Abstract
Social Darwinism, the well-known application of Darwin’s theory to explain societal evolution, became discredited because it restricted the complex societal, multicausal evolution exclusively to natural, external selection, adaptation, or, in the words of game theory: to solutions of competitive conflicts between individual interests. According to Dennett (Dennett 1991: 17–28, 520), there looms behind Darwin’s book The origin of species “Darwin’s cultural, most dangerous idea” of evolution as the only creative process we know so far. In this century, this idea received more and more attention; it has greatly enhanced our present understanding of societal evolution. The idea’s dangerous and revolutionary implications are that it proved scientifically and successfully that evolution is not only the creation or self-organization of species but of all physical and chemical forms of matter, of all forms of life, of the human brain, and of its enormous creativity within human societies, cultures, sciences. This idea returned the problem of evolution to the central issue that scientists have been avoiding for too long, to the problem of self-organization and creation. Self-organization begins with the self-organizational processes of physical, chemical-prebiontic, and genetic evolution; it ends with the creativity of the human brain during societal evolution. Especially the coevolution of the evolution of the human brain and of societal evolution in today’s democratic societies is taken seriously by evolutionists and brain physiologists. It will be the main topic of this article because it fostered an increase of human creativity in the twentieth century never known before. Some hypotheses on the dynamic of the sensory and cognitive processing in the brain put forth by the group around Basar will be used in this article.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anthony, M. and Bigs, N. (1992), Computational Learning Theory: An Introduction,Cambridge. Arthur, W. B. (1999), “Complexity and the Economy”, in: Science,Vol. 284.
W. B. (1999), “Complexity and the Economy”, in: Science,Vol. 284.
Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation,New York.
Bak, P. (1996), How Nature Works,New York.
Barrow, J. D. and Tipler, F. (1986), The Anthropic Principle,Oxford.
Basar, E. (1980), EEG-Brain Dynamics,Amsterdam.
Basar, E. (ed.) (1988), Dynamics of Sensory and Cognitive Processing by the Brain,Berlin. Boden, M. A. (1990), The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms,London.
Bunge, M. (1980), The Mind-Body Problem,Oxford.
Chalmers, D. J. (1996), The Conscious Mind,New York.
Churchland, P. S. (1989), Neurophilosophv,Cambridge.
Damasio, A. (1999), The Feeling of what happens,New York.
Damasio, A. (1994), Decartes Error,New York.
Dennett, D. C. (1995), Consciousness Explained,Boston.
Dennett, D. C. (1995), Darwin’s Dangerous Ideas: Evolution and the Meanings of Life,New York..
Eccles, J. (1989), Evolution of the Brain: Creation of the Self London.
Eigen, M. and Schuster, P. (1979), The Hypercycle: A Principle of Natural Self-Organization,Berlin.
Friedman, W. J. (1986), Game Theory with Applications to Economics,New York.
Feigenbaum, J. M. (1978), “Quantitative Universality for a Class of Nonlinear Transformations”, in: bourn. of Stat. Physics, Vol. 19.
Freeman W. J. (1988), “Nonlinear Neural Dynamics in Olfaction as a Model for Cognition”, in: Basar, 1988.
Freeman W. J. (1980), “A Watershed in the Study of Nonlinear Neural Dynamics”, in: Basar, 1988.
Gould, St. (1989), Wonderful Life,New York.
Götschl, J. (ed.) (1993), Revolutionary Changes in Understanding Man and Society. Dordrecht. Götschl, J. (1997), “Self-organization: epistemological and methodological aspects of the unity of reality”, in: Mariani, 1997.
Götschl, J. (1988), “Wissenschaftlicher Fortschritt und Bedingungen für Humanitätsgewinn”, in: Zeitschrift für Wissenschaftsforschung, Vol. 4.
Guth, A. (1997), The Inflationary Universe,Reading.
Güth, W. (1992), Spieltheorie und ökonomische (Bei)Spiele,Berlin.
Haller, R. and Stadler, F. (eds.) (1988), Ernst Mach: Werk und Wirkung,. Wien.
Hawking, St. (1993), Black Holes and Baby Universes,New York.
Helbing, D. (1995), Quantitative Sociodynamics,Dordrecht.
Holland, J. H. (1992), Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems,Cambridge.
Holland, J. H. (1995), Hidden Order. Reading,Massachusetts.
Kauffman, St. (1993), The Origins of Order, New York. Kodex des Österreichischen Rechts (1995), Wien.
Kratky, K. (ed.) (1989), Systemtheorie und Reduktionismus,Wien.
Leinfellner, E. (1992), Semantische Netze und Textzusammenhang,Frankfurt.
Leinfellner, E. (1994a), “Die Negation im monologischen Text: Textzusammenhang und ‘Foregrounding”’, in: Folia Linguistica, Vol. 25.
Leinfellner, E. (1994b), “The Broader Perspective of Negation”, in: Journal of Literary Semantics, Vol. 23.
Leinfellner, E. (1999a), “Rules with Loopholes: A Bayesian Model of Text Evolution”, in press. Leinfellner, E. (1999b), “Der literarische Text als linguistisches und sozialwissenschaftliches Datum: ein adaptives evolutionäres Modell”, in press.
Leinfellner, W. (1984), “Evolutionary Causality and Theory of Games”, in: Wuketits, 1984. Leinfellner, W. (1985), “Reconstruction of Schlick’s Psychosociological Ethics”, in: Synthese, Vol. 64.
Leinfellner, W. (1988a), “The Brain-Wave Model as a Protosemantic Model”, in: Basar, 1998. Leinfellner, W.(1988b), “Physiologie und Psychologie: Ernst Machs ‘Analyse der Empfindungen’, in: Haller and Stadler, 1988.
Leinfellner, W. (1989), “Holismus, Reduktionismus und die Theorie dynamischer Systeme”, in: Kratky, 1989.
Leinfellner, W. (1993), “Ein Plädoyer für die Evolutionäre und die Sozialethik”, in: Lüttersfeld, 1993.
Leinfellner, W. (1995), “Soziale Intelligenz und Rationalität”, in: Zeitschrift für Wissenschaftsforschung, Vol. 9/10.
Leinfellner, W. (ed.). (1997a), Evolution and Decision,Wien.
Leinfellner, W. (1997b), “Empiristische Bemerkungen zu Harsanyis Modell ‘Games with
Incomplete Information’, in: Zeitschrift für Wissenschaftsforschung,Vol. 11/12. Leinfellner, W. and Köhler, E. (eds) (1998), Game Theory, Experience, Rationality,Dordrecht. Lumsden, Ch. J. and Wilson E. O. (1981), Genes, Mind, and Culture,Cambridge.
Lütterfelds, W. (ed.) (1993), Evolutionäre Ethik zwischen Naturalismus und Idealismus,Darmstadt.
Machina, M.J. (1987), “Expected Utility, analysis without the independence axiom”, in: Econometriea 50.
Monod, J. (1970), Le Hasard et la nécessité,Paris.
Munier, B. (1988), Risk, Decision and Rationality,Dordrecht.
McClennen, E. F. (1998), “Rethinking Rational Cooperation” in: Leinfellner and Köhler, 1998. Penrose, R. (1994), Shadows of the Mind, Oxford.
Pinker, St. (1998), Wie das Denken im Kopf entsteht,München.
Popper, K. (1994), Alles Leben ist Problemlösen,München.
Popper, K. and Eccles, J. C. (1997), The Self and its Brain,Berlin.
Prigogine, 1. (1982), Vom Sein zum Werden,München.
Ruelle D. (1991), Chance and Chaos,Princeton.
Searle, J. R. (1980), Minds, Brains and Programs,Cambridge.
Searle, J. R. (1990), The Rediscovery of the Mind,Cambridge.
Selten, R. (1998), “Game Theory, Experience, Rationality”, in: Leinfellner and Köhler, 1998. Sen, A. (1970), Collective Choice and Social Welfare, London.
Sen, A. (1994), On Ethics and Economics,Cambridge.
Simon, H. (1995), “The Theory of Scientific Discovery”, in: Götschl, 1995.
Schuster, P. (1983), “Replicator Dynamics”, in: J. Theor. Biol., Vol. 100.
Schuster, P. Hofbauer, J. and Sigmund, K. (1979), “A Note on Evolutionary Stable Strategies and Game Dynamics”, in: J. Theor. Biology, Vol. 81.
Smith, J. M. (1982), Evolution and the Theory of Games,Cambridge.
Sigmund, K. (1993), Games of Life,New York.
Tulving, E. (1983), Elements of Episodic Memory,New York.
Weibull, J. W. Evolutionary Game Theory,Cambridge.
Wu, G. (1999), “Anxiety and Decision Making with delayed Resolution of Uncertainty”, in: Theory and Decision 46.
Wilson, E. O. (1998), Consilience,New York.
Wuketits, F. M. (ed.) (1984), Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology,Dordrecht. Wuketits, F. M. (1993), Verdammt zur Unmoral?,Munchen.
Wuketits, F. M. (1997), Soziobiologie,Heidelberg.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leinfellner, W. (2001). Towards a Bayesian Theory of Self-Organization, Societal Evolution, Creativity, and the Role of Randomizers in the Societal Evolution. In: Götschl, J. (eds) Evolution and Progress in Democracies. Theory and Decision Library, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1504-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1504-1_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5842-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1504-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive