Abstract
“It is particularly interesting to point to progress in science towards new, better theories, entirely guided by factors internal to the old theory.” In his provocative 1971 essay on the ‘rationale’ of scientific discovery (Post 1971), Heinz Post gave this as one of the reasons for embarking on such a study. In the case of the emergence of special relativity, one of the four scientific revolutions Post discussed in defending his rationale of ‘conservative induction’, the observation is particularly apt. In the present paper, I want first to elaborate on this theme. Einstein’s 1905 postulates have larger “footprints” — to borrow Post’s term — in the “old theory” (if by this is meant the assortment of Maxwell-Lorentz ether electrodynamics, classical mechanics and thermodynamics) than is perhaps still widely appreciated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Anandan, J. (1980), ‘On the Hypotheses Underlying Physical Geometry’, Foundations of Physics, 10, pp. 601–629.
Anandan, J. (1991), ‘A Geometric Approach to Quantum Mechanics’, Foundations of Physics, 21, pp. 1265–1284.
Anderson, J.L. (1967), Principles of Relativity Physics, Academic Press, New York.
Barbour, J.B. (1989), Absolute or Relative Motion? Vol. I: The Discovery of Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Bell, J.S. (1976), ‘How to Teach Special Relativity’, Progress in Scientific Culture, 1 (2); also in J.S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 67–80.
Berzi, V. and Gorini, V. (1969), ‘Reciprocity Principle and the Lorentz Transformations’, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 10, pp. 1518–1524.
Bogoslovsky, G.Y. (1977), ‘A Special-Relativistic Theory of the Locally Anisotropic Space-Time’, Il Nuovo Cimento, 40B, pp. 99–115, 116–133.
Brown, H.R. (1990), ‘Does the Principle of Relativity Imply Winnie’s (1970) Equal Passage Times Principle?’, Philosophy of Science, 57, pp. 313–324.
Brown, H.R. and Maia, A. (1992), ‘Light-speed Constancy versus Light-Speed Invariance in the Derivation of Relativistic Kinematics’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, forthcoming.
Budden, T. (1992), ‘The Relativity Principle and the Isotropy of Boosts’, in D. Hull, M. Forbes and K, Okruhlik (eds.), PSA 1992, Volume 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan, 1992, pp. 528–541.
Earman, J. (1974), ‘Covariance, Invariance, and the Equivalence of Frames’, Foundations of Physics, 4, pp. 267–289.
Earman, J. (1989), ‘Locality, Nonlocality and Action at a Distance: a Skeptical Review of Some Philosophical Dogmas’, in R. Kargon and P. Achinstein (eds.), Kelvin’s Baltimore Lectures and Modern Theoretical Physics, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 449–490.
Earman, J. (1990), World Enough and Space-Time, Absolute versus Relational Theories of Space and Time, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Ehlers, J., Pirani, F.A.E., and Schild, A. (1972), ‘The Geometry of Free Fall and Light Propagation’ in L. O’Raifeartaigh (ed.), General Relativity: Papers in Honour of J.L. Synge, Clarendon, Oxford, pp. 63–84.
Einstein, A. (1905), ‘Zur Electrodynamik bewegter Körper’, Annalen der Physik, 17 (4), pp. 891–921.
Einstein, A (1907), ‘Relativitätsprinzip und die aus demselben gezogenen Folgerungen’, Jahrbuch der Radioaktivität, 4, pp. 411–462; 5, pp. 98–99 (Berichtigungen).
Einstein, A. (1969), ‘Autobiographical Notes’, in P.A. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, Open Court, La Salle Illinois, 3rd ed.
Fock, V. (1959), The Theory of Space, Time and Gravitation, Pergamon, London.
Friedman, M. (1983), Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Hirosige, T. (1969), ‘Origins of Lorentz’ Theory of Electrons and the Concept of the Electromagnetic Field’, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 1, pp. 1561–269.
Hirosige, T. (1976), ‘The Ether Problem, the Mechanistic Worldview, and the Origins of the Theory of Relativity’, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 7, pp. 3–82.
Hoffman, B. (1982), ‘Some Einstein Anomalies’, in G. Holton and Y. Elkana (eds.), Albert Einstein; Historical and Cultural Perspectives, The Centennial Symposium in Jerusalem, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Jackson, J.D. (1967), Classical Electrodynamics, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Lucas, J.R. and Hodgson, P.E. (1990), Spacetime and Electromagnetism, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Marzke, R.F. and Wheeler, J.A. (1964), ‘Gravitation as Geometry–I: The Geometry of SpaceTime and the Geometrodynamical Standard Meter’, in H. Y. Chiu, and W. F. Hoffman (eds.), Gravitation and Geometry, Benjamin, New York, pp. 40–64.
Miller, A.I. (1981), Albert Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity, Addison-Wesley, Mass.
Newton, I. (1934), Sir Isaac Newton’s Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and his System of the World, trans. by A. Motte 1729, revised by F. Cajori, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Norton, J. (1989), ‘Coordinates and Covariance: Einstein’s View of Space-Time and the Modern View’, Foundations of Physics, 19, pp. 1215–1263.
Nugaev, R.M. (1988), ‘Special Relativity as a Stage in the Development of Quantum Theory’, Historia Scientiarum, 34, pp. 57–79.
Panofsky, W.K.H. and Phillips, M. (1962), Classical Electricity and Magnetism, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Pauli, W. (1981), Theory of Relativity, Dover; English translation of ‘Relativitätstheorie’, Encyclopädie der matematischen Wissenschaften, Vol. V19, B.G. Teubner, Liepzig, 1921.
Penrose, R. (1987), ‘Newton, Quantum theory and Reality’, in S. Hawking and W. Israel (eds.), Three Hundred Years of Gravitation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 17–49.
Post, H. (1971), ‘Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics; In Praise of Conservative Induction’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 2, pp. 213–255.
Rindler, W. (1985), Introduction to Special Relativity, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Saunders, S.W. and Brown, H.R. (1991), ‘Reflections on ether’, in S.W. Saunders and H.R. Brown (eds.), The Philosophy of Vacuum, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 27–63.
Sklar, L. (1977), ‘Facts, Conventions, and Assumptions in the Theory of Spacetime’, in J. Earman, C. Glymour, and J. Stachel (eds.), Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 8, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 206–274; also in L. Sklar, Philosophy and Spacetime Physics, University of California Press, 1985, Chapter 3.
Stachel, J. (1982), ‘Einstein and Michelson, the Context of Discovery and the Context of Justification’, Astronomische Nachrichten, 303, pp. 47–53.
Stiegler, K.D. (1952), ‘Sur le principe de la constance de la vitesse de la lumière’, Comptes Rendus, 234, pp. 1250–1252.
Synge, J.L. (1965), Relativity: The Special Theory, North Holland, Amsterdam.
Sypel, R., and Brown, H.R. (1992), ‘When is a Physical Theory Relativistic?’, in D. Hull, M.
Forbes and K. Okruhlik (eds.), PSA 1992, Volume 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan, 1992, pp. 507–514.
Taylor, E.F. and Wheeler, J.A. (1966), Spacetime Physics, W. H. Freeman and Company. Torretti, R. (1983), Relativity and Geometry, Pergamon, Oxford.
Torretti, R. (1990), Creative Understanding: Philosophical Reflections on Physics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Tzanakis, C. and Kyritsis, C. (1984), ‘On Special Relativity’s Second Postulate’, Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, 9, pp. 343–352.
Weingard, R. and Smith, G. (1986), ‘Critical Notice: Michael Friedman’s Foundations of Space-Time Theories’, Philosophy of Science, 53, pp. 286–299.
Winnie, J. (1970), ‘Special Relativity without One Way Velocity Assumptions’, Philosophy of Science, 37, pp. 81–99, 223–238.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brown, H.R. (1993). Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics in the Emergence of Special Relativity. In: French, S., Kamminga, H. (eds) Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 148. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1185-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1185-2_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4229-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1185-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive