Skip to main content

Socially Responsible Decision Making by Autonomous Agents

  • Chapter
Cognition, Agency and Rationality

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies Series ((PSSP,volume 79))

Abstract

Most autonomous agents are situated in a social context and need to interact with other agents (both human and artificial) to complete their problem solving objectives. Such agents are usually capable ofperforming a wide range of actions and engaging in a variety of social interactions. Faced with this variety of options, an agent must decide what to do. There are many potential decision making functions which could be employed to make the choice. Each such function will have a different effect on the success of the individual agent and of the overall system in which it is situated. Therefore, this paper examines agents’ decision making functions to ascertain their likely properties and attributes. A framework for characterising social decision making i s presented and a socially responsible decision making principle is proposed which enables both the agent and the overall system to perform well. This principle is illustrated, and empirically evaluated, in a multi-agent system for unloading lorries at a warehouse.

This work has been supported by an EPSRC studentship and by a Drapers Company scholarship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Castelfranchi, C., 1990: Social Power: A Point Missed in Multi-Agent DAI and HCI, in Y. Demazeau and J. P. MĂĽller (eds.), Decentralized AI, Elsevier, pp. 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi, C., 1995: Commitments: From Individual Intentions to Groups and Organisations, Proc 1st Int. Conf. on Multi-Agent Systems, San Francisco, USA, 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesta, A., Miceli, M., and Rizzo, P., 1996: Help Under Risky Conditions: Robustness of the Social Attitude and System Performance, Proc 2nd Int Conf on Multi-Agent Systems, Kyoto, Japan, 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R., and Smith, R. G. 1983: Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving, Artificial Intelligence 20, 63–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J., 1992: Rationality and its Roles in Reasoning, Computational Intelligence 8 (2), 376–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erman, L. D., and Lesser, V. R., 1975: A multi-level organisation for problem solving using many diverse cooperating sources of knowledge, Proc. Int. Joint Conf. on AI, Stanford, CA., 483–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferber, J., and Drogul, A., 1992: Using Reactive Multi-Agent Systems in Simulation and Problem Solving in Distributed Artificial Intelligence: Theory and Praxis, in N. M. Avouris and L. Gasser (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 53–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, K., MĂĽller, J. P., and Pischel, M., 1996: Cooperative transportation scheduling: an application domain for DAI, Int. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence 10 (1), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, S., and Graesser, A., 1996: Is it an Agent, or just a Program, Proceedings Third International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages, Budapest, Hungary, 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, L. M., and Jennings, N. R., 1997: Social Rational Agents— Preliminary Thoughts, Proc. of Second Workshop on Practical Reasoning and Rationality, Manchester, UK. Janca, P. C., 1995: Pragmatic Application of Information Agents, BIS Strategic Report. Jennings, N. R., 1993: Commitments and Conventions: The Foundation of Coordination in Multi-Agent Systems, The Knowledge Engineering Review 8 (3), 223–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, N. R., and Campos, J. R., 1997: Towards a Social Level Characterisation of Socially Responsible Agents, IEE Proceedings on Software Engineering 144 (1) 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalenka, S., and Jennings, N. R., 1995: On Social Attitudes: A Preliminary Report, Proc. First Int. Workshop on Decentralised Intelligent Multi-Agent Systems, Krakov, Poland, 233–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketchpel, S., 1993: Coalition Formation Amongst Autonomous Agents, Proc 5th European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, Neuchatel, Switzerland, August 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesser, V.R, and Corkill, D.D., 1987: Distributed Problem Solving, in S. C. Shapiro (ed.), Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence, John Wiley and Sons, pp. 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesser, V.R., and Corkill, D.D., 1983: The Distributed Vehicle Monitoring Testbed: A Tool for Investigating Distributed Problem Solving Networks, AI Magazine, Fall, 15–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, S., 1992: Trust and Reliance in Multi-Agent Systems, Proc 4th European

    Google Scholar 

  • Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, Rome, Italy. Newell, A., 1982: The Knowledge Level, Artificial Intelligence 18, 87–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overgaard, L., Petersen, H. G., and Perram, J. W., 1996: Reactive motion planning: a multi-agent approach, Int. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence 10 (1), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ovum Report (1994): Intelligent agents: the new revolution in software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S., and Wefald, E., 1991: Do the right thing, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., 1996: Reciprocity: a Foundational Principle for Promoting Cooperative Behaviour among Self Interested Agents, Proc 2nd Int. Conf. on Multi-Agent Systems, Kyoto, Japan, 322–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shehory, A., and Kraus, S., 1995: Task Allocation via Coalition formation among autonomous agents, Proc. 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sichman, J. S., Conte, R., Demazeau, Y., and Castelfranchi, C., 1994: A Social Reasoning Mechanism Based on Dependence Networks, Proc 11th European Conf on AI, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 188–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steels, L., 1989: Cooperation between distributed agents through self organisation, Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wavish, P., and Graham, M., 1996: A situated action approach to implementing characters in computer games, Int. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence 10 (1), 53–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, M. P., 1993: A Market-Oriented Programming Environment and its Application to Distributed Multi-commodity Flow Problems, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 1, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, M. J., and Jennings, N. R., 1995: Intelligent Agents: Theory and Practice, The Knowledge Engineering Review 10 (2), 115–152.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kalenka, S., Jennings, N.R. (1999). Socially Responsible Decision Making by Autonomous Agents. In: Korta, K., Sosa, E., Arrazola, X. (eds) Cognition, Agency and Rationality. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 79. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1070-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1070-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5321-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1070-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics