Abstract
Is the correspondence principle valid for quantum systems whose classical counterparts are chaotic? This question has been at the center of a debate that has taken place in recent years within the community of scientists interested in quantum chaos [4,17–20,33]. In this paper we will argue that the apparent failure of the correspondence principle is cured by decoherence, which is an essential ingredient to properly define a classical limit. We shall begin by schematically presenting the problem. Subsequently, we shall sketch the solution provided by decoherence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
G. Casati and B. V. Chirikov, Comment on Decoherence, chaos and the second law, Phys. Rev. Lett, 75, 1995, p. 350.
W. H. Zurek and J. P. Paz, Reply to Casati and Chirikov, Phys. Rev. Lett, 75, 1995, p. 351.
G. R Berman and G. M. Zaslaysky, Physica, A91, 1978, p. 450.
see M. B. Berry, “Introductory remarks”, in Adriatico Research Conference and Miniworkshop on Quantum Chaos, edited by H. A. Cerdeira et al., Singapore: Word Scientific 1991.
J. Wisdom, Icarus, 72, 1987, p. 241.
S. Habib, K. Shizum and W.H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. Lett, 80, 1998, p. 4361.
W.H. Zurek, J.P. Paz, Physica, D83, 1995, p. 300.
J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek, Quantum Theory and Measurement, Princeton University Press: Princeton 1983.
J. J. Halliwell, J. Perez-Mercader, and W. H. Zurek, Eds., Physical Origins of Time Asymmetry, Cambridge University Press 1994.
R. Busch, P. Lahti, and R. Mittelstaedt, eds., Quantum Measurements, Irreversibility, and the Physics of Information, World Scientific: Singapore 1994.
W. H. Zurek, Physics Today, 44, 1991, p. 36.
W. H. Zurek, Prog. Theor. Phys. 89, 1993, p. 281.
W. H. Zurek, S. Habib and J.P. Paz, Phys. Rev. Lett., 70, 1993, p. 1187.
W. H. Zurek and J. P. Paz, Phys. Rev. Lett, 72, 1994, p. 2508.
J. R. Paz, S. Habib and W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev, D 47, 1993, p. 488.
B. L. Hu, J. P. Paz and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev, D 45, 1992, p.2843; ibid, D 47, 1993, p. 1576.
B.V. Chirikov, Phys. Rep, 52, 1979, p.263; G. M. Zaslaysky, Phys. Rep, 80, 1981, p.157; M-J. Giannoni, A. Voros, J. Zinn-Justin, Eds., Chaos and Quantum Physics, Les Houches Lectures LII, Amsterdam: North Holland 1991.
J. Ford and G. Mantica, Am. J. Phys, 60, 1992, p. 1086.
See, e.g. G. Ioos, R. H. G. Hellmann and R. Stora Eds., Chaotic Behavior in Deterministic Systems, Les Houches Lectures XXXVI, Amsterdam: North Holland 1983; R. S. Mc Kay and J. O. Meiss Eds., Hamiltonian Dynamical Systems, Philadelphia: Hilger 1987.
M. B. Berry, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A413, 1987, p.183; M. Gutzwiller, Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics, New York: Springer Verlag 1990; F. Haake, Quantum Signature of Chaos, New York: Springer Verlag 1990, and references therein.
W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev, D24, 1981, p.1516; ibid, D26, 1982, p. 1862.
E. Joos and H. D. Zeh, Zeits. Phys, B59, 1985, p. 229.
W. H. Zurek, Physics Today, 46, 1993, p. 81.
W. H. Zurek, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, A356, 1999, p. 1793.
W.H. Zurek, Physica Scripta, T76, 1998, p. 186.
W. H. Zurek, pp. 145–149 in Frontiers of Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics, G. T. Moore and M. O. Scully Eds., New York: Plenum 1986.
M. Gell-Mann and J. B. Hartle, Phys. Rev., D47, 1993, p. 3345.
A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, Physica, 121A, 1993, p.587; W. G. Unruh and W. H. Zurek, Phys Rev., D40, 1989, p. 1071; B. L. Hu, J. P. Paz and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev., D45, 1992, p.2843; ibid, D47, 1993, p. 1576.
W. H. Louise11, Quantum Statistical Properties of Radiation, New York: Wiley 1973.
J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, English translation by R. T. Beyer, Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press 1955); H. D. Zeh, The Direction of Time, New York: Springer—Verlag 1991.
D.H. Feng, B.L. Hug (Eds.), Quantum-Classical Correspondence, Cambridge: International Press 1997. J. M. Blatt expressed a similar suspicion in a compelling, although less rigorous and completely classical paper, Progr. Theor. Phys., 22, 1959, p. 745.
G.J. Milburn and C.A. Holmes, Phys. Rev. Lett., 56, 1986, p. 2237.
G. Casati, B. V. Chirikov, F. M. Izraileev and J. Ford, Lectures Notes in Physics, 93, New York: Springer—Verlag 1979.
T. Dittrich and R. Graham, Z.,/ür Phys., B62, 1986, p.515; T. Dittrich and R. Graham, Ann. Phys. (NY), 200, 1990, p.363; T. Dittrich and R. Graham, “Quantum chaos in open systems”, in Information Dynamics, H. Atmanspacher and H. Scheingraber, Eds., NATO ASI Series„ B256, 289, Plenum 1990, and references therein.
M. Hillery, R.F. O’Connell, M.O. Scully and E. Wigner, Phys. Rep, 106, 1984, p. 121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zurek, W.H., Paz, J.P. (1999). Why We Don’t Need Quantum Planetary Dynamics: Decoherence and the Correspondence Principle for Chaotic Systems. In: Greenberger, D., Reiter, W.L., Zeilinger, A. (eds) Epistemological and Experimental Perspectives on Quantum Physics. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [1999], vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1454-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1454-9_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5354-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1454-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive