Skip to main content
  • 99 Accesses

Abstract

A provision prohibiting torture and other kinds of cruel treatment is a natural part of any comprehensive human rights instrument, and it is no coincidence that this right occupies a very prominent place in most human rights agreements. It generally appears immediately after the most fundamental of all human rights, i.e. the right to life.1 Moreover, in the basic human rights conventions, the prohibition against torture is absolute and unconditional, which means that it allows no exceptions in special cases or in order to satisfy weighty public needs. Indeed, it is one of the few rights from which no derogation may be made in time of war or other emergency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 5 of the American Convention on Human Rights.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights reads as follows: ‘No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.’

    Google Scholar 

  3. Article 7 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights reads as follows: ‘No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.’

    Google Scholar 

  4. Report on Torture, London 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Torture in the Eighties, London 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights reads as follows: ‘No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.’

    Google Scholar 

  7. Article 5 paragraphs 1 and 2 of the American Convention on Human Rights read as fol -lows: ‘1. Every person has the right to have his physical, mental, and moral integrity respected. 2. No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman, or degrading punishment or treatment. All persons deprived of their liberty shall be treated with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person.’

    Google Scholar 

  8. Article 5 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights reads as follows: ‘Every individual shall have the right to the respect of the dignity inherent in a human being and to the recognition of his legal status. All forms of exploitation and degradation of man particularly slavery, slave trade, torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment and treatment shall be prohibited.’

    Google Scholar 

  9. General comment adopted by the Human Rights Committee at its 378th meeting on 27 July 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Communication No. 30/1978 Irene Bleier Lewenhojf et al. v. Uruguay, views adopted on 29 March 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Communication No. 49/1979 Dave Marais Jr v. Madagascar, views adopted on 24 March 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Communications Nos. 241/1987 and 242/1987 Birindwa ci Birhashwirwa et al v. Zaire, views adopted on 2 November 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Communication No. 188/1984 Martinez Portorreal v. Dominican Republic, views adopted on 5 November 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Communications Nos. 210/1986 and 225/1987 Pratt et al v. Jamaica, views adopted on 6 April 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. About these cases, see N.S. Rodley, The Treatment of Prisoners under International Law (1987) 102–106.

    Google Scholar 

  16. The case against Greece was also brought by the Netherlands, but as regards the allegations of torture and ill-treatment the three Scandinavian Governments were the only applicants.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Report adopted on 5 November 1969, Chapter IV, Introduction, paragraph 2.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Report, Chapter IV, Introduction, paragraph 30.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Report, Chapter IV, Introduction, paragraph 31.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Report, Chapter IV, Opinion of the Commission, paragraph 11.

    Google Scholar 

  21. ECHR (1978) Series A, No. 25; paragraph 96 of judgment.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Judgment, paragraph 167.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Commission’s Report of 11 December 1990, paragraphs 99–100.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Commission’s decisions regarding applications Nos. 14289/88 and 15776/89.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Application No. 7994/77 Kotälla v. Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Applications Nos. 7572/76, 7586/76 and 7587/76, decision of 7 July 1978, The Law, A, paragraph 5.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Application No. 8317/78.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Application No. 8158/78.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Application No. 6870/75.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Commission’s Report of 16 December 1982, paragraphs 75–76.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Application No. 11701/85.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Commission’s Report of 1 March 1991, paragraph 254.

    Google Scholar 

  33. ECHR (1978) Series A, No. 26; paragraph 30 of judgment.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Judgment, paragraph 33.

    Google Scholar 

  35. ECHR (1982) Series A, No. 48; paragraphs 29–30 of judgment.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Commission’s Report of 18 July 1986, paragraphs 86–88.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Commission’s Report of 8 October 1991 in the Costetto-Roberts case, paragraph 42, and its Report of the same date in the Y. v. United Kingdom case, paragraphs 43–45.

    Google Scholar 

  38. ECHR (1989) Series A, No. 161; paragraph 104 of judgment.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Judgment, paragraph 88.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Judgment, paragraphs 90 and 99.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Judgment, paragraph 111.

    Google Scholar 

  42. ECHR (1991) Series A, No. 201; paragraphs 77–82 of judgment.

    Google Scholar 

  43. ECHR (1992) Series A, No. 215; paragraph 111 of judgment.

    Google Scholar 

  44. The Committee’s First General Report, paragraph 97.

    Google Scholar 

  45. During the first fourteen months of its existence (from November 1989 to December 1990), the Committee carried out four periodic visits (to Austria, Denmark, Malta and the United Kingdom) and one ad hoc visit (to Turkey).

    Google Scholar 

  46. According to Article 7 paragraph 2 of the Convention, visits shall be carried out by at least two members of the Committee. However, the Committee has decided that delegations going to large countries should consist of five Committee members, plus one or two experts and two members of the Secretariat, whereas delegations going to small countries should be composed of three to four Committee members, plus one expert and one or two members of the Secretariat. See First General Report, paragraph 55.

    Google Scholar 

  47. First General Report, paragraph 88.

    Google Scholar 

  48. First General Report, paragraph 51.

    Google Scholar 

  49. First General Report, paragraphs 32–33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Frank Emmert

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Danelius, H. (1993). The International Protection against Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. In: Emmert, F. (eds) Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law / Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit européen. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1074-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1074-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-1076-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1074-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics