Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Statutory Controls on Standard Terms Employed in an International Context: Is the Cure Worse than the Disease?

  • Chapter
Essays on International & Comparative Law

  • 159 Accesses

Abstract

Two of Holland’s neighbouring partners in trade and tourism have created new legal instruments for the control of standard terms irr contracts. In the Federal Republic of Germany an Act on Standard Terms of Business, known as AGB — Gesetz, of 1976, codified and amplified the controls, hitherto created by the courts, on standard terms of business.1In the United Kingdom the 1977 Unfair Contract Terms Act 2was adopted; this also regulates and restricts the effect of certain contract terms. The Dutch legislator also took steps in this direction in 1981 by submitting a Bill on General Conditions to Parliament.3

Dr. Jur.; Research Office, European Court of Justice, Luxembourg; Member of the Board of Editors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Act of 9 December 1976, regulating the law of standard terms of business, BGBI. I, 3317, entered into force on 1 April 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Act of 26 October 1977, c. 50, entered into force on 1 February 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bill no. 16 983 (Tw. K. 1981, 16 983, nos. 1 – 3), introduced on 28 July 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. With the exception of s. 5 (misrepresentation) and s. 6 (implied terms in sales and hire purchases).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Hartkamp, Vers un nouveau Code civil n é erlandais. Rev. int. dr. comp. 1982, p. 319.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Author’s translation. The English translation of ss. 1 – 13 of the Act in 26 AJCL (1978), p. 568, has not been followed as it does not appear to be wholly accurate, cf. n. 11 infra.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See among the numerous articles, Drobnig, AGB im internationalen Handelsverkehr, in Internationales Recht und Wirtschafsordnung(Festschrift Mann), 1977, p. 591; Landfermann, AGB-Gesetz und Auslandgeschà’fte, RIW 1977, p. 445; Jayme, Allgemeine Gesch ä ftsbedingungen und internationales Privatrecht, 142 ZHR (1978), p. 105 (115 et seq.); Sonnenberger, Bemerkungen zum Internationales Privatrecht im AGB-Gesetz, in Konflikt und Ordnung(Festschrift Ferid), 1978, p. 377; Stoll, Internationalprivatrechtliche Probleme bei Verwendung Allgemeiner Gesch ä ftsbedingungen, in Festschrift Beitzke, 1979, p. 759; H ü bner, Allgemeine Gesch ä ftsbedingungen und Internationales Privatrecht, NJW 1980, p. 2601.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Jayme 116; Sonnenberger 381.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cf. Kegel, Internationales Privatrecht(4th ed. 1977), p. 296; Sonnenberger 380 and cf. Stoll 776 – 777.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sonnenberger 382.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Author’s translation; the translation in AJCL, supran. 6, translates ber ü cksichtigenin the opening clause as “to apply”, thus disguising one of the main problems inherent in this text. — The Act’s territory includes Berlin (s. 29).

    Google Scholar 

  12. See the explanatory note, Bundesrat doc. 360/75, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Sonnenberger 384 with references.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jayme 119, Palandt- Heldrich, BGB (41st ed. 1982), p. 2393, comment 3 on Art. 12; contra, e.g., Schlosser et al, Kommentar zum AGB-Gesetz(1977), p. 562, Note 8 to Art. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Drobnig 610 (“besonderes Fingerspitzengef ü hl”).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Landfermann 449.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Act of 28 July 1968, BGBl. I, 986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cf. the Second Report of the Law Commissions on Exemption clauses in Contracts (Law Com. No. 69, Scot. Law Com. No. 39), 1975, p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Morris, Statutes in the Conflict of Laws, in Multum non multa(Festschrift Lipstein), 1980, p. 187, at 194, 204; id., The Conflict of Lam(2nd ed. 1980), p. 224.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See the Report, supran. 18, para. 232.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mann, The proposed new law of exemption clauses and the conflict of laws, 26 ICLQ (1977; Essays in honour of J.H.C. Morris), p. 903, at 908, 911 (quotation); see also id, Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and the conflict of laws, 27 ICLQ (1978), p. 661.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mann, 27 ICLQ (1978), at 662.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See Cheshire and North, Private International Law(10th ed. 1979), pp. 234 – 235; Mann, previous note.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cheshire and North, previous note, at 235 and n. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mann, 27 ICLQ (1978), at 663.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Triebel, Das englische Gesetz ü ber unbillige Vertragsklauseln von 1977, RIW 1978, p. 353, at 358.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cheshire and North, supran. 23, at 235 and n. 5, do not allow for that consequence.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Author’s translation.

    Google Scholar 

  29. OJ of the EC of 9 October 1980, No. L 266/1; see further infra, ch. 4.1.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Doc. 16 983 No. 3, at 66 – 67.

    Google Scholar 

  31. HR 13 May 1966, NJ 1967, 3, 15 NILR (1968), p. 82 note Deelen, Rev. crii d.i.p. 1967, p. 522 note Struycken, Clunet 1969, p. 1010.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See supra, n. 30. The memorandum mistakenly refers to s. 26 of the British Act, instead of s. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. 24(1) provides, inter alia, that ss. 10 and 12 do not apply to commercial transactions.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cf. the analysis in Imhoff-Scheier, Protection du consommateur et contrats internatio-naux(Etudes suisses de droit international, vol. 22), 1981, pp. 65 – 67, whose discussion of s. 26 and its relationship to s. 27(2) is, however, not entirely clear to me.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Drobnig, supran. 7, at 611 – 612.

    Google Scholar 

  36. See Cheshire and North, supra n. 23, at 233 – 234.

    Google Scholar 

  37. In this sense apparently Imhoff-Scheier, supran. 34, at 67 and n. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hall, International sales and the Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1973, 22 ICLQ (1973), p. 740, at 744.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Thus Mann, 27 ICLQ (1978),at 664.

    Google Scholar 

  40. In particular see Lando, The EC,Draft Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual and Non-Contractual Obligations, RabelsZ 1974, p. 6; von Hoffmann, ü ber den Schutz des Schw ä cheren bei internationalen SchuldvertrSgen, ibid., p. 396.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations, OJ of the EC of 9 October 1980, No. L 266/1; Report by Giuliano and Lagarde, OJ of 31 October 1980, No. C 282/1.

    Google Scholar 

  42. See above all, Lando, von Hoffmann and Siehr (eds.), European Private International Law of Obligations(1975), passim, and especially Drobnig, Comments on Art. 7 of the Draft Convention, p. 82; Batiffol, Le project de Convention CEE sur la loi applicable aux obligations contractuelles et non-contractuelles, Rev. trim. dr. eur. 1975, p. 181.

    Google Scholar 

  43. See, among others, Pocfar, Kodifìcation der Kollisionsnormen auf dem Gebiet des Vertragsrechts im Rahmen der Europ ä ischen Gemeinschaften, RIW 1979, p. 384, at 391; North, The EEC Convention on the Law applicable to Contractual Obligations, J.Bus.L. 1980, p. 382, at 387; Haak, Nieuw internationaal overeenkomstenrecht, WPNR 1980, p. 865, at 902.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Art. 22(l)(a).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Actes et Documents, 1976 – 1, p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  46. See the Final Act, p. 34, reproduced in 27 NILR (1980), p. 408.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Prelim. Doc. No. 2, June 1979, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  48. See Schedule No. 2, under c: “(regard is to be had) whether the customer knew or ought reasonably to have known of the existence and the extent of the term (having regard, among other things, to any custom of the trade and any previous course of dealing between the parties)”.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Art 2.2(a) of the proposed new title.

    Google Scholar 

  50. See von Hoffmann, supran. 40; Vischer, The Antagonism between Legal Certainty and the Search for Justice in the Field of Contracts. 129 Recueil des Cours (1974 II). p. 1, 42 – 44; Landò, International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, III, ch. 24 (Contracts), ss. 249 – 252; Kropholler, Das kollisionsrechtliche System des Schutzes der schw ä cheren Vertragspartei, RabelsZ 1978, p. 634.

    Google Scholar 

  51. See Ehrenzweig, Adhesion Contracts in the Conflict of Laws, 53 Colum.L.Rey. (1953) 1072; Jessurun d’Oliveira, Internationaal overeenkomstenrecht, Mededelingen Ned. Ver. Int. Recht

    Google Scholar 

  52. no. 71 (1975), p. 71, 104, also in “Characteristic Obligation” In The Draft EEC Obligation Convention, 25 AJCL (1977), p. 303, 318; Vitta, Diritto Internationale Privato, HI (1975), pp. 429 – 435.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Drobnig, supra.n. 7, at 609 n. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Based on the author’s research.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Imhoff-Scheier, supran. 34, at 56 – 58.

    Google Scholar 

  56. In this sense also see Sealy, The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, 37 Camb.L.J. (1978), p. 15, at 20.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Cf. on the settlement by arbitration Hondius’ contribution to this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Cf. for the first two types, Lombois, Report on French private international law, in La protection du consommateur, 24 Travaux de l’Association Henri Capitant (1973), p. 441, at 456; Duintjer Tebbens, International Product Liability(1979), p. 367; Sauveplanne, Het toepasselijk recht op de internationale koop van roerende lichamelijke zaken, NJB 1979, p. 693, at 699.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Cf. Art. 3(2) of the 1955 Hague Sales Convention.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Cf. Duintjer Tebbens, supran. 57, at 168 and StolTs discussion, supran. 7, at 767 – 772; see also Arts. 3(4) and 8(1) of the EEC Convention.

    Google Scholar 

  61. See Prelim. Doc. No.1, January 1979, by Pelichet, p. 18 – 19, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Art. 5(2) in fineof the EEC Convention, Art. 5(4) of the Hague text.

    Google Scholar 

  63. The term is referred to in the commentaries on the AGB-Gesetz.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Art. 3 sub p of the proposed new title.

    Google Scholar 

  65. See for the text of the amended Convention, OJ of the EC, No. L 304/77 of 30 October 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Art. 14(1).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Zweigert, Zur Armut des IPR an sozialen Werten, RabelsZ 1973, p. 435.

    Google Scholar 

  68. See the writers cited in n. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Cf. North, supran. 43, at 388, who considers the special rules for consumer contracts to be “a new and not wholly desirable development”.

    Google Scholar 

  70. See, e.g., Arts. 3(3) and 4(5) of the EEC Convention.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Vischer, supran. 50, at 53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. H. Duintjer Tebbens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tebbens, H.D. (1983). Statutory Controls on Standard Terms Employed in an International Context: Is the Cure Worse than the Disease?. In: Essays on International & Comparative Law. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1468-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1468-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-1470-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1468-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation