Skip to main content

Shoreline Stabilization Approaches in Response to Sea Level Rise: U.S. Experience and Implications for Pacific Island and Asian Nations

  • Chapter
Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in Asia and the Pacific

Abstract

Coastal erosion is a worldwide problem; it is estimated that over 70% of the world’s beaches are currently experiencing erosion (Bird, 1985), and this number may approach 90% in the United States.1 Almost every conceivable form of shore protection has been attempted in the United States, including construction of seawalls, groins, and jetties as well as beach nourishment. The principal approach to protecting coastal property and maintaining recreational beaches inthe United States today is beach nourishment. Engineering structures such as groins and seawalls have often been shown to have detrimental effects on adjacent beaches. Also, their construction and maintenance costs are quite high. Therefore, coastal communities have come to rely on a “soft” engineering solution — beach nourishment — because it is environmentally sound, aesthetically pleasing, and, so far, economically feasible. However, global warming and accelerated sea level rise will cause more rapid rates of beach loss and could make even this alternative too costly for many resort areas along the U.S. shoreline. The cost to nourish all the major recreational oceanic beaches in the United States was estimated based on various sea level rise scenarios. The beach nourishment approach involves placing enough sand on the beach to maintain stable (nonretreating) conditions in response to rising sea level. The quantity of sand required to “hold the line” is evaluated under various sea level rise scenarios from the baseline scenario to the 1-m estimate ofthe Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Beach nourishment is not a practical alternative for most Pacific island nations because sand is a scarce resource. In fact, beaches are often mined for sand for construction, contributing to beach erosion. For mainland countries, beach fill projects are more practical. Singapore was one of the that countries to use this technology in combination with building offshore breakwaters to form artificial headlands. As Western style sunbathing and the overall popularity of beaches for recreation continue to grow, beach nourishment can be expected to become a more common way to deal with sea level rise induced coastal erosion for highly developed beach resort areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abete T.: 1993, The Kiribati preliminary assessment to accelerated sea level rise, in: Vulnerability Assessment to Sea Level Rise and Coastal Zone Management, Proceedings of IPCC WCC93 Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan, pp. 91–98. Bird E.C.F.: 1985, Coastline Changes: A Global Review, Wiley Interscience, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambers G.: 1994, Assessment of the vulnerability of coastal areas in Antigua and Nevis to sea level rise, in: Global Climate Change and the Rising Challenge of the Sea, Proceedings of the IPCC CZMS Workshop, Margarita Island, Venezuela, pp. 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison A.T., Nicholls R.J., and Leatherman S.P.: 1992, Journal of Coastal Research 8, 984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duane D.B. and Meisburger E.P.: 1969, Geomorphology and Sediments of the Nearshore Continental Shelf, Miami to Palm Beach, Florida, TM No. 29, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Mississippi.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hallermeier R.J.: 1981, Coastal Engineering 4, 253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtus P., Crawford M., Makroro C., and Sullivan S.: 1992, Vulnerability Assessment for Accelerated Sea Level Rise

    Google Scholar 

  • Case Studies, Majuro Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands, SPREP Report No. 60, Apia, Western Samoa. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 1990, Strategies for Adaptation to Sea Level Rise, Rijkswaterstaat, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 1996, Climate Change 1995: The IPCC Second Assessment Report, Volume 2: Scientific-Technical Analyses of Impacts, Adaptations, and Mitigation of Climate Change, Watson R.T., Zinyowera M.C., and Moss R.H. (eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leatherman S.P.: 1986, Shoreline response to sea level rise: Ocean City, Maryland, in: Proceedings of Icelandic Conference on Coasts and Rivers, Reykjavik, Iceland, pp. 267–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leatherman S.P.: 1991, Coasts and beaches, in: Heritage of Engineering Geology: The First Hundred Years, Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 183–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council: 1987, Responding to Changes in Sea Level: Engineering Implications, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council: 1990, Managing Coastal Erosion, National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Nicholls R.J. and Leatherman S.P.: 1995, Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 14, 323. Silvester R.: 1974, Coastal Engineering, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stive M.J.F., Nicholls R.J., and DeVriend H.J.: 1991, Coastal Engineering 16, 147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Array Corps ofEngineers: 1984, Shore Protection Manual, 3 volumes, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: 1994, Shoreline Protection and Beach Erosion Control Study, Institute for Water Resources, Alexandria, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leatherman, S.P. (1996). Shoreline Stabilization Approaches in Response to Sea Level Rise: U.S. Experience and Implications for Pacific Island and Asian Nations. In: Erda, L., et al. Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in Asia and the Pacific. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1053-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1053-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4745-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1053-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics