Advertisement

Large-Time Spatial Covariance of Concentration of Conservative Solute and Application to the Cape Cod Tracer Test

Chapter
  • 116 Downloads

Abstract

Most studies on conservative transport in stationary velocity fields have focused on the description of the concentration mean. In this work, we use a Lagrangian methodology to develop an analytical expression for the spatial covariance of the concentration, based on the central limit theorem and applicable to large times after injection. We use this expression to analyze the conservative tracer test data from the natural gradient experiment conducted at Cape Cod in 1985–1988, in which bromide was quickly injected into the aquifer and the concentration was measured at many locations at certain points in time. The parameters that determine the concentration mean had been estimated in previous studies. Here, the two-particle covariance matrix, needed to describe the concentration covariance function, is derived from the measurements through a maximum likelihood method. Then, the data are interpolated on a grid using simple kriging, and contour maps of the concentration estimates are plotted. The results of cross-validation indicate that the model is consistent with the field measurements and the kriging estimates appear realistic.

Key words

concentration covariance model two-particle moments maximum likelihood estimation field measurements kriging interpolation. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Batchelor, K.: 1952, Diffusion in a field of homogeneous turbulence, 2. The relative motion of particles, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 48, 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bear, J.: 1972, Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media, Elsevier, New York, pp. 764.Google Scholar
  3. Bellin, A., Salandin, P. and Rinaldo, A.: 1992, Simulation of dispersion in heterogeneous formations: Statistics, first-order theories, convergence of computations, Water Resour. Res. 28 (9), 2211–2227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. A.: 1970, Probability, Statistics, and Decision for Civil Engineers, MacGraw-Hill, NY, pp. 684.Google Scholar
  5. Berkowitz, B. and Scher, H.: 1998, Theory of anomalous chemical transport in random fracture networks, Physical Rev. E 57 (5), 5858–5869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhattacharya, R.: 1985, A central limit theorem for diffusions with periodic coefficients, The Annals of Probab. 13 (2), 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhattacharya, R. N., Gupta, V. K. and Walkers, H. F.: 1989, Asymptotics of solute dispersion in periodic porous media, Siam J. Appl. Math. 49 (1), 86–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dagan, G.: 1982, Stochastic modeling of groundwater flow by unconditional and conditional probabilities, 2. The solute transport, Water Resour. Res. 18 (4), 835–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dagan, G.: 1984, Solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations, J. Fluid Mech. 145, 151–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dagan, G.: 1989, Flow and Transport in Porous Formations, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dagan, G. and Fiori, A.: 1997, The influence of pore-scale dispersion on concentration statistical moments in transport through heterogeneous aquifers, Water Resour. Res. 33 (7), 1595–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fiori, A. and Dagan, G.: 1999, Concentration fluctuations in transport by groundwater: Comparison between theory and field experiments, Water Resour. Res. 35 (1), 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisher, H. B., List, E. J., Koh, R. C. Y., Imberger, J. and Brooks, N. H.: 1979, Mixing in Inland and Coastal Waters, Academic Press, NY, pp. 483.Google Scholar
  14. Garabedian, S. P., LeBlanc, D. R., Gelhar, L. W. and Celia, M. A.: 1991, Large-scale natural gradient test in sand and gravel, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, 2: Analysis of spatial moments for nonreactive tracer, Water Resour. Res. 27 (5), 911–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gelhar, L. W. and Axness, C. L.: 1983, Three-dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers, Water Resour. Res. 19 (1), 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Graham, W. D. and McLaughlin, D.: 1989, Stochastic analysis of nonstationary subsurface solute transport: 1. Unconditional moments, Water Resour. Res. 25 (2), 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kabala, Z. J.: 1997, Analytical solutions for the coefficient of variation of the volume-averaged solute concentration in heterogeneous aquifers, Stoch. Hydrol. Hydraul. 11 (4), 331–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kapoor, V. and Gelhar, L. W.: 1994a, Transport in three-dimensionally heterogeneous aquifers: 1.Google Scholar
  19. Dynamics of concentration fluctuations, Water Resour. Res. 30(6), 1775–1788.Google Scholar
  20. Kapoor, V. and Gelhar, L. W.: 1994b, Transport in three-dimensionally heterogeneous aquifers: 2.Google Scholar
  21. Predictions and observations of concentration fluctuations, Water Resour. Res. 30(6), 1789–1801.Google Scholar
  22. Kapoor, V. and Kitanidis, P. K.: 1996, Concentration fluctuations and dilution in two-dimensionally periodic heterogeneous porous media, Transport in Porous Media 21 (1), 91–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kapoor, V. and Kitanidis, P. K.: 1997, Advection—diffusion in spatially random flows: formulation for the concentration covariance, Stoch. Hydrol. Hydraul. 11 (5), 397–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kapoor, V. and Kitanidis, P. K.: 1998, Concentration fluctuations and dilution in aquifer, Water Resour. Res. 34 (5), 1181–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kitanidis, P. K. and Lane, R. W.: 1985, Maximum likelihood parameter estimation of hydrologic spatial processes by Gauss—Newton method, J. Hydrol. 79, 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kitanidis, P. K.: 1991, Orthonormal residuals in geostatistics: model criticism and parameter estimation, Math. Geol. 23 (5), 741–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kitanidis, R. K.: 1994, The concept of the dilution index, Water Resour. Res. 30 (7), 2011–2026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kitanidis, P. K.: 1997, Introduction to Geostatistics,Cambridge University Press, pp. 249.Google Scholar
  29. LeBlanc, D. R., Garabedian, S. R, Hess, K. M., Gelhar, L. W., Quadri, R. D., Stollenwerk, K. G. and Wood, W. W.: 1991, Large-scale natural gradient test in sand and gravel, Cape CodGoogle Scholar
  30. Massachusetts, 1: Experimental design and observed movement, Water Resour. Res. 27(5), 895–910.Google Scholar
  31. Neuman, S. P., Winter, C. L. and Newman, C. M.: 1987, Stochastic theory of field-scale Fickian dispersion in anisotropic porous media, Water Resour. Res. 23 (3), 453–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neuman, S. P. and Zhang, Y. K.: 1990, A quasi-linear theory of non-Fickian and Fickian subsurface dispersion, 1. Theoretical analysis with application to isotropic media, Water Resour. Res. 26 (5), 887–902.Google Scholar
  33. Neuman, S. P.: 1993, Eulerian—Lagrangian theory of transport in space-time nonstationary velocity fields: Exact nonlocal formalism by conditional moments and weak approximations, Water Resour. Res. 29 (3), 633–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pannone, M. and Kitanidis, P. K.: 1999, Large time behavior of concentration variance and dilution in heterogeneous formations, Water Resour. Res. 35 (3), 623–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parzen, E.: 1960, Modern Probability Theory and Its Applications, Wiley, NY, pp. 464.Google Scholar
  36. Richardson, L. F.: 1926, Atmospheric diffusion shown on a distance-neighbour graph, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 110, 709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rajaram, H. and Gelhar, L. W.: 1993, Plume scale-dependent dispersion in heterogeneous aquifers 2., Eulerian analysis and three-dimensional aquifers, Water Resour. Res. 29 (9), 3249–3260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rubin, Y.: 1990, Stochastic modeling of macrodispersion in heterogeneous porous media, Water Resour. Res. 26 (1), 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rubin, Y.: 1991, Transport in heterogeneous porous media: prediction and uncertainty, Water Resour. Res. 27 (7), 1723–1738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thierrin, J. and Kitanidis, P. K.: 1994, Solute dilution at the Borden and Cape Cod groundwater tracer tests, Water Resour. Res. 30 (11), 2883–2890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vomvoris, E. G. and Gelhar, L. W.: 1990, Stochastic analysis of the concentration variability in a three-dimensional heterogeneous aquifer, Water Resour. Res. 26 (10), 2591–2602.Google Scholar
  42. Zhang, Y. K. and Neuman, S. P.: 1990, A quasi-linear theory of non-Fickian and Fickian subsurface dispersion, 2. Application to anisotropic media at the Borden site, Water Resour. Res. 26 (5), 903–913.Google Scholar
  43. Zhang, Q.: 1995, Transient behavior of mixing induced by a random velocity field, Water Resour. Res. 31 (3), 577–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang, D.: 1995, Impacts of dispersion and first-order decay on solute transport in randomly heterogeneous porous media, Transport in Porous Media 21, 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations