Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 37))

Abstract

A new version of Bell’s theorem is proved which shows the inconsistency of locality, realism and quantum theory. By using Mermin s technique of randomising over the settings on the measurement apparatus, the proof avoids Stapp’s assumption that probabiIities can be equated with relative frequencies. It also avoids the assumption, which Bell and Signer make, that there is a phase-space distribution for which the probabi1ities of quantum theory are marginals. Instead it derives the latter assumption from realism, quantum theory, and standard probability theory. Care is taken throughout to make clear which conditionals are being used and to relate them to the relevant probabi1ities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. N. Mermin, ‘Quantum Mysteries for Anyone’, Journal of Philosophy, 78, 1981, p.397–408

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Stapp. ’ fclhiteheadean Approach to Quantum Theory and Generalised Bell s Theorem’, Foundations of Physics, 9 1977, pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Bell, 1 BertImann’s Socks and the Nature of Reality’, Jnl. de Physique, Colloque C2, Supp. to 3, 42, 1980,pp. 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See addendum 2, K. Popper, Conjectures and Refutations, Routiedge and Kegan Paul, London, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See H. Stapp (1977) and P. Eberhard. Eberhard ‘Bell’s Theorem without Hidden Variables’, Nuovo Cimento, 38B, 1977, pp 75–79: and Mermin (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Fine How to Count Frequencies: A -’rimer for Quantum Realists’, Synthese, 42, 1979, pp.145–158.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krips, H. (1989). Conditionals, Probability and Bell’s Theorem. In: Kafatos, M. (eds) Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 37. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0849-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0849-4_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4058-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0849-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics