Skip to main content

Market Uncertainty and the Process of Belief Formation

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLA,volume 31))

Abstract

Economists have frequently participated in philosophical, statistical, and psychological debates on the foundations of probability. Recent examples (e.g., Allais, 1983) could be added to the names more traditionally cited in this respect. But as economists, i.e., as scientists making use of arguments grounded upon the specific tools of economic theory, they have said relatively little on the subject. French physiocrats, for example, maintained that probability should play a central role in the human and social sciences, but they failed to make use of the economic concepts underlying their analyses to explain in which way it should do so. Thus, they did not provide any economic foundation of probability. The same observation holds regarding Francis Y. Edgeworth when, a century later, he simply noted that banking was basically a business in probability.

This research has been supported by a research contract of the Commissariat Général du Plan (n°16/1990). Helpful comments by J-P. Auray, D. Bouysou, M. Cohen, J-Y Jaffray, V. Dumitru, and J-L. Rullière on an earlier version of this article, as well as help for the figures from C. Sarazin, are gratefully acknowledged. All remaining errors are the author’s responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allais, Maurice (1983), “Fréquence, Probabilité et Hasard,” Journal de la Société de Statistique de Paris, 124(2), 70–102 and 124(39; 144–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allais, Maurice (1988), “The General Theory of Random Choices in Relation to the Invariant Cardinal Utility Function and the Specific Probability Function, the (U,0) model: A General Overview”, in: Bertrand R. Munier (ed.), Risk, Decision and Rationality. Dordrecht, Reidel, Kluwer, 231–289.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe, F.J. and Robert J. Aumann (1963), “A Definition of Subjective Probability,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 34 (1), 199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgine, Paul (ed.) (1989), “Economic Reasoning and Artificial Intelligence”, Theory and Decision, 27(1–2) (special issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf (1950), The Logical Foundations of Probability, Chicago, Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Sung-Ku (1986), Le Phénomène de Surconfiance dans l’Estimation des Probabilités Subjectives et les Caractéristiques de l’Information, unpublished dissertation, Université d’Aix-Marseille I II, Institut d’Administration des Entreprises, Aix-en-Provence, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Finetti, Bruno (1937), “La Prévision: Ses Lois Logiques, ses Sources Subjectives,” Annales de L’Institut Poincaré 7, 1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, Didier (1988), “Possibility Theory: Searching for Normative Foundations”, in: Bertrand R. Munier (ed.), Risk, Decision and Rationality, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 601–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, Didier and Henri Prade (1990), “Quantifying Vagueness and Possibility: New Trends in Knowledge Representation”, in: George M. von Furstenberg (ed), Acting under Uncertainty. Multidisciplinary Conceptions, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 399–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, H.J. and R.M. Hogarth (1985), “Ambiguity and Uncertainty in Probabilistic Inference”, Psychological Review 92, 433–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haavelmo, T. (1958), “The Role of the Econometrician in the Advancement of Economic Theory”, Econometrica 26 (4), 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffray, Jean-Yves (1989), “Coherent Bets Under Partially Resolving Uncertainty and Belief Functions”, Theory and Decision 26, 99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, Roger E., Ortwinn Renn, Paul Slovic, Halina S. Brown, Jacques Embel, Robert Goble, Jeanne X. Kasperson, and Samuel Ratick (1988), “The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework”, Risk Analysis 8 (2), 177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, John M. (1921), A Treatise on Probability, London, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, John M. (1937), “The General Theory of Employment” Quarterly Journal of Economics 51(2), 209–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, David H., R. Duncan Luce, Patrick Suppes, and Amos Tversky (1971) Foundations of Measurement. Additive Polynomial Representations, New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munier, Bertrand R. (1986), “Complexité et Décision Stratégique dans l’Incertain: Que Peut-On Retenir de la Théorie?”, in: Boiteux M., Th. de Montbrial and B.R. Munier (eds.), Marchés Capital et Incertitude. Essais en l’Honneur de Maurice Allais. Paris, Economica (English Version Kluwer 1991 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Munier, Bertrand R. (ed.) (1988), Risk, Decision and Rationality, Dordrecht, Reidel, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munier, Bertrand R. (1991), “Expected Utility versus Anticipated Utility: Where do we stand?” Opening lecture to the 21st Annual Conference of the Institut de Mathématiques Economiques at Dijon, France, Nov. 24, 1989, NR GRID 89–11, to appear in Fuzzy Sets and Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munier, Bertrand R. and Mohammed Abdellaoui (1991), “Expected Utility Violations: An Appropriate and Intercultural Experiment”, in: Chikan, Attila (ed.), New Developments in Utility and Risk Theory. Dordrecht, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nau, Robert F. (1989), “Decision Analysis with Indeterminate or Incoherent Probabilities” Annals of Operations Research 19, 375–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orleans, André (1989), “Mimetic Contagion and Speculative Bubbles”, Theory and Decision 27 (1–2). 63–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, John (1982), “A Theory of Anticipated Utility” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3, 323–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, Frank P. (1931), “Probability and Partial Belief’, in: Braithwaite, R.B. (ed.), The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Esscrvs by Frank P. Ramsey. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 256–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, Leonard J. (1954), Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley. Second edition, Dover Publications, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, Leonard J. (1971), “Elicitation of Personal Probabilities and Expectations” Journal of the American Statistical Association 66 (336) 783–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrijver (1986), Theory of Linear and Integer Programming. New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. (1983), “The Role of Expectations in an Adaptative or Behavioristic Model”, in: Herbert A. Simon, Models of Bounded Rationality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 380–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venn, John (1866), The Logic of Chance, London, Macmillan. Reprinted: New York, Chelsea, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Mises, Richard (1928), Probability, Statistics and Truth. London, George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakker, Peter (1990), “Under Stochastic Dominance, Choquet-Expected Utility and Anticipated Utility Are Identical”, Theory and Decision 29 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walliser, Bernard (1989), “Instrumental Rationality and Cognitive Rationality” Theory and Decision 27 (1–2), 7–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, Robert L. and A.H. Murphy (1968), “Good Probability Assessors” Journal of Applied Meterology 7(4), 751–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaari, Menahem E. (1987), “The Dual Theory of Choice Under Risk”, Econometrica 55 (1), 95116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Munier, B.R. (2001). Market Uncertainty and the Process of Belief Formation. In: Götschl, J. (eds) Evolution and Progress in Democracies. Theory and Decision Library, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1504-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1504-1_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5842-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1504-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics