Abstract
This text emerged from fragmentary reflections about physics, science and language. It is an attempt to organize the key ideas around a test question that seems to pervade, though implicitly, the present and future days of the philosophy of science. “Human knowledge” is something much bigger than science proper, but it is science where the question is highly non-trivial. In this perspective I focus on science.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Petrov, A. (2003). Are Bifurcations of Human Knowledge Possible?. In: Ginev, D. (eds) Bulgarian Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 236. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0961-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0961-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6371-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0961-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive