Skip to main content

From Necessity to Possibility

  • Chapter
Eros and Eris

Part of the book series: Phaenomenologica ((PHAE,volume 127))

  • 159 Accesses

Summary

In this essay an effort is made to develop the thesis that over the past 400 years in the West we have witnessed a gradual shift from a preoccupation with necessity in the direction of a preoccupation with the possible. It is suggested that between 1600 and 1950 people in the West have gradually come to appeal to the category of the possible where formerly, to some degree under the influence of ideas first developed by the ancient Greeks and Romans, one would have used the category of necessity to articulate one’s conception of the world and of one’s own self. This basic thesis is illustrated and justified by reflections on classical physics and rationalist moral theories on the one hand, and quantum mechanics and hermeneutic moral theories on the other. In view of the fact that at first sight Kant’s approach to science and the moral order seem to be in conflict with the basic thesis proposed here, Kant’s ideas have been given a special place in the argument.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Cf. Ernest Nagel, The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. London (Routledge and Kegan Paul), 1961, pp. 278–279.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pierre Laplace, Théorie analytique des probabilités Paris (Courcier), 1820. Preface. (Quoted in Nagel, op. cit.,pp. 281–282.)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Christian Wolff, Verniinfftige Gedancken von der Menschen Thun und Lassen, zu Beförderung ihrer Glückseeligkeit,in Gesammelte Werke,ed. J. Ecole, J. Hofmann, M. Thomann, and H. Arndt. Abt. I, Bd. 4, ed. H. W. Arndt. Hildesheim (Olms), 1976, Sect. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., Sect. 14 and 15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid, Sect. 16 and 17.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid., Sect. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., Sect. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. David Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford (Clarendon Press), 1960, p. 400.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., pp. 410–411.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Immanuel Kant, Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können,in Kants gesammelte Schriften,ed. Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 1900–1942, Bd. 4, ed. Benno Erdmann, Sect. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., Sect. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, in Kants gesammelte Schriften,Bd. 3, B 197.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid., Bd. 4, B. 472, 518, 561, and passim.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Immanuel Kant, Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten,in Kants gesammelte Schriften,Bd. 4, B. 447.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft,in Kants gesammelte Schriften,Bd. 5, Sect. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid., Sect. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. For the preceding cf. Lewis White Beck, A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago (The University of Chicago Press), 1984, pp. 116–124, and passim.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cf. Kurt Hübner, Kritik der wissenschaftlichen Vernunft. Freiburg (Alber), 1978, pp. 3454, 138–167.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Joseph J. Kockelmans, `Einheit und Vielheit in Sittlichkeit und Sittenlehre’. In: Odo Marquard, ed., Einheit und Vielheit. Hamburg (Meiner), 1990, pp. 36–53. Cf. also Hermeneutik und Ethik’. In: W. Kuhlmann and D. Köhler, eds., Kommunikation und Reflexion. Frankfurt (Suhrkamp), 1982, pp. 649–684; `The Foundations of Morality and the Human Sciences’. In: Analecta Husserliana, 15 (1983), pp. 369–386.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Paul van Tongeren Paul Sars Chris Bremmers Koen Boey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kockelmans, J.J. (1992). From Necessity to Possibility. In: van Tongeren, P., Sars, P., Bremmers, C., Boey, K. (eds) Eros and Eris. Phaenomenologica, vol 127. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1464-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1464-8_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4189-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1464-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics