Advertisement

The Effects of Group Support Systems Usage Over Time

An Exploratory Field Study
Chapter
Part of the Educational Innovation in Economics and Business book series (EIEB, volume 7)

Abstract

The combination of groupware with high performance teams is a natural pairing since the fundamental goal of groupware is to support the work performed by groups and teams. Therefore the study of groups and how group members work together is central to groupware’s continuing development and understanding. Throughout this development process, field studies help identify significant characteristics.

Keywords

Management Information System Group Support System Manual Meeting Individual Team Member Electronic Meeting System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aranda, E.K., Aranda, L., and Conlon, K. (1998). Teams: Structure, Process, Culture and Politics. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Ayre, R., and Gottesman, B. (1994). The Changing Office, PC Magazine, Vol. 13, No. 11, June 14, 171–184.Google Scholar
  3. Benbasat, I., and Lim, L.H. (1993). The Effects of Group, Task, Context and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  4. Variables on the Usefulness of Group Support Systems, Small Group Research, Vol. 24,No. 4, November.Google Scholar
  5. Briggs, R.O., Nunamaker, Jr. J.F., and Sprague, Jr. R.H. (1998). 1001 Unanswered ResearchGoogle Scholar
  6. Questions in GSS, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 14,No. 3, Winter.Google Scholar
  7. Couger, D. (1995). Creative Problem Solving and Opportunity Finding,Boyd and Fraser.Google Scholar
  8. Fjermestad, J., and Hiltz, S.R. (1999). An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 15, No. 3, Winter.Google Scholar
  9. Fox, W.M. (1986). Effective Group Problem Solving, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  10. Gopal, A., Bostrom, R.P., and Chin, W.W. (1993). Adaptive Structuration Theory and Group Support Systems Use. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 9, No. 3.Google Scholar
  11. Grohowski, R., McGoff, C., Vogel, D., Martz,B., and Nunamaker, Jr. J.F. (1990). Implementing Electronic Meeting Systems at IBM: Lessons Learned and Success Factors, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 14, 368–382.Google Scholar
  12. Hammer, M., and Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the Corporation,Harper Business Publications, p. 109–114.Google Scholar
  13. IBM. (1995). QIT Effectiveness Training Workbook, Owego, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Janson, R. (1992). How Engineering Transforms Organizations to Satisfy Customers, National Productivity Review, Vol. 11, 45–53.Google Scholar
  15. Jessup, L.M., and Valacich, J.S. (1993). eds., Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, Macmillan Publishing Co. New York.Google Scholar
  16. Johansen, R., and Swigart, R. (1994). Upsizing the Individual in the Downsized Organization,Addison Wesley, p. 18–10.Google Scholar
  17. Katzenbach, J.R., and Smith, D.K. (1993). The Wisdom of ‘Teams, Harper Business, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Liou, Y. (1992). An Assessment of an Electronic Meeting Center, Journal of Information Technology Management, Vol. III, Number 2, 1–6.Google Scholar
  19. Martz, Ben. (1989). Information Systems Infrastructure for Manufacturing Planning Systems. Unpublished dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  20. Martz, Ben, and Rawlins, C. (2000). Looking for Indicators of High Performance Teams in GSS: An Exploratory Field Study. Journal of Information Technology Cases and Applications, Vol. 2, No. 4, 48–63.Google Scholar
  21. McGrath, J.E., Martin, J.R., and Kulka, R.A. (1982). Judgment Calls in Research,Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Nagasundaramm, M., and Bostrom, R.P. (1995). The Structuring of Creative Processes Using GSS. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol 11, No.3, Winter.Google Scholar
  23. Nunamaker, J.F., Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S., Vogel, D.R., and George, J.F. (1991). Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 34, July, 4258.Google Scholar
  24. Parker, Glenn (1990). Teamwork and Team Players.Google Scholar
  25. Peters, T.J., and Waterman, Jr. R.H. (1982). In Search of Excellence. Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  26. Price Waterhouse (1995). Better Change. Irwin Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Ray, M., and Myers, R. (1986). Creativity in Business. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  28. Reinig, B.A., Briggs, R.O., and Nunamaker, Jr. J.F. (1998). Flaming in the Electronic Classroom. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 14, No. 3, Winter.Google Scholar
  29. Schrage, M. (1990). Shared Minds. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Schrage, M. (1995). No More Teams! Mastering the Dynamics of Creative Collaboration. Currency Doubleday Publications, rev. 1995.Google Scholar
  31. Schwartz, P. (1991). The Art of the Long View. Doubleday, 1991.Google Scholar
  32. Senge, P.M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization. Doubleday.Google Scholar
  33. Shepherd, M.M., Briggs, R.O., Reinig, B.A., Yen, J., and Nunamaker, Jr. J.F. (1996). Social Comparison to Improve Electronic Brainstorming. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 12, No. 3, Winter.Google Scholar
  34. Siegel, S., and Castellan, Jr. J. (1988). Nonparametric Statistics,McGraw Hill, 2nd Edition.Google Scholar
  35. Warfield, J.N. (1989). Societal Systems. Intersystems Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ColoradoColorado SpringsUSA
  2. 2.California State UniversityChicoUSA

Personalised recommendations