Skip to main content

On the relevance of economic sociology for economics

  • Chapter
Economics and Sociology: Towards an Integration

Abstract

So many and so complex are the linkages between the economy and its socio-cultural environment that it is almost impossible to summarize the relevance of economic sociology for economics in the compass of a short paper. Accordingly, in what follows I am forced to be both somewhat cryptic and somewhat selective in my emphases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Paul A. Samuelson, Economics, 9th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973), p. 3. A more concise, but essentially similar definition is given by Bronfenbrenner: ‘Economics is the systematic study of social adjustment to, and management of, the scarcity of goods and resources’. Martin Bronfenbrenner, ‘A “Middlebrow” Introduction to Economic Methodology’, in Sherman Roy Krupp (ed.), The Structure of Economic Science: Essays on Methodology (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1966), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A more elaborated definition may be found in Neil J. Smelser, (ed.), Sociology: An Introduction, second edition, (New York: Wiley, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wassily Leontief, ‘Mathematics in Economics’, in Essays in Economics: Theories and Theorizing (New York: Oxford University Press, 1966), p. 23. For a recent discussion of utility functions and ‘economic man’, see Jerome Rothenberg, ‘Values and Value Theory in Economics’, in Krupp (ed.), The Structure of Economic Science, op. cit., p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Unless, in fact, the utility function is characterized in such general and indeterminate terms that every act can be characterized as rational by definition.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Talcott Parsons and Neil J. Smelser, Economy and Society (Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1956), p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karl Polanyi, Conrad Arensberg and Harry Pearson, Trade and Market in the Early Empires (Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press and the Falcon’s Wing Press, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marshall Sahlins, ‘On the Sociology of Primitive Exchange’, in Stone Age Economics (Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, 1972), p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., p. 196.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Richard Titmuss, The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1970), p. 179.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Oleg Zinam, ‘The Economics of Command Economies’, in Jan S. Prybyla (ed.), Comparative Economic Systems (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For an introductory characterization of the ‘mixed’ character of the Soviet economy, see William N. Loucks and William G. Whitney, Comparative Economic Systems, eighth edition (New York: Harper and Row, 1969), pp. 392–532.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gregory Grossman, Economic Systems, second edition (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1974), pp. 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  13. John K. Galbraith, ‘Power and the Useful Economist’, American Economic Review, Vol. 63 (1973), pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kenneth E. Boulding, ‘Urbanization and the Grants Economy: An Introduction’, in Kenneth E. Boulding, Martin Pfaff and Anita Pfaff (eds.), Transfers in an Urbanized Economy (Belmont California: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1973), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kenneth E. Boulding, ‘The Grants Economy’, in Collected Papers, edited by Fred R. Glahe (Boulder, Colorado: University of Colorado Press, 1971) p. 477.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid., p. 478.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Boulding, ‘Urbanization and the Grants Economy’, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid., Chapters 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Max Weber, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, edited by Guenter Roth and Claus Wittich (New York: Bedminster Press, 1968), Vol. I, p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Guenter Roth, ‘Max Weber’s Comparative Approach and Historical Typology’, in Ivan Vallier (ed.), Comparative Methods in Sociology (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971), pp. 92–93.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Economy and Society, op. cit., Vol. 1, pp. 212–254.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid., p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid., p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid., p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid., p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid., p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid., pp. 41–42.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid., p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid., p. 375.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ibid., p. 377.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ibid., p. 381.

    Google Scholar 

  32. A number of these theories are summarized and criticized in Pitirim A. Sorokin, Modern Historical and Social Philosophies (New York: Dover Publications, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Talcott Parsons and Neil J. Smelser, Economy and Society (Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Talcott Parsons, ‘Some Comments on the Pattern of Religious Organization in the United States’, in Parsons, Structure and Process in Modern Societies (Glencoe, Ill: The Free Press, 1960), pp. 295–321.

    Google Scholar 

  35. S. M. Lipset, The Sources of the Radical Right, in: Daniel Bell (ed.), The New American Right (New York: Criterion Books, 1955), pp. 166–233.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Peter Blau and Otis Dudley Duncan, The American Occupational Structure (New York: Wiley, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Economics, op. cit., p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  38. For a survey of these technical developments, see Armatya K. Sen, Collective Choice and Social Welfare (San Francisco: Holden-Day, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  39. L.S. Shapley and Martin Shubik, ‘Ownership and the Production Function’, in Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 81 (1967), pp. 88–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. For a survey of such analyses, see James M. Buchanan and D. Tollison (eds.), Theory of Public Choice (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Peter Marris, Family and Social Change in an African City: A Study of Rehousing in Lagos (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smelser, N.J. (1976). On the relevance of economic sociology for economics. In: Huppes, T. (eds) Economics and Sociology: Towards an Integration. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1368-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1368-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-1370-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1368-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics