Advertisement

The Computer as a Catalyst in the Mathematics Classroom?

Chapter
Part of the Mathematics Education Library book series (MELI, volume 14)

Abstract

Although teachers are usually present, their interventions are more similar to those of the expert dancers in the samba school than those of a traditional teacher armed with lesson plans and a set curriculum. The LOGO teacher will answer questions, provide help if asked, and sometimes sit down next to a student and say: “Let me show you something.” What is shown is not dictated by a set syllabus. Sometimes it is something the student can use for an immediate project. Sometimes it is something that the teacher has recently learned and thinks the student would enjoy. Sometimes the teacher is simply acting spontaneously as people do in all unstructured social situations when they are excited about what they are doing. The LOGO environment is like the samba school also in the fact that the flow of ideas and even of instructions is not a one-way street. The environment is designed to foster richer and deeper interactions than are commonly seen in schools today in connection with anything mathematical. (Papert 1980, p. 179)

Keywords

Mathematics Teacher Mathematics Classroom National Curriculum Mathematics Curriculum Mathematical Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fey, J.T.: 1989, Technology and Mathematics Education: a Survey of Recent Developments and Important Problems, Educational Studies in Mathematics 20, 237–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Goldstein, R.: 1990, Adventure games don’t rule, OK?, Micromath 6 (2), 23.Google Scholar
  3. Hawkridge, D.: 1983, New Information Technology in Education, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  4. Hillel, J., Kieran, C. and Gurtner, J-L.: 1989, Solving Structured Geometric Tasks: The Role of Feedback in Generating Strategies, Educational Studies in Mathematics 20 (1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hoyles, C. and Noss, R.: 1987, Synthesizing mathematical conceptions and their formalisation through the construction of a Logo-based school mathematics curriculum, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 18 (4), 581–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hoyles, C. and Sutherland, R.: 1989, Logo Mathematics in the Classroom, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Lemerise, T.: 1990, Integrating Logo in the regular mathematics curriculum. A developmental risk or opportunity, Proceedings of Fourteenth Meeting of International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Oaxtepec, Mexico Google Scholar
  8. Mehan, H.: 1989, Microcomputers in Classrooms: Educational Technology or Social Practice, Anthropology and Education Quarterly 20, 4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Morgan, C.: 1990, Carry on SMILEing, Micromath 6 (3), 14–15.Google Scholar
  10. Morgan, C.: 1991, In-service Education, Computers and Action Research, Paper presented at the Working Group on ‘Teachers as Researchers’ at PME 15Google Scholar
  11. National Curriculum Council: 1989, Mathematics in the National Curriculum: Non-Statutory Guidance, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  12. Noss, R.: 1988, The Computer as a Cultural Influence in Mathematical Learning, Educational Studies in Mathematics 19, 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Olson, J.: 1980, Teacher constructs and curriculum change, Journal of Curriculum Studies 12 (1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Olson, J.: 1988, Schoolworlds/ Microworlds: Computers and the Culture of the Classroom, Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Papert, S.: 1980, Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas, Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  16. Taylor, R.: 1980, The Computer in the School: Tutor, Tool, Tutee, New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  17. Watson, D. M.: 1990, The Classroom vs the Computer Room, Computers Education 15 (1–3), 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weir, S.: 1987 Cultivating Minds: A Logo Casebook, London: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  19. Wright, A.: 1987, The Process of Microtechnological Innovation in Two Primary Schools: a case study of teachers’ thinking, Educational Review 39 (2), 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics, Statistics and ComputingInstitute of EducationLondonUK

Personalised recommendations