Advertisement

Whose Culture Includes Mathematics?

Chapter
Part of the Mathematics Education Library book series (MELI, volume 14)

Abstract

In this chapter I argue that the ample evidence that mathematics is a discipline predominantly attractive to white, male, middle class students can, in part, be explained by the siting, in a socio-cultural context, of its content and the most commonly experienced teaching style. I identify the mathematics encountered through formal education as resonant of a powerful male, eurocentric culture which reifies its own perception of objectivity and reason, in an atmosphere promoting individualism and competition. To address participation rates in mathematics, I claim that we can no longer shelter behind a pretence that the subject is universal, objective and unrelated to the social conditions within which it is developed and practised. Furthermore, the images of the subject itself cannot be separated from the pedagogic style through which it is learnt.

Keywords

Mathematical Knowledge School Mathematics Pedagogic Style Asian American Student Eternal Truth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Apple, M.: 1979, Ideology and Curriculum, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bishop, A.J.: 1988, ‘Mathematics Education in its Cultural Context’ in Bishop, A.J. (Ed) Mathematics Education and Culture, Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishop, A.J.: 1991, Mathematical Enculturation, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  4. Borasi, R.: 1987, ‘Exploring Mathematics Through the Analysis of Errors’, For the Learning of Mathematics, Vol. 7, No.3 (November), pps 2–8.Google Scholar
  5. Bowles, S. and Gintis, H.: 1976, Schooling in capitalist America, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Buerk, D.: 1985, ‘The Voices of Women Making Meaning in Mathematics’, Journal of Education, Vol. 167, No.3, pps 59–70.Google Scholar
  7. Burton, L.: 1986, Girls into Maths Can Go, London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  8. Burton, L.: 1994, Who Counts? Assessing Mathematics in Europe, Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham BooksGoogle Scholar
  9. Buxton, L.: 1981, Do you Panic about Mathematics?, London: HeinemannGoogle Scholar
  10. Chipman, S. F. and Wilson, D. M.: 1985, ‘Understanding Mathematics Course Enrolment and Mathematics Achievement: A Synthesis of the Research’, in Chipman, S. F., Brush, L. R. and Wilson, D. M. (Eds.) Women and Mathematics: Balancing the Equation, Hillsdale, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.Google Scholar
  11. Cockcroft, W. H. (Chair): 1982, Mathematics Counts, Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of Mathematics in Schools. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  12. Countryman, J.: 1992, Writing to Learn Mathematics, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, P. J. and Hersh, R.: 1983, The Mathematical Experience, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  14. Davis, R.B., Maher, C.A. and Noddings, N. (Eds.): 1990, ‘Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph No. 4, Reston, Va.: N.C.T.M.Google Scholar
  15. Gerdes, P.: 1985, ‘Conditions and strategies for emancipatory mathematics education’, For the Learning of Mathematics, 5, 1.Google Scholar
  16. Glennon, L. M.: 1979, Women and Dualism, London: Longman.Google Scholar
  17. Harding, S.: 1986, The Science Question in Feminism, Milton Keynes: O.U. Press.Google Scholar
  18. Isaacson, Z.: 1990, ‘They look at you in absolute horror: Women writing and talking about Mathematics’, in Burton, L. (Ed.), Gender and Mathematics: An International Perspective, London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  19. Joseph, G. G.: 1987, ‘Foundations of Eurocentrism in Mathematics’ Race and Class 28, 3, pp. 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kahle, J. B.: 1986, ‘From One Minority to Another’ in Harding J. (Ed.) Perspectives on Gender and Science, Lewes: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kline, M.: 1972, Mathematics and Western Culture, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  22. Lakatos, I.: 1976, Proofs and Refutations, Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mason, J., Burton, L. and Stacey, K: 1982, Thinking Mathematically Wokingham:Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  24. MacCormack, C. and Strathern, M.: 1980, Nature, Culture and Gender, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. On, E. W.: 1987, Twice as Less, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  26. Quilter D. and Harper E.: 1988, ‘Why we didn’t like mathematics, and why we can’t do it’, Educational Research Vol. 30, No. 2, June, pps. 121–134.Google Scholar
  27. Reyes, L. and Stanic, G.: 1988, ‘Race, Sex, Socioeconomic Status and Mathematics’ Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 26–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schoenfeld, A.: 1989, ‘Peer Interaction, Problem-Solving and Cognition’, International Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scott-Hodgetts, R.: 1986, ‘Girls and Mathematics: The Negative Implications of Success’ in Burton, L. (Ed.) Girls Into Maths Can Go, London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  30. Stephens, M. and Izard, J. (Eds.): 1992, Reshaping Assessment Practices: Assessment in the Mathematical Sciences under Challenge, Hawthorn, Vic.: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  31. Thom, R.: 1973, ‘Modern Mathematics: Does it Exist?’ in Howson, G. (Ed.) Development in Mathematics Education, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Weinreich-Haste, H.: 1986, ‘Brother Sun, Sister Moon: Does Rationality Overcome a Dualistic World View?’ in Harding, J. (Ed.) Perspectives on Gender and Science, Lewes: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  33. Willis, P. E.: 1977, Learning to Labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Farnborough: Saxon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of BirminghamEdgbaston, BirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations