Abstract
On the basis of the ‘balance’ model developed by Bakker, two types of reading disability can be distinguished. One type (P-type) reads slowly and makes relatively many so-called time-consuming errors such as spelling, fragmentations and repetitions. The other type (L-type) reads hastily and reading errors are characterized by skipping or adding words or parts of words. In the present chapter, L- and P-type children are compared on a number of component tasks that tap different stages of information processing in word recognition. The results suggest that the poorer reading performance of L-type children is associated with problems in the visual analysis of letter arrays/graphemes, whereas the poorer performance of P-type children, may be largely attributed to problems on a lexical level (accessing and/or searching the lexicon).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bakker, D. J.: 1981, ‘A set of brains for learning to read’, in K. C. Diller (ed.), Cognitive Growth and Development, Brunner/Mazel, New York, pp. 56–71.
Bakker, D. J.: 1983, ‘Hemispheric specialization and specific reading retardation’, in M. Rutter (ed.), Developmental Neuropsychiatry, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 498–506.
Bakker, D. J., Licht, R. and Van Strien, J.: 1991, ‘Biopsychological validation of L- and P-type dyslexia’, in B. P. Rourke (ed.), Neuropsychological Validation of Learning Disability Subtypes, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 124–138.
Bakker, D. J. and Vinke, J.: 1985, ‘Effects of hemisphere-specific stimulation on brain activity and reading in dyslexics’, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 7, 505–525.
Barron, R. W.: 1986, ‘Word recognition in early reading: A review of the direct and indirect access hypotheses’, Cognition 24, 93–119.
Boder, E.: 1973, ‘Developmental dyslexia: A diagnostic approach based on three atypical
reading patterns’, Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 15, 663–687.
Brus, B. and Voeten, M. J.: 1973, Een-minuut-test, vorm A en B, verantwoording enhandleiding,[One-minute-test, form A and B, background and manual], Berkhout,Nijmegen.
Frederiksen, J. R.: 1977, ‘Assessment of perceptual, decoding, and lexical skills and their relation to reading proficiency’, in A. M. Lesgold, S. D. Fokkema and R. Glaser (eds.), Cognitive Psychology and Instruction, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 153–169.
Frederiksen, J. R.: 1980, ‘Component skills in reading: Measurement of individual differences through chronometric analysis’, in R. E. Snow, P.-A. Federico and W. E. Montague (eds.), Aptitude, Learning and Instruction, Vol. I, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 105–138.
Frith, U.: 1985, ‘Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia’, in K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall and M. Coltheart (eds.), Surface Dyslexia in Adults and Children, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, pp. 301–329.
Laerge, D. and Samuels, S. J.: 1974, ‘Towards a theory of automatic information processing in reading’, Cognitive Psychology 6, 293–323.
Licht, R.: 1988, Event-Related Potential Asymmetries and Word Reading in Children: A Developmental Study, Doctoral dissertation, Free University, Amsterdam.
Licht, R., Bakker, D. J., Kok, A. and Bouma, A.: 1988, ‘The development of lateral event-related potentials (ERPs) related to word naming: A four year longitudinal study’, Neuropsychologia 26, 327–340.
Licht, R.: 1989, ‘Reading disability subtypes: Cognitive and electrophysiological differences’, in D. J. Bakker and H. van der Vlugt (eds.), Learning Disabilities, Vol. I: Neuropsychological Correlates and Treatment,S wets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, the Netherlands, pp. 81–103.
Neijens, L.: 1991, Betrouwbaarheid en Validiteit van Classificatie in Type Dyslexie vol-gens het Balans Model [Reliability and Validity of Dyslexia Subtype Classification According to the Balance Model], Master thesis, Free University, Amsterdam.
Seymour, P. H. K. and MacGregor, C. J.: 1984, ‘Developmental dyslexia: A cognitive experimental analysis of phonological, morphemic, and visual impairments’, Cognitive Neuropsychology 1, 43–82.
Stanovich, K. E.: 1986, ‘Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy’, Reading Research Quarterly 21, 360–407.
Van Aarle, E. J. M. and Vollebergh, M.: 1986, ‘Raders en spellers: Wat is de betekenis van dit onderscheid in de groep zwakke lezers?’ [Guessers and spellers: What is the meaning of this distinction in the group of poor readers?], Pedagogische Studien 63, 339–346.
Van den Berg, R. M. and te Lintelo, H. G.: 1977, AVI: Analyse van Individualiseringsvormen, Individualisering van het Leesonderwijs [AVI: Analysis of Individual Reading Styles], Katholiek Pedagogisch Centrum, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
Van der Leij, A.: 1983, Ernstige Leerproblem [Severe Learning Problems], Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, the Netherlands.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Licht, R., van Onna, J. (1995). Differences in Components of Word Recognition between P- and L-Type Reading Disability. In: Leong, C.K., Joshi, R.M. (eds) Developmental and Acquired Dyslexia. Neuropsychology and Cognition, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1241-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1241-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4473-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1241-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive