Skip to main content

Is Moral Philosophy Possible?

Wittgenstein and Anscombe

  • Chapter
Ethics after Anscombe

Part of the book series: Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy ((LOET,volume 5))

  • 175 Accesses

Abstract

As we have seen, Anscombe’s recommendation to moral philosophers is that they put aside moral philosophy, at least for the time being. She does not, though, suggest that ethics in itself is either an impossible practice or an incoherent notion. In this chapter I want to look at some approaches to moral philosophy that she suggests, from those she considers possible but undesirable, to her primary recommendation and then to some secondary remarks sprinkled through “Modern Moral Philosophy” about how, and how not, to do moral philosophy if one were to do so, against her explicit but temporary advice. This will be the concern of the last part of the chapter. The following two chapters will look in more detail at particular ways of doing moral philosophy, specifically those suggested by Sabina Lovibond, Renford Bambrough, Cora Diamond, Iris Murdoch, and Charles Taylor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Wittgenstein, Ludwig Philosophical Investigations,Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1958), translated by G. E. M. Anscombe.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anscombe, G.E.M. An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Lovibond, Sabina, Realism and Imagination in Ethics, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1983) and Bernard Williams, “Left-Wing Wittgenstein, Right-Wing Marx,” in Common Knowledge, Vol.! No.1, Spring 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schulte, Joachim. Wittgenstein, translated by William H. Brenner and John F. Holley, State University of New York Press, Albany, New York (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See William H. Brenner, “Chesterton, Wittgenstein and the Foundations of Ethics,” in Philosophical Investigations, Vol.14 No. 4, October 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wittgenstein, Ludwig Notebooks 1914–1916, edited by G. H. von Wright and G. E. M. Anscombe, translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1979), p. 72e

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wittgenstein, Ludwig Culture and Value,edited by G. H. von Wright in collaboration with Heikki Nyman, translated by Peter Winch, Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1980), p.3e and p.79e.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wittgenstein, Ludwig Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus,translated by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1961), 6.521. The Tractatus, as it is known, consists of seven remarks, numbered 1 — 7, remarks on these remarks, such as 1.1 and 1.2, remarks on these sub-remarks (1.11, 1.12), and so on. As is customary, I will refer to remarks from the Tractatus by number and not give a page reference.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wittgenstein, Ludwig “A Lecture on Ethics,” in Philosophical Occasions, 1912–1951,edited by James C. Klagge and Alfred Nordmann, Hackett, Indianapolis and Cambridge (1993), p.43. Hereafter this lecture will be referred to simply as Lecture

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Conant, J. “Must We Show What We Cannot Say?” in The Senses of Stanley Cavell edited by R. Fleming and M. Payne, Bucknell Review (1989) p.273 footnote 10.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Hare, R.M. Moral Thinking, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1981), p. 139.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Endo, Shusako Silence, translated by William Johnston, Taplinger, New York (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Richter, D. (2000). Is Moral Philosophy Possible?. In: Ethics after Anscombe. Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1478-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1478-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5371-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1478-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics