Abstract
Recent opinions of those interested in mathematics education have suggested that variations in the classroom culture and the nature of the patterns of interaction that occur between the teacher and the students create quite different settings for enhancing learning. Even earlier studies had pointed to the discrepancies between the intentions of teachers, their actual practice, and the latent learning of students (Bauersfeld, 1980; Holt, 1982; & Willis, 1977). In many ways, teachers have often unwittingly undermined their own goals by failing to realize that the consequences of their interaction are often quite different from their intentions. Descriptions of various mathematics classes commonly reveal them to be settings in which teachers still view their role as being responsible for only ensuring students’ learn specified procedures for solving mathematical problems (Goodlad, 1983; Stodolsky, 1988). From this philosophy a long tradition of rule-bound school mathematics has continued. It has restrained the motivation for inventiveness for any student who enjoys both independent reasoning and collaboration of ideas. Children who engage in mathematical activity in interactive situations do learn mathematics in a manner that extends beyond the realms of memorized procedures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ainley, J.: 1988, Perceptions of teachers’ questioning styles In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Veszprem, Hungary, 92–99.
Bauersfeld, H., Krummheuer, and G., Voigt, J.: 1988, Interactional theory of learning and teaching mathematics and related microethnical studies In H. G. Steiner and A.
Vermandel (Eds.), Foundations and methodology of the discipline of mathematics education,Antwerp: Proceedings of the THE Conference, 174–188.
Bauersfeld, H.: 1990, Personal Communique.
Bauersfeld, H.: 1988, Interaction, construction, and knowledge: Alternative perspectives for mathematics education In T. Cooney & D. A. Grouws (Eds.), Effective Mathematics Teaching, Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and Erlbaum Associates, 27–46.
Bauersfeld, H.: 1980, ‘Hidden dimensions in the so-called reality of a mathematics classroom,’ Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11, 23–41.
Christie, F.: 1989, Language education Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cobb, P., and Merkel G.: 1989, Thinking strategies as an example of teaching arithmetic through problem solving, In P. Trafton (Ed.), 1989 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 70–81.
Cobb, P., Wood, T. & Yackel, E.: 1991, A constructivist approach to second grade mathematics,’ in E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 157–176 ). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., and Yackel, E.: 1993, Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice, in N. Minick, E. Forman, and A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for Learning: Social Cultural Dynamics in Children’s Development, Oxford University Press, 91–119.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., and McNeal, B.: 1992, Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis, American Educational Research Journal, 29 (3), 573–604.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., Nicholls, J., Wheatley, G., Trigatti, B., and Perlwitz, M.: 1991, Assessment of a problem-centered second-grade mathematics project, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 22, 3–29.
Cobb, P., Yackel, E., and Wood, T.: 1989, Young children’s emotional acts while doing mathematical problem solving, In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving: A New Perspective, New York: Springer-Verlag, 117–148.
Edwards, D., and Mercer, N.: 1987, Common Knowledge London: Methuen.
Erickson, F.: 1982, Taught cognitive learning in its immediate environments: A neglected topic in the anthropology of education, Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 13 (2), 149–180.
Goodlad, J. I.: 1983, A Place Called School, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hoetker, J., and Ahlbrandt, W.: 1969, ‘The persistence of recitation,’ American Educational Research Journal, 6, 145–167.
Holt, J.: 1982, How Children Fail New York: Dell Publishing.
Kamii, C.: 1985, Young Children Reinvent Arithmetic: Implications of Piaget’s Theory, Columbia, NY: Teacher College Press.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E.: 1991, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation New York: Cambridge, University Press.
Mehan, H.: 1979, Learning lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mercer, N.: 1992, Culture, context, and the construction of knowledge in the classroom, In P. Light and G. Butterworth (Eds.), Context and Cognition, ( 28–46 ) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McNeal, B.: 1992, Mathematical Learning in a Textbook-based Classroom Paper presented at the International Congress of Mathematics Educators, University of Laval, Quebec, Canada
Palincsar, A. and Brown, A.: 1984, Reciprocal teaching of comprehension–fostering and comprehension–monitoring activities, Cognition and Instruction 1 (2) 117–175.
Pimm, D.: 1990, Teaching as meta-communication,’ In G. Booker, P. Cobb, and T. de Mendicuti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education,Oaxtepec, Mexico.
Rathmell, E. C.: 1978, Using thinking strategies to teach the basic facts, In M. Suydam & R. Reys (Eds.), Developing Computational Skills (pp. 13–38 ), Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Rogoff, B.: 1990, Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context, New York: Oxford University Press.
Sinclair, J., and Coulthard, R.: 1975, Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English used by Teachers and Pupils London: Oxford University Press.
Steffe, L. P., von Glasersfeld, E., Richards, J., and Cobb, P.: 1983, Children’s counting types: Philosophy, theory, and application, New York: Praeger Scientific.
Stodolsky, S.: 1988, The Subject Matters: Classroom Activity in Math and Social Studies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stubbs, M.: 1974, Organizing Classroom Talk, Occasional paper 19, Center for Research in the Educational Sciences, University of Edinburgh.
Thornton, C.: 1978, Emphasizing thinking strategies in basic fact instruction, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 9, 214–227.
Treffers, A.: 1991, Meeting innumeracy at primary school, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 333–352.
Voigt, J.: 1985, Patterns and routines in classroom interaction, Recherches en Didactique des Mathematiques, 6, 69–118.
Voigt, J.: 1989, Social functions of routines and consequences for subject matter learning, International Journal of Educational Research,13 (6), 647–656.
Voigt, J.: 1990 The microethnographical investigation of the interactive constitution of mathematical meaning InProceedings of the 2nd Bratislava International Symposium on Mathematics Education, 19 pp. 120–143.
Wertsch, J., Minick, N., and Arns, F.: 1984, The creation of context in joint problem-solving, In B. Rognoff, and J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 151–171.
Willis, P.: 1977, Learning to Labor: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs, Aldershot, Hampshire: Saxon House.
Wood, T.: 1991, Learning in an inquiry mathematics classroom, in F. Furinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 3, pp. 356–363 ) Assisi, Italy.
Wood, T., and Sellers, P.: in review, ‘Assessment of a problem-centered mathematics program: Third grade,’ Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.
Wood, T., and Yackel, E.: 1990, The development of collaborative dialogue in small group interactions, in L. P. Steffe and T. Wood (Eds.), Transforming Children’s Mathematics Education: International Perspectives, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 244–252.
Wood, T., Cobb, P. and Yackel, E.: 1991, Change in learning mathematics: Change in teaching mathematics, in H. Marshall (Ed.), Supporting Student Learning: Roots of Educational Restructuring, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 177–205.
Yackel, E., Cobb, P., and Wood, T.: 1991, Small group interactions as a source of learning opportunities in second grade mathematics, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 22 (5), 390–408.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wood, T. (1994). Patterns of Interaction and the Culture of Mathematics Classrooms. In: Lerman, S. (eds) Cultural Perspectives on the Mathematics Classroom. Mathematics Education Library, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1199-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1199-9_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4424-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1199-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive