Abstract
United States courts have expressed an enlightened enforcement policy when dealing with commercial arbitration awards made in other countries. This is consistent with the obligations assumed by the United States in ratifying the 1958 New York Convention and reflects a supportive federal policy towards contractual arbitration, in general.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
417 US 506 (1973), at 520.
517 F Supp 948 (SD Ohio 1981).
Ibid, at 952.
Article I.
508 F 2d 969 (2nd Cir 1974), at 975.
415 F Supp 133 (DNJ 1976).
508 F 2d, at 976.
535 F 2nd 334 (5th Cir 1976).
24 ILM 1064 (1985). See brief details, supra, Introduction, at 3–4.
Fotochrome, Inc v Copal Co Ltd 517 F 2d 512 (2nd Cir 1975).
484 F Supp 1063 (ND Ga 1980).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coulson, R. (1987). So far, so good; enforcement of foreign commercial arbitration awards in United States courts. In: Lew, J.D.M. (eds) Contemporary Problems in International Arbitration. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1156-2_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1156-2_33
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-89838-926-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1156-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive