Skip to main content

Aspects of Uncertainty and Complexity in Technologies and Technosystems

  • Chapter
Evolution and Progress in Democracies

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLA,volume 31))

  • 252 Accesses

Abstract

Dealing with the ramifications of technological change is one of the most challenging problems confronting democratic societies. The fundamental nature of the challenge can be described very succinctly: On the one hand, there is the irrefutable generalization that technical and organizational innovations are the main driving forces of economic growth and improved standards of living; and on the other hand, there is the equally irrefutable fact that this historical generalization provides little, if any, guidance for prediction or social action concerning particular technologies. In economic terms, there exists no epistemological link between macroeconomic “laws” of growth (derived from empirical hindsight) and the micro- and mesoeconomic phenomena associated with the technological-change process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aharoni, Y. (1981), The No-Risk Society, Chatham, NJ, Chatham House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.H. (1978), Chase, Chance and Creativity: The Lucky Art of Novelty, New York, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, R.U. (1988), “Self-organization in biology and economics,” Research Report 88–1, Laxenburg, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. (1981), Evolutionary Economics, Beverly Hills, CA, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodley, C.E., T. Lane and T.M. Stough (1999), “Knowledge discovery and data mining,” American Scientist, 87 /1, 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J., R. Tollison and G. Tullock (eds.), Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society,College Station, TX, Texas AandM University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1985), Treatise on Basic Philsophy, Vol. 7, Part I1: Philosophy of Science and Technology, Dordrecht/Boston, MA, D. Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1996), Finding Philosophy in Social Science, New Haven, CT,: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1998), Social Science under Debate: A Philosophical Perspective, Toronto, University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Greene, K.B. (1973), Sociotechnical Systems: Factors in Analysis, Design, and Management, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jouvenel, B. (1967), The Art of Conjecture, New York, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, E.J. (1985), Concorde and Dissent, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Foster, R.N. (1986), Innovation: The Attacker’s Advantage, New York, Summit Press. French-Constant, R.H. (1995), “The zap trap”, The Sciences, 35 /2, 31–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Götschl, J. (1990), “Zur philosophischen Bedeutung des Paradigmas der Selbstorganisation für den Zusammenhang von Naturverständnis und Selbstverständnis”, in: Krohn, W. and Köppers (eds.), Selbstorganisation: Aspekte einer wissenschaftlichen Revolution, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden, Vieweg

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, T.J. (1969), “The feedback between technology and values,” in: Baier, K. and N. Rescher (eds.), Values and the Future, New York, Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grad, F.B., G.W. Rathjens and A.J. Rosenthal, Environmental Control: Priorities, Politics, and the Law,New York, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T.P. (1998), Rescuing Prometheus, New York, Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P.M. (1988), “The role of government in changing industrial societies: a Schumpeter perspective,” in: H. Hanusch (ed.), Evolutionary Economics, Ch. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, J., D. Sawers and A. Stillerman (1969), The Sources of Invention, 2nd edn., New York, Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantrowitz, A. (1975), “Controlling technology democratically,” American Scientist, 63/5, 505–9. Kidder, T. (1981), The Soul of a New Machine, Boston, MA, Atlantic Monthly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A. (1987), Innovation Patterns in Crisis and Prosperity: Schumpeter’s Long Cycle

    Google Scholar 

  • Reconsidered,London, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1921), Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Boston, MA, Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamberton, D.M. (1996), “Infrastructure: a nebulous and overworked construct?” International Journal of Technology Management, 12/5–6, 696–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlup, F. (1982), “Semantic quirks in the study of information,” in: Machlup, F. and U. Mansfield (eds.), The Study of Information: Interdisciplinary Messages, New York: Wiley, 641–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and Z. Shapira, “Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking,” Management Science,33/11, 1404–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1890), Principles of Economics, London, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, J. and S.J. Mantel, Jr., (1994) Project Management, 3rd edn. New York, Wiley. Morrison, E. (1966), Men, Machines, and Modern Times, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.N. (1987), Understanding Technical Change as an Evolutionary Process, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.N. and S.G. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C. (1991), “Institutions,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 /1, 971–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, W.S. (1975), “The effects of technological change: exploring successive ripples”, in: Gold, B. (ed.), Technological Change: Economics, Management and Environment, Oxford, Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1956), “The diffusion problem in mass behavior,” General Systems Yearbook, 15260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosegger, G. (1990), “Aspects of the life cycle in industry and trade”, in: Vasko, T., R.U. Ayres and L. Fontvieille (eds.), Life Cycles and Long Waves, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Berlin/New York, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosegger, G. (1991), “The benefits and costs of international cooperation in mature industries: an American perspective,” International Journal of Technology Management, Special Issue on the Role of Technology in Corporate Policy, 256–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosegger, G. (1991a), “Advances in information technology and the innovation strategies of firms”, Prometheus, 9 /1, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosegger, G. (1995), “Technical change without humans: innovation in the neoclassical economic theory”, in: J. Götschl (ed.), Revolutionary Changes in Understanding Man and Society, Dordrecht/Boston/London, Kluwer, 39–51.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosegger, G. (1996), The Economics of Production and Innovation: An Industrial Perspective, 3rd edn., Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosegger, G. and R.N. Baird (1987), “Entry and exit of makes in the automobile industry, 18951960: an international comparison”, OMEGA, International Journal of Management Science, 15 /2, 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosegger, G. and S.J. Mantel, Jr. (1995), “The supervision and evaluation of innovation projects”, Technology Management, 2 /1995, 68–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, translation of Die Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung (1912), Boston, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C.E. and W. Weaver (1949), The Mathematical Theory of Communication, Urbana, IL, University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, S. (1999), “Patent absurdities”, The Sciences, 39 /1, 30–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tassey, G. (1992), Technology Infrastructure and Competitive Position, Norwell, MA, Kluwer. Tenner, E. (1996), Why Things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences, New York, Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, J. (1982), “Take the A-plane”, Science 82, Jan.-Feb., 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, J.M. (1994), Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Duijn, J.J. (1983), The Long Wave in Economic Life, London, Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rosegger, G. (2001). Aspects of Uncertainty and Complexity in Technologies and Technosystems. In: Götschl, J. (eds) Evolution and Progress in Democracies. Theory and Decision Library, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1504-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1504-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5842-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1504-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics