Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Log-Pearson Type III Distribution

  • Chapter
Entropy-Based Parameter Estimation in Hydrology

Part of the book series: Water Science and Technology Library ((WSTL,volume 30))

Abstract

The log-Pearson type 3 (LP3) distribution has been one of the most frequently used distributions for hydrologic frequency analyses since the recommendation of the Water Resources Council (1967, 1982) of the United States as to its use as the base method. The Water Resources Council also recommended that this distribution be fitted to sample data by using mean, standard deviation and coefficient of skewness of the logarithms of flow data [i.e., the method of moments (MOM)]. A large volume of literature on the LP3 distribution has since been published with regard to its accuracy and methods of fitting or parameter estimation. McMahon and Srikanthan (1981) and Srikanthan and McMahon (1981) examined the applicability of LP3 distribution to Australian rivers and questioned the assumption of setting to zero the coefficient of skewness of logarithms of peak discharges that were not statistically different from zero. They evaluated the effect of sample size, distribution parameters and dependence on peak annual flood estimates. Gupta and Deshpande (1974) applied LP3 distribution to evaluate design earthquake magnitudes. Phien and Jivajirajah (1984) applied LP3 distribution to annual maximum rainfall, annual streamflow and annual rainfall. Wallis and Wood (1985) found, based on Monte Carlo experiments, that the flood quantile estimates obtained by using an index flood type approach with either a generalized extreme value distribution or a Wakeby distribution fitted by PWM were superior to those obtained by LP3 distribution with MOM -based parameters. This finding was challenged later by several investigators (Beard, 1986; Landwehr et al., 1986).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arora, K. and Singh, V.P., 1987a. A comparative evaluation of the estimators of commonly used flood frequency models: 1. Monte Carlo simulation. Completion Report, Louisiana Water Resources Research Institute, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, K. and Singh, V.P., 1987b. A comparative evaluation of the estimators of commonly used flood frequency models: 2. Computer programs. Completion Report, Louisiana Water Resources Research Institute, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, K. and Singh, V.P., 1988. On the method of maximum likelihood estimation for log-Pearson type 3 distribution. Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 156–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, K. and Singh, V.P., 1989a. A comparative evaluation of the estimators of the log Pearson type (LP) 3 distribution. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 105, pp. 9–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, K. and Singh, V.P., 1989b. A note on the mixed moment estimation for the log-Pearson type 3 distribution. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India), Civil Engineering Division, Vol. 69, Part C15, pp. 298–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashkar, F. and Bobee, B., 1987. The generalized method of moments as applied to problems of flood frequency analysis: Some practical results for the log-Pearson type 3 distribution. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 90, pp. 199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashkar, F. and Bobee, B., 1988. Confidence intervals for flood events under a Pearson 3 or log Pearson 3 distribution. Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 639–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beard, L.R., 1986. Comment on “Relative accuracy of log Pearson III procedures by J.R. Wallis and E.F. Wood.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 112, pp. 1205–1206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M.A., 1968. Uniform flood-frequency estimating methods for federal agencies. Water Resources Research, Vol. 4, No. 5, pp. 891–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobee, B., 1975. The log Pearson type 3 distribution and its application in hydrology. Water Resources Research, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 681–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobee, B. and Ashkar, F., 1988. Generalized method of moments applied to LP3 distribution. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 114, N. 8, pp. 899–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobee, B. and Ashkar, F., 1991. The Gamma Family and Derived Distribution Applied in Hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobee, B., Cavadias, G., Ashkar, F., Bernier, J. And Rasmussen, P., 1993. Towards a systematic approach to comparing distributions used in flood frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 142, pp. 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobee, B. and Robitaille, R., 1975. Correction of bias in the estimation of the coefficient of skewness. Water Resources Research, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 851–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, T.A., Lane, W.L. and Baier, W.G., 1997. An algorithm for computing moments-based flood quantile estimates when historical flood information is available. Water Resources Research, Vol. 33, No. 9, pp. 2089–2096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condie, R., 1977. The log Pearson type 3 distribution: The T-year event and its asymptotic standard method by maximum likelihood theory. Water Resources Research, Vol. 13, pp. 987–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, I.D. and Deshpande, V.C., 1994. Appliation of log-Pearson type-Ili distribution for evaluating design earthquake magnitudes. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India), Civil Engineering Division, Vol. 75, pp. 129–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haktanir, T., 1991. Statistical modelling of annual maximum flows in Turkish rivers. Hydrological Sciences Journal, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 367–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshi, K. And Burges, S.J., 1981a. Approximate estimation of the derivative of a standard gamma quantile for use in cinfidence interval estimates. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 53, pp. 317–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshi, K. and Burges, S.J., 198 lb. Sampling properties of parameter estimates for the log Pearson type 3 distribution using moments in real space. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 53, pp. 305–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kite, G.F. 1978. Frequency and Risk Analyses in Hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuczera, G., 1982a. Combining site-specific and regional information: An empirical Bayes approach. Water Resources Research, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 306–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuczera, G., 1982b. Robust flood frequency models. Water Resources Research, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 315–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landwehr, J.M., Matals, N.C. and Wallis, J.R., 1978. Some comparison of flood statistics in real and log space. Water Resources Research, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 902–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landwehr, J.M., Tasker, G.D. and Jarret, R.D., 1986. Comment on “Relative accuracy of log Pearson III procedures by J.R. Wallis and E.F. Wood.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 112, pp. 1206–1210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loganathan, G.V., Mattejat, P., Kuo, C.Y. and Diskin, M.H., 1986. Frequency analysis of low flows: Hypothetical distribution methods and a physically based approach. Nordic Hydrology, Vol. 17, pp. 129–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, T.A. and Srikanthan, R., 1981. Log Pearson III distribution-Is it applicable to flod frequency analysis of Australian streams? Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 52, pp. 139–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nozdryn-Plotinicki, M.J. and Watt, W.E., 1979. Assessment of fitting techniques for the log Pearson type 3 distribution using Monte Carlo simulation. Water Resources Research, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 714–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberg, K.A. and Mades, D.M., 1987. Estimating generalized skew of the log-Pearson type III distribution. Water Resources Investigations Report 86–4009, 42 pp., U.S. Geological Survey, Urbana, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouarda, T.B.M. and Ashkar, F., 1998. Effect of trimming on LP III flood quantile estimates. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phien, H.N. and Hira, M.A., 1983. Log Pearson type-3 distribution: Parameter Estimation. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 64, pp. 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phien, H.N. and Hsu, L.C., 1985. Variance of the T-year event in the log Pearson type 3 distribution. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 77, pp. 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phien, H.N. and Jivajirajah, T., 1984. Application of the log Pearson type-3 distribution in hydrology. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 73, pp. 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilon, P.J. and Adamowski, K., 1993. Asymptotic variance of flood quantile in log Pearson type III distribution with historical information. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 143, pp. 481–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, D.V., 1980a. Log Pearson type 3 distribution: Method of mixed moments. Journal of Hydraulics Division, ASCE, Vol. 106, No. HY6, pp. 999–1019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, D.V., 1980b. Log Pearson type 3 distribution: A generalized evaluation. Journal of Hydraulics Division, ASCE, Vol. 106, No. HY5, pp. 853–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, D.V., 1981. Three-parameter probability distribution. Journal of Hydraulics Division, ASCE, Vol. 107, No. HY3, pp. 339–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, D.V., 1983a. Estimating log Pearson parameters by mixed moments. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 109, No. 8, pp. 1118–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, D.V., 1983b. Three-parameter probability distributions. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, ASCE, Vol. 107, No. HY3, pp. 339–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, D. V., 1988. Estimating extreme events: Log Pearson type 3 distribution. Chapter 9 in Civil Engineering Practice: Water Resources and Environmental Management, edited by P.N. Cheremisinoff, N.C. Cheremisinoff and S.L. Cheng, Vol. 5, pp. 291–304, Technomic Publishing Company, Inc., Lancaster, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, B.M., 1970. Flood series compared to rainfall extremes. Water Resources Research, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 1655–1667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, F., Fiorentino, M. and Versace, P., 1984. Two-component extreme value distribution for flood frequency analysis. Water Resources Research, Vol. 20, pp. 847–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, H.W., Bryson, M.C. and Ochoa, I.D., 1980. Effect of tail behavior assumptions on flood predictions. Water Resources Research, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 361–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V.P. and Singh, K., 1988. Parameter estimation for log-Pearson type III distribution by POME. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 114, No. 1, pp. 112–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, D. and Ding, J., 1988. The application of probability weighted moments in estimating the parameters of the Pearson type three distribution. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 101, pp. 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srikanthan, R. and McMahon, T.A., 1981. Log Pearson III distribution-Effect of dependence, distribution parameters and sample size on peak annual flood estimates. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 52, pp. 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasker, G.D., 1987. A comparison of methods for estimating low flow characteristics of streams. Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 1077–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tung, K.T. and Mays, L.W., 1981. Generalized skew coefficients for flood frequency analysis. Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 262–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, R.M., Thomas, W.O. and McMahon, T.A., 1992. Flood-flow frequency model selection in southwestern United States. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 119, No. 3, pp. 353–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, J.R. and Wood, E.F., 1985. Relative accuracy of log Pearson III procedures. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 111, No. 7, pp. 1043–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Water Resources Council, 1967. A uniform technique for determining flood flow frequencies. Bulletin No. 15, 15 pp., Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Resources Council, 1982. Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency. Bulletin 17 B, Hydrology Subcommittee, Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Water Resources Program, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, USA

    Vijay P. Singh

Authors
  1. Vijay P. Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Singh, V.P. (1998). Log-Pearson Type III Distribution. In: Entropy-Based Parameter Estimation in Hydrology. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1431-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1431-0_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5089-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1431-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation