthasar Bekker S.T.D. en Predikant tot Amsterdam Aan twee eerwardige Predikanten, D. Joannes Aalstius tot Hoornaar Ende D. Paulus Steenwinkel tot Schelluinen Over derselver Zedige Aanmerkingen Op een deel des tweeden Boex van sijn Werk genaamd De Betoverde Weereld (Amsterdam, 1693 ), 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Balthasar Bekker, De Betoverde Weereld, Zynde een Grondig Onderzoek van ‘t gemeen gevoelen aangaande de Geesten, deselver Art en Vermogen, Bewind en Bedrijf als ook ‘t gene de Menschen door deselver kraght en gemeenschap doen (Amsterdam, Daniel van Dalen, 1691), II, 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  13. bid., 38. Margaret Jacob, The Newtonians in the English Revolution (Ithaca, NY, 1976), 61–107.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bekker, De Betoverde Weereld, II, 60–61, 64–65.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bekker, Brief,7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Andrew Fix, “Hoe Cartesiaans was Balthasar Bekker?” It Beaken: Tydskrift fan de Fryske Akademy 58: 2–3 (1996), 118–135.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Willem Deurhoff and Willem van Blyenberg, Klaare en Beknopte Verhandeling van de Natuur en Werking der Menschelijke Zielen, Engelen en Duivelen (Amsterdam, 1692), 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Willem Deurhoff and Henricus Brinck, Vervolg van de Kloure en Beknopte Verhandeling van de Natuuren Werking der Menschelijke Zielen, Engelen en Duivelen (Amsterdam, 1693), 43–44.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid., 7–8. Surprisingly, however, Brinck implied that Deurhoff himself did not hold these occasionalistic ideas. He claimed instead that Deurhoff recognized the absurdity of this position and therefore denied that angels and devils acted on things outside themselves. Brinck thus vented his anger toward Cartesianism by casting Deurhoff on the same side of the spirit controversy as Bekker.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fix, A. (1999). Bekker’s Opponents: Confessionalism under Siege and Cartesianism in Crisis. In: Fallen Angels. International Archives of the History of Ideas / Archives Internationales D’Histoire des Idées, vol 165. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1531-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1531-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5285-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1531-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics