Skip to main content

Differences in Components of Word Recognition between P- and L-Type Reading Disability

  • Chapter
Developmental and Acquired Dyslexia

Part of the book series: Neuropsychology and Cognition ((NPCO,volume 9))

Abstract

On the basis of the ‘balance’ model developed by Bakker, two types of reading disability can be distinguished. One type (P-type) reads slowly and makes relatively many so-called time-consuming errors such as spelling, fragmentations and repetitions. The other type (L-type) reads hastily and reading errors are characterized by skipping or adding words or parts of words. In the present chapter, L- and P-type children are compared on a number of component tasks that tap different stages of information processing in word recognition. The results suggest that the poorer reading performance of L-type children is associated with problems in the visual analysis of letter arrays/graphemes, whereas the poorer performance of P-type children, may be largely attributed to problems on a lexical level (accessing and/or searching the lexicon).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bakker, D. J.: 1981, ‘A set of brains for learning to read’, in K. C. Diller (ed.), Cognitive Growth and Development, Brunner/Mazel, New York, pp. 56–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, D. J.: 1983, ‘Hemispheric specialization and specific reading retardation’, in M. Rutter (ed.), Developmental Neuropsychiatry, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 498–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, D. J., Licht, R. and Van Strien, J.: 1991, ‘Biopsychological validation of L- and P-type dyslexia’, in B. P. Rourke (ed.), Neuropsychological Validation of Learning Disability Subtypes, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 124–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, D. J. and Vinke, J.: 1985, ‘Effects of hemisphere-specific stimulation on brain activity and reading in dyslexics’, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 7, 505–525.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, R. W.: 1986, ‘Word recognition in early reading: A review of the direct and indirect access hypotheses’, Cognition 24, 93–119.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boder, E.: 1973, ‘Developmental dyslexia: A diagnostic approach based on three atypical

    Google Scholar 

  • reading patterns’, Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 15, 663–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brus, B. and Voeten, M. J.: 1973, Een-minuut-test, vorm A en B, verantwoording enhandleiding,[One-minute-test, form A and B, background and manual], Berkhout,Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J. R.: 1977, ‘Assessment of perceptual, decoding, and lexical skills and their relation to reading proficiency’, in A. M. Lesgold, S. D. Fokkema and R. Glaser (eds.), Cognitive Psychology and Instruction, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J. R.: 1980, ‘Component skills in reading: Measurement of individual differences through chronometric analysis’, in R. E. Snow, P.-A. Federico and W. E. Montague (eds.), Aptitude, Learning and Instruction, Vol. I, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 105–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U.: 1985, ‘Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia’, in K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall and M. Coltheart (eds.), Surface Dyslexia in Adults and Children, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, pp. 301–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laerge, D. and Samuels, S. J.: 1974, ‘Towards a theory of automatic information processing in reading’, Cognitive Psychology 6, 293–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Licht, R.: 1988, Event-Related Potential Asymmetries and Word Reading in Children: A Developmental Study, Doctoral dissertation, Free University, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht, R., Bakker, D. J., Kok, A. and Bouma, A.: 1988, ‘The development of lateral event-related potentials (ERPs) related to word naming: A four year longitudinal study’, Neuropsychologia 26, 327–340.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Licht, R.: 1989, ‘Reading disability subtypes: Cognitive and electrophysiological differences’, in D. J. Bakker and H. van der Vlugt (eds.), Learning Disabilities, Vol. I: Neuropsychological Correlates and Treatment,S wets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, the Netherlands, pp. 81–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neijens, L.: 1991, Betrouwbaarheid en Validiteit van Classificatie in Type Dyslexie vol-gens het Balans Model [Reliability and Validity of Dyslexia Subtype Classification According to the Balance Model], Master thesis, Free University, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P. H. K. and MacGregor, C. J.: 1984, ‘Developmental dyslexia: A cognitive experimental analysis of phonological, morphemic, and visual impairments’, Cognitive Neuropsychology 1, 43–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E.: 1986, ‘Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy’, Reading Research Quarterly 21, 360–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Aarle, E. J. M. and Vollebergh, M.: 1986, ‘Raders en spellers: Wat is de betekenis van dit onderscheid in de groep zwakke lezers?’ [Guessers and spellers: What is the meaning of this distinction in the group of poor readers?], Pedagogische Studien 63, 339–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg, R. M. and te Lintelo, H. G.: 1977, AVI: Analyse van Individualiseringsvormen, Individualisering van het Leesonderwijs [AVI: Analysis of Individual Reading Styles], Katholiek Pedagogisch Centrum, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Leij, A.: 1983, Ernstige Leerproblem [Severe Learning Problems], Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Licht, R., van Onna, J. (1995). Differences in Components of Word Recognition between P- and L-Type Reading Disability. In: Leong, C.K., Joshi, R.M. (eds) Developmental and Acquired Dyslexia. Neuropsychology and Cognition, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1241-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1241-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4473-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1241-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics