Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of oral anatomy on prey selection during the ontogeny of two percoid fishes, Lagodon rhomboides and Centropomus undecimalis

  • Chapter
Ecomorphology of fishes

Part of the book series: Developments in environmental biology of fishes ((DEBF,volume 16))

  • 247 Accesses

Synopsis

Ontogenetic increases in mouth size and changes in dentition of percoid fishes may affect the size and species of prey selected, thus influencing the fundamental trophic niche. To examine the influence of oral anatomy on prey selectivity by pinfish, Lagodon rhomboides, and snook, Centropomus undecimalis, two co-occurring percoid fishes with contrasting mouth morphologies, the mouth size, dentition, stomach contents, and available prey during ontogeny were quantified. Based on the presence of prey fragments in stomach contents and direct behavioral observation, prey were categorized by the feeding mode used during capture (suction/ramfeeding or biting). Centropomus has a larger size-specific gape than Lagodon during all ontogenetic stages. Although both feeding modes were used by Lagodon during ontogeny, the amount of prey captured using suction/ram-feeding declined and the amount of prey captured by biting increased with standard length. This change in feeding mode was associated with a change in incisor shape and width: Lagodon < 39 mm SL possessed narrow, pointed incisors and strongly selected amphipods, which are captured using suction/ram-feeding; Lagodon > 40 mm SL possessed wide, flat-topped incisors and significantly increased their selectivity for polychaetes, which are captured by biting. Centropomus used ram-feeding to capture prey at all ontogenetic stages. Size-selective feeding by Centropomus was apparent but could not be due to gape-limitation alone, because average prey body depth was only 45% of gape and was not proportional to absolute mouth size increase during ontogeny. Dietary diversity was greatest during the transition from suction/ram-feeding to biting in Lagodon. Lagodon had a higher dietary diversity at all ontogenetic stages than Centropomus, due in part to Lagodon’s use of multiple feeding modes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  • Brook, I.M. 1979. A portable suction dredge for quantitative sampling in difficult substrates. Estuaries 2: 54–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, D.K. 1957. The biology and systematics of the pinfish, Lagodon rhomboides (Linnaeus). Bull. Fla. St. Mus. Biol. Sci. 2: 77–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W.E.S.&C.A. Adams. 1972. Food habits ofjuvenile marine fishes: evidence of the cleaning habit in the leatherjacket, Oligoplites saurus, and the spottail pinfish, Diplodus holbrooki. U.S. Fish. Bull, 70: 1111–1120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W.E.S.& C.A. Adams. 1973. Food habits ofjuvenile marine fishes occupying seagrass beds in the estuarine zone near Crystal River, Florida. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 102: 511–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson, J. 1978. Measuring preference in selective predation. Ecology 59: 211–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, M.S. 1977. Trophic relationships in juveniles of three species of sparid fishes in the South African marine littoral. U.S. Fish. Bull. 76: 389–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, W.H.& R.J. Livingston. 1983. Overlap and pollution-induced variability in the feeding habits of filefish (Pisces: Monacanthidae) from Apalachee Bay, Florida. Copeia 1983: 331–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, L.B. 1985. Optimal foraging and feeding mode shifts in fishes. Env. Biol. Fish. 12: 57–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggold, B.T.& P.J. Motta. 1992. Ontogenetic shifts and morphological correlates in striped mullet, Mugil cephalus. Env. Biol. Fish. 34: 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, T.H. 1968. Comparative osteology of the Atlantic snooks (Pisces, Centropomus). Copeia 1968: 433–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam, J.F.& D.F. Fraser. 1987. Habitat selection under predation hazard: test of a model with foraging minnows. Ecology 68: 1856–1862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, R.G., Jr., C.J. Donohoe& D.W. Cooke. 1983. Observations on the distribution and biology of east-central Florida populations of the common snook, Centropomus undecimalis (Bloch). Flor. Sci. 46: 313–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, M.D. 1986. Developmental transition in the feeding morphology of the midas cichlid. Copeia 1986: 1028–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.D. 1980. Ecological aspects of ontogenetic shifts in prey size utilization in the bay goby ( Pisces: Gobiidae). Oecologia 47: 233–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.D. 1986. Food resource partitioning in a rocky in- tertidal fish assemblage. J. Zool. (Lond.) 1 (B): 317–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.D., R. Coffin & P.B. Moyle. 1980. Feeding ecology of the bay goby ( Pisces: Gobiidae). Effects of behavioral, ontogenetic, and temporal variation on diet. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 44: 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambright, K.D. 1991. Experimental analysis of prey selection by largemouth bass: role of predator mouth width and prey body depth. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 120: 500–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, S.J.& R.J. Schmitt. 1988. The combined effects of predation risk and food reward on patch selection. Ecology 69: 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, M.& D.A. Wolfe. 1973. Nonparametric statistical methods. John Wiley 9999 Sons, New York. 503 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, J.A.& A. Keast. 1987. Prey handling time in two pisci vores, Esox americanus vermiculatus and Micropterus sal- moides, with contrasting mouth morphologies. Can. J. Zool. 66: 540–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keast, A. 1985. Development of dietary specializations in a summer community ofjuvenile fishes. Env. Biol. Fish. 13: 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerschner, B.A., M.S. Peterson & R.G. Gilmore, Jr. 1985. Eco-topic and ontogenetic trophic variation in mojarras ( Pisces: Gerreidae). Estuaries 8: 311–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, C.J. 1989. Ecological methodology. Harper and Row Publishers, New York. 654 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, S.R.; P.L. Shafland. 1982. Larval development of snook, Centropomus undecimalis ( Pisces: Centropomidae). Copeia 1982: 618–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauder, G.V. 1983. Prey capture hydrodynamics in fishes: experimental tests of two models. J. Exp. Biol. 104: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, J.M. 1957. Estimated size of various forage fishes largemouth bass can swallow. Proceedings of the Southeastern Association of Game and Fish Commissioners 11: 220–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehner. P.N. 1979. Handbook of ethological methods. Garland STPM Press, New York. 403 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liem, K.F. 1980. Adaptive significance of intra-and interspecific differences in the feeding repertoires of cichlid fishes. Amer. Zool. 20: 295–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liem, K.F. 1984. Functional versatility, speciation and niche overlap: are fishes different? pp. 269–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.G. Meyers & J.R. Strickler (eds) American Association for the Advancement of Science selected symposium, Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liem, K.F. 1993. Ecomorphology of the teleostean skull. pp. 422–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hanken & B.K. Hall (eds) The Skull, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liem, K.F. J.W.M. Osse. 1975. Biological versatility, evolution, and food resource exploitation in African cichlid fishes. Amer. Zool. 15: 427–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, R.J. 1982. Trophic organization of fishes in a coastal seagrass system. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 7: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luczkovich, J.J. 1987. The patterns and mechanisms of selective feeding on seagrass-meadow epifauna by juvenile pinfish, Lagodon rhomboides (Linnaeus). Ph.D. Dissertation, The Florida State University, Tallahassee. 157 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luczkovich, J.J.& E.J. Stellwag. 1993. Isolation of cellulolytic microbes from the intestinal tract of the pinfish, Lagodon rhomboides: size-related changes in diet and microbial abundance. Mar. Biol. 116: 389–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeill, D.B.& S.B. Brandt. 1990. Ontogenetic shifts in gill-raker morphology and predicted prey capture efficiency of the alewife, Alosa pseudoharengus. Copeia 1990: 164–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main, K.L. 1985. Influence of prey identity and size on selection of prey by two marine fishes. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 88: 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main, K.L. 1987. Predator avoidance in seagrass meadows: prey behavior, microhabitat selection, and cryptic coloration. Ecology 68: 170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manooch, C.S., III. 1977. Foods of the red porgy, Pagrus pagrus

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus (Pisces: Sparidae) from North Carolina and South Carolina. Bull. Mar. Sci. 27: 776–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, R.H. Jr.& K.M. Peters; G.R. Parsons. 1989. Early life history of the snook, Centropomus undecimalis, in Tampa Bay, Florida, Northeast Gulf Science 10: 113–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A. 1990. Morphometrics and allometry in the trophically polymorphic cichlid fish, Cichlasoma citrinellum: alternative adaptations and ontogenetic changes in shape. J. Zool. Lond. 221: 237–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motta, P.J., K.B. Clifton, P. Hernandez & B.T. Eggold. 1995. Eco-morphological correlates in ten species of subtropical seagrass fishes: diet and microhabitat utilization. Env. Biol. Fish. 44: 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, S.F. 1991. Capture success and diet of cottid fishes: the role of predator morphology and attack kinematics. Ecology 72: 1807–1819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimchen, T.E. 1991a. Trout foraging failures and the evolution of body size in stickleback. Copeia 1991: 1098–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimchen, T.E. 1991b. Evolutionary attributes of headfirst prey manipulation and swallowing in piscivores. Can. J. Zool. 69: 2912–2916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schael, D.M., L.G. Rudstam & J.R. Post. 1991. Gape limitation and prey selection in larval yellow perch (Perca flavescens), freshwater drum (Aplodinotus grunniens) and black crappie (Pomoxis nigromaculatus). Can. J. Fish. Aquatic. Sci. 48: 19191925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, R.J. & S.J. Holbrook. 1984a. Ontogeny of prey selection by black surfperch Embiotoca jacksoni (Pisces: Embiotocidae): the roles of fish morphology, foraging behavior, and patch selection. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 18: 225–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, R.J.& S.J. Holbrook. 1984b. Gape-limitation, foraging tactics and prey size selectivity of two microcarnivorous species of fish. Oecologia 63: 6 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sogard, S. 1984. Utilization of meiofauna as a food source by a grassbed fish, the spotted dragonet Callionymus pauciradiatus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 17: 183–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoner, A.W. 1980. Feeding ecology of Lagodon rhomboides (Pisces: Sparidae): variation and functional responses. U.S. Fish. Bull. 78: 337–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoner, A.W. & R.J. Livingston. 1984. Ontogenetic patterns in diet and feeding morphology in sympatric sparid fishes from seagrass meadows. Copeia 1984: 174–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, F.A. 1978. Food habits of the sea bream, Archosargus rhomboidalis (Linnaeus), and comparative growth on plant and animal food. Bull. Mar. Sci. 28: 527–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright, P.C. 1988. Morphology and ecology: functional basis of feeding constraints in Caribbean labrid fishes. Ecology 69: 635–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright, P.C. 1991. Ecomorphology: experimental functional anatomy for ecological problems. Amer. Zool. 31: 680–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright, P.C.& B.A. Richard. 1995. Predicting patterns of prey use from morphology of fishes. Env. Biol. Fish. 44: 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, P.W. 1986. Effect of body form and response threshold on the vulnerability of four species of teleost prey attacked by largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43: 763–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E. 1974. The fish size, prey size, handling time relation in several sunfishes and some implications. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 31: 1531 1536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E.& J.F. Gilliam. 1984. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 393–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E., J.F. Gilliam, D.J. Hall & G.G. Mittelbach. 1983. An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64: 1540–1548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L. 1990. SYSTAT: The system for statistics. SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston. 677 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaret, T.M. 1980. Predation and freshwater fish communities. Yale University Press, New Haven. 187 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA

    Joseph J. Luczkovich

  2. Institute for Coastal and Marine Resources, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA

    Joseph J. Luczkovich & Stephen F. Norton

  3. Division of Environmental, Coastal and Ocean Studies, Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution, Ft. Pierce, FL, 34946, USA

    R. Grant Gilmore Jr.

Authors
  1. Joseph J. Luczkovich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephen F. Norton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Grant Gilmore Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Joseph J. Luczkovich Philip J. Motta Stephen F. Norton Karel F. Liem

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Luczkovich, J.J., Norton, S.F., Gilmore, R.G. (1995). The influence of oral anatomy on prey selection during the ontogeny of two percoid fishes, Lagodon rhomboides and Centropomus undecimalis . In: Luczkovich, J.J., Motta, P.J., Norton, S.F., Liem, K.F. (eds) Ecomorphology of fishes. Developments in environmental biology of fishes, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1356-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1356-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4620-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1356-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation