Skip to main content

An Evidential Model for Tracking Initiative in Collaborative Dialogue Interactions

  • Chapter

Abstract

In this paper, we argue for the need to distinguish between task initiative and dialogue initiative, and present an evidential model for tracking shifts in both types of initiatives in collaborative dialogue interactions. Our model predicts the task and dialogue initiative holders for the next dialogue turn based on the current initiative holders and the effect that observed cues have on changing them. Our evaluation across various corpora shows that the use of cues consistently provides significant improvement in the system’s prediction of task and dialogue initiative holders. Finally, we show how this initiative tracking model may be employed by a dialogue system to enable the system to tailor its responses to user utterances based on application domain, system’s role in the domain, dialogue history, and user characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, J.: 1991, `Discourse Structure in the TRAINS Project’. In: Darpa Speech and Natural Language Workshop. pp. 325–330.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Map Task Dialogues: 1996, `Transcripts of DCIEM Sleep Deprivation Study, conducted by Defense and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine, Canada, and Human Communication Research Centre, University of Edinburgh and University of Glasgow, UK’. Distrubuted by HCRC and LDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carletta, J.: 1996, `Assessing Agreement on Classification Tasks: The Kappa Statistic’. Computational Linguistics 22, 249–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu-Carroll, J. and M. K. Brown: 1997a, `Initiative in Collaborative Interactions — Its Cues and Effects’. In: Working Notes of the AAAI-97 Spring Symposium on Computational Models for Mixed Initiative Interaction. pp. 16–22. Also available as AAAI TR SS-97–04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu-Carroll, J. and M. K. Brown: 1997b, `Tracking Initiative in Collaborative Dialogue Interactions’. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 262–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu-Carroll, J. and S. Carberry: 1994, `A Plan-Based Model for Response Generation in Collaborative Task-Oriented Dialogues’. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. pp. 799–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu-Carroll, J. and S. Carberry: 1995, `Response Generation in Collaborative Negotiation’. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 136–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G.: 1950, `The Comparison of Percentages in Matched Samples’. Biometrika 37, 256–266.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R., C. Allaby, C. Cumbaa, M. Fitzgerald, K. Ho, B. Hui, C. Latulipe, F. Lu, N. Moussa, D. Pooley, A. Qian, and S. Siddiqi: 1998, `What is Initiative?’. In this issue, pp. 171–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J. and E. H. Shortliffe: 1984, `The Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence’. In: B. Buchanan and E. Shortliffe (eds.): Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project. Addison-Wesley, Chapt. 13, pp. 272–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, D., J. F. Allen, and D. R. Traum: 1993, `The TRAINS 91 Dialogues’. Technical Report TN92–1, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, B. and J. Hirschberg: 1992, `Some Intonational Characteristics of Discourse Structure’. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. pp. 429–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, W. M., N. C. Andreasen, P. McDonald-Scott, M. B. Keller, and R. W. Shapiro: 1981, `Reliability Studies of Psychiatric Diagnosis’. Archives of General Psychiatry 38, 408–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinn, C. I.: 1996, `An Analysis of Initiative Selection in Collaborative Task-Oriented Discourse’. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 278–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinn, C. I.: 1998, `Principles of Mixed-Initiative Human-Computer Collaborative Discourse’. In this issue, pp. 255–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeman, P. A. and J. F. Allen: 1995, `The TRAINS 93 Dialogues’. Technical Report TN94–2, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, P. W. and B. Di Eugenio: 1997, `Control and Initiative in Collaborative Problem Solving Dialogues’. In: Working Notes of the MAI-97 Spring Symposium on Computational Models for Mixed Initiative Interaction. pp. 81–84. Also available as AAAI TR SS-97–04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitano, H. and C. Van Ess-Dykema: 1991, `Toward a Plan-Based Understanding Model for Mixed-Initiative Dialogues’. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, L. and S. Carberry: 1991, `A Tripartite Plan-based Model of Dialogue’. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J. C., B. A. Stone, and G. D. Stelling: 1999, `Lifelike Pedagogical Agents for Mixed-Initiative Problem Solving in Constructivist Learning Environments’. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 9 (1–2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Litman, D. and J. Allen: 1987, `A Plan Recognition Model for Subdialogues in Conversation’. Cognitive Science 11, 163–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novick, D. G.: 1988, `Control of Mixed-Initiative Discourse Through Meta-Locutionary Acts: A Computational Model’. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, D. G. and S. Sutton: 1997, `What is Mixed-Initiative Interaction?’. In: Working Notes of the MAI-97 Spring Symposium on Computational Models for Mixed Initiative Interaction. pp. 114–116. Also available as AAAI TR SS-97–04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passonneau, R. J. and D. J. Litman: 1993, `Intention-Based Segmentation: Human Reliability and Correlation with Linguistic Cues’. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 148–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J.: 1990, `Bayesian and Belief-Fuctions Formalisms for Evidential Reasoning: A Conceptual Analysis’. In: G. Shafer and J. Pearl (eds.): Readings in Uncertain Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 540–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M. E.: 1990, `Plans as Complex Mental Attitudes’. In: P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. E. Pollack (eds.): Intentions in Communication. MIT Press, pp. 77–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramshaw, L. A.: 1991, `A Three-Level Model for Plan Exploration’. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 36–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, C. and C. L. Sidner: 1998, `COLLAGEN: A Collaboration Manager for Software Interface Agents’. In this issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G.: 1976, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. and N. J. Castellan, Jr.: 1988, Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. W. and D. R. Hipp: 1994, Spoken Natural Language Dialog Systems — A Practical Approach. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SRI Transcripts: 1992, `Transcripts derived from audiotape conversations made at SRI International

    Google Scholar 

  • Menlo Park, CA’. Prepared by Jacqueline Kowtko under the direction of Patti Price.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swerts, M.: 1997, `Prosodic Features at Discourse Boundaries of Different Strength’. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 101(1) 514–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Switchboard Credit Card Corpus: 1992, `Transcripts of telephone conversations on the topic of credit card use, collected at Texas Instruments’. Produced by NIST, available through LDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beek, P. G.: 1987, `A model for generating better explanations’. In: Proceedings of the 25 th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Stanford, CA, pp. 215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. and S. Whittaker: 1990, `Mixed Initiative in Dialogue: An Investigation into Discourse Segmentation’. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. A.: 1992, `Redundancy in Collaborative Dialogue’. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. pp. 345–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, S. and P. Stenton: 1988, `Cues and Control in Expert-Client Dialogues’. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chu-Carroll, J., Brown, M.K. (1998). An Evidential Model for Tracking Initiative in Collaborative Dialogue Interactions. In: Haller, S., Kobsa, A., McRoy, S. (eds) Computational Models of Mixed-Initiative Interaction. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1118-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1118-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5171-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1118-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics