Skip to main content

Defining Coalbed Methane Exploration Fairways: An Example from the Piceance Basin, Rocky Mountain Foreland, Western United States

  • Chapter
Coalbed Methane: Scientific, Environmental and Economic Evaluation

Abstract

A basin-scale coalbed methane producibility and exploration model has been developed on the basis of research performed in the San Juan, Sand Wash, Greater Green Rivers, and Piceance Basins of the Rocky Mountain Foreland and reconnaissance studies of several other producing and prospective coal basins in the United States and worldwide. The producibility model indicates that depositional setting and coal distribution, coal rank, gas content, permeability, hydrodynamics, and tectonic/structural setting are controls critical to coalbed methane production. However, knowledge of a basin’s geologic and hydrologic characteristics will not facilitate conclusions about coalbed methane producibility because it is the interplay among geologic and hydrologic controls on production and their spatial relation that govern producibility. High producibility requires that the geologic and hydrologic controls be synergistically combined. That synergism is absent in the marginally producing, hydrocarbon-overpressured Piceance Basin. As predicted from the coalbed methane producibility model, significant coalbed methane production (greater than 1 MMcf/d [28 Mm3/d]) may be precluded in many parts of the hydrocarbon-overpressured Piceance Basin by the absence of coalbed reservoir continuity, high permeability, and dynamic groundwater flow. The best potential for coalbed methane production may lie in conventional and compartmentalized traps basinward of where outcrop and subsurface coals are in good reservoir and hydraulic communication and/or in areas of vertical flow potential and fracture-enhanced permeability. In the low-permeability, hydrocarbon-overpressured Piceance Basin, exploration and development of migrated conventionally and hydrodynamically trapped gases, in-situ-generated secondary biogenic gases, and solution gases will be required to achieve high coalbed methane production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ayers, W. B., Jr., Kaiser, W. R., Laubach, S. E., Ambrose, W. A., Baumgardner, R. W., Jr., Scott, A.,R., Tyler, Roger, Yeh, Joseph, Hawkins, G. J., Swartz, T. E., Schultz-Ela, D. D., Zellers, S. D., Tremain, C. M., and Whitehead N. H., III, 1991: “Geologic and Hydrologic Controls on the Occurrence and Producibility of Coalbed Methane, Fruitland Formation, San Juan Basin”: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, topical report prepared for the Gas Research Institute (GRI-91/0072), 314 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostick, N. H., and Freeman, V. L., 1984: “Tests of Vitrinite Reflectance and Paleotemperature Models at the Multiwell Experiment Site, Piceance Creek Basin, Colorado, in Spencer, C. W., and Keighin, C. W., eds., Geological Studies in Support of the U.S. Department of Energy Multiwell Experiment, Garfield County, Colorado U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 84–757, p. 110–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, B. A., 1976: “Coal Deposits of the Carbondale, Grand Hogback, and Southern Danforth Hills Coal Fields, Eastern Piceance Basin, Colorado”: Quarterly of the Colorado School of Mines, V. 71, No. 1, 138 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, W. R., and Snyder, W. S., 1978: “Plate Tectonics of the Laramide Orogeny,” in Matthews Vincent, III, ed., Laramide Folding Associated with Basement Block Faulting in the Western United States Geological Society of America Memoir 151, p. 355–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. C., and Nuccio, V. F., 1986, “Structural and Thermal History of the Piceance Creek Basin, Western Colorado, in Relation to Hydrocarbon Occurrence in the Mesaverde Group,” in Spencer, C. W., and Mast, R. F., eds., Geology of Tight Gas Reservoirs American Association of Petroleum Geologists Studies in Geology 24, p. 165–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, W. R., Hamilton, D. S., Scott, A. R., and Tyler, Roger, 1994a: “Geological and Hydrological Controls on the Producibility of Coalbed Methane”: Journal of the Geological Society of London, V. 151, p. 417–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, W., R., and Scott, A. R., 1996: “Hydrologic Setting of the Williams Fork Formation, Piceance Basin, Colorado, in Tyler, Roger, Scott, A. R., Kaiser, W. R., Nance, H. S., McMurry, R. G., Tremain, C. M., and Mayor, M. J., eds. Geologic and Hydrologic Controls Critical to Coalbed Methane Producibility and Resource Assessment: Williams Fork Formation. Piceance Basin, Northwest Colorado The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, topical report prepared for the Gas Research Institute, GRI-95/0532, p. 252268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, W. R., Scott, A. R., Hamilton, D. S., Tyler, Roger, McMurry, R. G., Zhou, Naijiang, and Tremain, C. M., 1993: Geologic and Hydrologic Controls on Coalbed Methane: Sand Wash Basin Colorado and Wyoming The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, topical report prepared for the Gas Research Institute under contract no. 5091–214–2261 (GRI–92/0420), 151 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, W. R., Scott, A. R., Hamilton, D. S., Tyler, Roger, McMurry, R. G., Zhou, Naijiang, and Tremain, C. M., 1994b: Geologic and Hydrologic Controls on Coalbed Methane: Sand Wash Basin. Colorado and Wyoming The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology Report of Investigations No. 220, and Colorado Geologic Survey, Department of Natural Resources, Resource Series 30, 151 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, W. R., Scott, A. R., and Roger, Tyler, 1995: “Geology and Hydrogeology of Coalbed Methane Producibility in the United States: Analogs for the World”: Intergas Unconventional Gas Symposium, May 15–16, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, Intergas ‘85 Short Course, 516 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukal, G. C., Price, E. H., Hill, R. E., and Monson, E. R., 1992: “Results of Field Verification Tests in the Tight Mesaverde Group: Piceance Basin, Colorado”: CER Corporation: U.S. Department of Energy, DOE/MC/24120312 (DE93000201), 153 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T. L., and Mayor, M. J., 1995: “Western Cretaceous Coal Seam Project Final Report”: topical report prepared for the Gas Research Institute, GRI-94/0089, 155 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurry, R. G., and Tyler, Roger, 1996: “Genetic Stratigraphy and Coal Deposition of Progradational Sequences in the Upper Cretaceous Williams Fork Formation, Mesaverde Group, Piceance Basin, Colorado,” in Tyler, Roger, Scott, A. R., Kaiser, W. R., Nance, H. S., McMurry, R. G., Tremain, C. M., and Mayor, M. J., Geologic and Hydrologic Controls Critical to Coalbed Methane Producibility and Resource Assessment: Williams Fork Formation. Piceance Basin. Northwest Colorado The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, topical report prepared for the Gas Research Institute under contract no. 5091–214–2261, GRI–95/ 0532, p. 112–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuccio, V. F., and Johnson, R. C., 1 983: “Preliminary Thermal Maturity Map of the Cameo-Fairfield or Equivalent Coal Zone in the Piceance Creek Basin, Colorado”: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map MF-1575, scale 1: 253, 440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinecke, K. M., Rice, D. D., and Johnson, R. C., 1991: “Characteristics and Development of Fluvial Sandstone and Coalbed Reservoirs of Upper Cretaceous Mesaverde Group, Grand Valley Field, Colorado,” in Schwochow, S. D., Murray, D. K., and Fahy, M. F., eds., Coalbed Methane of Western North America Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists, p. 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. R., 1996: “Coalification, Cleat Development, Coal Gas Composition and Origins, and Gas Content of Williams Fork Coals in the Piceance Basin, Colorado,” in Tyler, Roger, Scott, A. R., Kaiser, W. R., Nance, H. S., McMurry, R. G., Tremain, C. M., and Mayor, M. J., eds., Geologic and Hydrologic Controls Critical to Coalbed Methane Producibility and Resource Assessment: Williams Fork Formation. Piceance Basin. Northwest Colorado The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, topical report prepared for the Gas Research Institute under contract no. 5091–214–2261, GRI–95/0532, p. 220 – 251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. R., and Ambrose, W. A., 1992: “Thermal Maturity and Coalbed Methane Potential of the Greater Green River, Piceance, Powder River, and Raton Basins (abs.),” in “Calgary: American Association of Petroleum Geologists 1992 annual convention official program”: American Association of Petroleum Geologists, p. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. R., Kaiser, W. R., and Ayers, W. B., Jr., 1994a: “Thermogenic and Secondary Biogenic Gases, San Juan Basin, Colorado and New Mexico—Implications for Coalbed Gas Producibility: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, V. 78, No. 8, p. 1186–1209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. R., Kaiser, W. R., and Tyler, Roger, I996a, Development and Evaluation of a Basin-Scale Coalbed Methane Producibility Model; San Juan, Sand Wash, and Piceance Basins, Rocky Mountain Foreland,“ in Tyler, Roger, Scott, A. R., Kaiser, W. R., Nance, H. S., McMurry, R. G., Tremain, C. M., and Mayor, M. J., eds., Geologic and Hydrologic Controls Critical to Coalbed Methane Producibility and Resource Assessment: Williams Fork Formation, Piceance Basin. Northwest Colorado The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, topical report prepared for the Gas Research Institute, GRI-95/0532, p. 310–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. R., and Tyler, Roger, 1998, Geologic and hydrologic controls critical to coalbed methane production and resource assessment - The United States experience: Analogs useful for Australian coal basins: The Texas Bureau of Economic Geology, Coalbed Methane Workshop, in conjunction with the University of Queensland, Australia, and Indiana University, United States of America, International Conference on Coal Seam Gas and Oil (CSGO), Brisbane, Australia, 668 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. R., Tyler, Roger, Hamilton, D. S., and Naijiang, Zhou, 1994b: “Coal and Coal Gas Resources of the Greater Green River Basin: Application of an Improved Approach to Resource Estimation,” in Sonneburg, S. A. (compiler), Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists and Colorado Oil and Gas Association, First Biennial Conference, Natural Gas in the Western United States, Lakewood, Colorado, October 17–18, 1994, unpaginated (4 p).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. R., Tyler, Roger, Kaiser, W. R., McMurry, R. G., Nance, H. S., and Tremain, C. M., 1996b: “Coal and Coalbed Methane Resources and Production in the Piceance Basin, Colorado,” in Tyler, Roger, Scott, A. R., Kaiser, W. R., Nance, H. S., McMurry, R. G., Tremain, C. M., and Mayor, M. J., eds., Geologic and Hydrologic Controls Critical to Coalbed Methane Producibility and Resource Assessment: Williams Fork Formation Piceance Basin. Northwest Colorado The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, topical report prepared for the Gas Research Institute under contract no. 5091–214–2261, GRI–95/0532, p. 269 – 285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremain, C. M., 1982: “Coalbed Methane Potential of the Piceance Basin, Colorado”: Colorado Geological Survey Open-File Report 82–1, 49 p., 5 sheets.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremain, C. M., and Toomey, J., 1983: “Coalbed Methane Desorption Data”: Colorado Geological Survey Open-File Report 81–4, 514 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremain, C. M., and Tyler, Roger, 1996, “Cleat, Fracture, and Stress Patterns in the Piceance Basin, Colorado: Controls on Coal Permeability and Coalbed Methane Producibility,” in Tyler, Roger, Scott, A. R., Kaiser, W. R., Nance, H. S., McMurry, R. G., Tremain, C. M., and M.J. Mayor, eds., Geologic and Hydrologic Controls Critical to Coalbed Methane Producibility and Resource Assessment: Williams Fork Formation Piceance Basin. northwest Colorado The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, topical report prepared for the Gas Research Institute under contract no. 5091–214–2261, GRI–95/0532, p. 33 – 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweto, Ogden, 1980: “Summary of Laramide Orogeny in Colorado,” in Kent, H. C., and Porter, K. W., eds., Colorado Geology Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists, p. 131–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R., Kaiser, W. R, Scott, A. R., Hamilton, D. S., and Ambrose, W. A., 1995: Geologic and Hydrologic Assessment of Natural Gas from Coal: Greater Green River, Piceance, Powder River. and Raton Basins, Western United States The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology Report of Investigations No. 228, 219 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, Roger, Kaiser, W. R., Scott, A. R., Hamilton, D. S., McMurry, R. G., and Naijiang, Zhou, 1994: “Geologic and Hydrologic Assessment of Natural Gas from Coal Seams in the Mesaverde Group and Fort Union Formation, Greater Green River Basin, Wyoming and Colorado”: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, topical report prepared for the Gas Research Institute, GRI-93/0320, 120 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, Roger, Scott, A. R., and Kaiser, W. R., 1997, Defining coalbed gas exploration fairways in low permeability, hydrocarbon overpressured basins: an example from the Piceance Basin, northwest Colorado, in Proceedings, International Coalbed Methane symposium: Tuscaloosa, The University of Alabama, p. 527–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, Roger, Scott, A. R., Kaiser, W. R., and McMurry, R. G., 1997, The application of a coalbed methane producibility model in defining coalbed methane exploration fairways and sweet spots: examples from the San Juan, Sand Wash, and Piceance Basins: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, Report of Investigations No. 244, 59 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, Roger, Scott, A. R., Kaiser, W. R., Nance, H. S., McMurry, R. G., Tremain, C. M., and Mayor, M. J., 1996: “Geologic and Hydrologic Controls Critical to Coalbed Methane Producibility and Resource Assessment: Williams Fork Formation, Piceance Basin, Northwest Colorado”: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, topical report prepared for the Gas Research Institute, GRI-95/0532, 398 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tyler, R., Scott, A.R., Kaiser, W.R. (1999). Defining Coalbed Methane Exploration Fairways: An Example from the Piceance Basin, Rocky Mountain Foreland, Western United States. In: Mastalerz, M., Glikson, M., Golding, S.D. (eds) Coalbed Methane: Scientific, Environmental and Economic Evaluation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1062-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1062-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5217-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1062-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics