Abstract
It has been claimed that ceteris paribus laws, rather than strict laws are the proper aim of the special sciences. This is so because the causal regularities found in these domains are exception-ridden, being contingent on the presence of the appropriate conditions and the absence of interfering factors. I argue that the ceteris paribus strategy obscures rather than illuminates the important similarities and differences between representations of causal regularities in the exact and inexact sciences. In particular, a detailed account of the types and degrees of contingency found in the domain of biology permits a more adequate understanding of the relations among the sciences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beatty, J.: 1995, ‘The Evolutionary Contingency Thesis’, in G. Wolters and. J. G. Lennox (eds), Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 45–81.
Beatty, J.: 1997, ‘Why Do Biologists Argue Like They Do?’, Philosophy of Science 64, S432 - S443.
Bernstein, H., G. S. Byers and R. E. Michod: 1981, ‘The Evolution of Sexual Reproduction: The Importance of DNA Repair, Complementation, and Variation’, American Naturalist 117, 537–549.
Bonner, J. T.: 1988, The Evolution of Complexity, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Brandon, R.: 1997, ‘Does Biology have Laws: The Experimental Evidence’, Philosophy of Science 64, S444 - S458.
Brandon, R.: 1982, ‘Levels of Selection’, in P. Asquith and T. Nickels (eds), PSA 1982, Vol. 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 315–323.
Brown, J. H. and G. West (eds): 2000, Scaling in Biology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Buss, L.: 1987, The Evolution of Individuality, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Calderone, N. W. and R. E. Page, Jr.: 1992, ‘Effects of Interactions among Genotypically Diverse Nestmates on Task Specializations by Foraging Honey Bees (Apis mellifera)’, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 30, 219–226.
Cartwright, N. D.: 1994, Natures Capacities and Their Measurement, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Cartwright, N. D.: 1999, Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Earman, J., J. Roberts, and S. Smith: 2002, ‘Ceteris Paribus Lost’, (this issue).
Glymour, C.: 2001, The Mind’s Arrows: Bayes Nets and Graphical Causal Models in Psychology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Goodwin, B. C.: 1994, How the Leopard Changed its Spots: The Evolution of Complexity, C. Scribner’s Sons, New York.
Goodwin, B. C. and P. Saunders (eds): 1992, Theoretical Biology: Epigenetic and Evolutionary Order from Complex Systems, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
Gould, S. J.: 1990: Wonderful Life: Burgess Shale and the Nature of History, W. W. Norton, New York.
Horgan, J.: 1996, The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age, Broadway Books, New York.
Hull, D. L.: 1989, The Metaphysics of Evolution, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
Lange, M.: 2000, Natural Laws in Scientific Practice, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Lange, M.: 2002, ‘Who’s Afraid of Ceteris Paribus Laws: Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Them’, (this issue).
Mitchell, S. D.: 1997, ‘Pragmatic Laws’, Philosophy of Science 64, S468 - S479.
Mitchell, S. D.: 2000, ‘Dimensions of Scientific Law’, Philosophy of Science 67, 242–265.
Mitchell, S. D.: 2002, ‘Contingent Generalizations: Lessons from Biology’ in R. Mayntz (ed.), Akteure, Mechanismen, Modelle. Zur Theoriefähigkeit makro-sozialer Analysen, Max-Planck-Instituts für Gesellschaftsforschung.
Nicolis, G. and I. Prigogine: 1989, Exploring Complexity: An Introduction, W.H. Freeman, New York.
Page, R. E., Jr. and R. A. Metcalf: 1982, ‘Multiple Mating, Sperm Utilization, and Social Evolution’, American Naturalist 119, 263–281.
Page, R. E., Jr. and S. D. Mitchell: 1991, ‘Self Organization and Adaptation in Insect Societies’, in A. Fine, M. Forbes, and L. Wessels (eds), PSA 1990, Vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI, pp. 289–298.
Pietroski and Rey: 1995, ‘When Others Things Aren’t Equal: Saving Ceteris Paris Laws from Vacuity’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46, 81–110.
Raff, R.: 1996, The Shape of Life, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Salthe, S. N.: 1993, Development and Evolution: Complexity and Change in Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Simon, H.: 1981, The Science of the Artificial, 2nd edn, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Sober, E.: 1984, The Nature of Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Sober, E.: 1997, ‘Two Outbreaks of Lawlessness in Recent Philosophy of Biology’, Philosophy of Science 64, S432–5444.
Spirtes, P., C. Glymour, and R. Scheines: 1993, Causation, Prediction, and Search, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Tofts C. and N. R. Franks: 1992, ‘Doing the Right Thing: Ants, Honeybees and Naked Mole-Rats’, Trends in Evolution and Ecology 7, 346–349.
Waters, C. K.: 1998, ‘Causal Regularities in the Biological World of Contingent Distributions’, Biology and Philosophy 13, 5–36.
Wilson, E. O.: 1971, Insect Societies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Winston, M.: 1987, The Biology of the Honey Bee, Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA.
Wimsatt, W.: 1986, ‘Forms of Aggregativity’, in Donagon, Perovich and Wedin (eds), Human Nature and Natural Knowledge, Reidel, pp. 259–291.
Woodward, J.: 2000, ‘Explanation and Invariance in the Special Sciences’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51, 197–255.
Woodward, J.: 2001, ‘Law and Explanation in Biology: Invariance is the Kind of Stability That Matters’, Philosophy of Science 68, 1–20.
Woodward, J.: 2002, A Theory of Explanation: Causation, Invariance, and Intervention, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Zimmering, S., L. Sandler, and B. Nicoletti: 1970, ‘Mechanisms of Meiotic Drive’, Annual Review of Genetics 4, 9–436.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mitchell, S.D. (2002). Ceteris Paribus — An Inadequate Representation for Biological Contingency. In: Earman, J., Glymour, C., Mitchell, S. (eds) Ceterus Paribus Laws. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1009-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1009-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6173-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1009-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive