Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [1999] ((VCIY,volume 7))

Abstract

The Society for the Advancement of the Scientific World Conception has done me a great honor by inviting me to be the Sixth Vienna Circle Lecturer. The invitation has also stirred some deep emotions. A central figure of the Vienna Circle, Rudolf Carnap, was my revered teacher of philosophy at the University of Chicago in 1948–9 and later an informal adviser when I wrote a doctoral thesis at Yale University on inductive logic, and he was a friend during those years and thereafter. I was not a disciple, but Carnap did not demand discipleship as a condition for admission to his seminars or to his friendship. He seemed to be baffled by the fact that despite my interest in mathematical logic and theoretical physics I proclaimed myself a metaphysicician and had even published an article in the first issue of The Review of Metaphysics. Carnap (1937, pp. 51–52) formulated a “principle of tolerance” as a philosophical maxim concerning rules of language (“in logic, there are no morals”), but he practiced a human and highly moral version of the principle of tolerance in his profoundly liberal social commitments and in his relations with his students. If he were here tonight, I would wish for his tolerance of the lapses of rigor and the flights of speculation to which he would be exposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • John S. Bell, “On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics”, in: Reviews of Modern Physics 38, 1966, pp. 447–452. Reprinted in: J.S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • John S. Bell, “On the Einstein-Podosky-Rosen Paradox”, in: Physics 1, 1964, pp. 195–200. Reprinted in: J.S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Max Black, “Self-supporting Inductive Arguments”, in: Journal of Philosophy 55, 1958, pp. 718–725. Richard Boyd, “On the Current Status of Scientific Realism”, in: Erkenntnis 19, 1983, pp. 45–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reprinted in: R. Boyd, P. Gasper, and J.D. Trout (eds.), The Philosophy of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolf Carnap, Logical Syntax of Language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul 1937. Rudolf Carnap, Continuum of Inductive Methods. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolf Carnap, Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1950, 1962 (second edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolf Carnap, Hans Hahn, and Otto Neurath, Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis. Wien: Artur Wolf Verlag 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolf Carnap and Richard Jeffrey, Studies in Probability and Inductive Logic, vol. 1. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lajos Diosi, “Quantum Stochastic Processes as Models for State Vector Reduction”, in: Journal of Physics A 21, 1988, pp. 2885–2898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippe Eberhard, “Bell’s Theorem and Different Concepts of Locality”, in: Nuovo Cimento 4613, 1978, pp. 392–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugh Everett III, “’Relative State’ Formulation of Quantum Mechanics”, in: Reviews of Modern Physics 29, 1957, pp. 454–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenneth Friedman, Predictive Simplicity. Oxford: Pergamon 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray Gell-Mann and James B. Hartle, “Classical Equations for Quantum Systems”, in: Physical Review D47, 1993, pp. 3345–3382.

    Google Scholar 

  • GianCarlo Ghirardi, Alberto Rimini, and Tullio Weber, “A General Argument Against Superluminal Transmission through the Quantum Mechanical Measurement Process”, in: Lettere al Nuovo Cimento 27, 1980, pp. 293–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • GianCarlo Ghirardi, Alberto Rimini, and Tullio Weber, “Unified Dynamics of Microscopic and Macroscopic Systems”, in: Physical Review D34, 1986. pp. 470–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolas Gisin, “Quantum Measurements and Stochastic Processes”, in: Physical Review Letters 52, 1984, 1657–1660.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.M. Gleason, “Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space”, in: Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 6, 1957, pp. 885–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurt Gödel, Collected Works, vols. 2 and 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1990, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert Griffiths, “Consistent Histories and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics”, in: Journal of Statistical Mechanics 36, 1984, pp. 219–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner Heisenberg, Physics and Philosophy. New York: Harper 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard Jeffrey, The Logic of Decision (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1983. Joergen Joergensen, The Development of Logical Empiricism (International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, vol. II, no. 9 ). Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • William Ernest Johnson, Logic (part III). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Kärolyhäzy, A. Frenkel, and B. Lukács, “On the Possible Role of Gravity in the Reduction of the Wave Packet”, in: R. Penrose and C. Isham (Eds.), Quantum Concepts in Space and Time. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1986, pp. 109–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Maynard Keynes, A Treatise on Probability. London: Macmillan 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kochen and E.P. Specker, “The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics”, in: Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17, 1967, pp. 59–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst Mach, The Science of Mechanics (transi. T. J. McCormack, 4th ed. ). Chicago: Open Court 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. David Mermin, “What is Quantum Mechanics trying to Tell Us?”, in: American Journal of Physics 66, 1998, pp. 753–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Stuart Mill, A System of Logic (8th ed.) London: Longmans, Green 1872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto Neurath, “Protokollsätze”, in: Erkenntnis 3, 1932, pp. 204–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland Omnès, “Consistent Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics”, in: Reviews of Modern Physics 64, 1992, pp. 339–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Don Page, “The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Reality is Completely Described by Quantum Mechanics”, in: Physics Letters 91A, 1982, pp. 57–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philip Pearle, “Combining Stochastic Dynamical State-Vector Reduction with Spontaneous Localization”, in: Physical Review A 39, 1989, pp. 227–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger Penrose, “Gravity and State-Vector Reduction”, in: R. Penrose and C. Isham (eds.), Quantum Concepts in Space and Time. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1986, pp. 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandu Popescu and Daniel Rohrlich, “Action and Passion at a Distance”, in: R.S. Cohen, M. Horne, and J. Stachel (eds.), Potentiality, Entanglement, and Passion-at-a-Distance. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willard V.O. Quine, Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand Russell, The Analysis of Matter. London: Allen and Unwin 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin Schroedinger, “Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems”, in: Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 31, 1935, pp. 555–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y.H. Shih, A.V. Sergienko, T.B. Pittman, and M.H. Rubin, “EPR and Two-photon Interference Experiments Using Type-II Parametric Downconversion”, in: D.M. Greenberger and A. Zeilinger (eds.), Fundamental Problems in Quantum Theory. New York: New York Academy of Sciences 1995, pp. 40–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abner Shimony, “Scientific Inference”, in: R.G. Colodny (ed.), The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories.Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press 1971, pp. 79–172. Reprinted in: A. Shimony, Search for a Naturalistic World View (vol. 1 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard Stein, “Newtonian Space-Time”, in: The Texas Quarterly 10, autumn 1967, pp. 174–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard Stein, The Notion of Field in Newton, Maxwell, and Beyond“, in: R.B. Steuwer (ed.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 5). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 1970, pp. 299–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul Teller, “Shimony’a A Priori Arguments for Tempered Personalism”, in: G. Maxwell and R.M. Anderson, Justification, Probability, and Confirmation (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 6 ). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 1975, pp. 166–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao Wang, Reflections on Kurt Gödel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao Wang, A Logical Journey: From Gödel to Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996. X.Y. Zou, L.J. Wang, and L. Mandel, “Induced Coherence and Indistinguishability in Optical Interference”, in: Physical Review Letters 67, 1991, pp. 318–321.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shimony, A. (1999). Philosophical and Experimental Perspectives on Quantum Physics. In: Greenberger, D., Reiter, W.L., Zeilinger, A. (eds) Epistemological and Experimental Perspectives on Quantum Physics. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [1999], vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1454-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1454-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5354-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1454-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics