Abstract
To some, the topic of AI and Creativity (like the topic of ‘machine thinking’) might sound like a contradiction in terms. For creativity in thinking and other activities, as commonly understood, requires us to withdraw the constraints implicit in rules and rational appraisal. But what could be more rational or rule-bound than the model of the mind and cognition on which AI is founded? The implicit connection here, between creativity and ‘irrationalism’, owes something to Sigmund Freud, who saw creativity as the link between art and play. Both are activities pursued for their own sake, and both involve the suspension of rational principles: “The creative writer does much the same as the child at play. He creates a world of phantasy which he takes very seriously—that is, which he invests with large amounts of emotion—while separating it sharply from reality.”1 There is no reason to suppose that creativity in science is any different. It is identified as that initial phase in scientific inquiry when the principles of rational evaluation and assessment are suspended and a bold conjecture or intuitive guess is made. It is that phase prior to the process of testing by means of the rational principles of deduction and induction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Achinstein, P.: 1971, Law and Explanation: An Essay in the Philosophy of Science, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Boden, M.: 1990, The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London. Culler, J.: 1981, The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Eco, U.: 1976, A Theory of Semiotics, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
Eco, U.: 1979, The Role of the Reader, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
Eco, U.: 1983, Horns, hooves, insteps, in, Eco, U. and Sebeok, T. A. (eds), The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
Eco, U.: 1984, Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language, Indiana University Press, Bloomington. Eco, U. and Sebeok, T. A. (eds): 1983, The Sign of Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
Eco, U.: 1990, The Limits of Interpretation, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
Eco, U., Santambrogio, M. and Violi, P. (eds): 1988, Meaning and Mental Representation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Fiske, J.: 1982, Introduction to Communication Studies, Methuen, London.
Ginzburg, C.: 1983, Morelli, Freud and Sherlock Holmes, in Eco, U. and Sebeok, T. A. (eds), The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 81–118.
Harman, G.: 1965, Inference to the best explanation, Philosophical Review, 64: 88–95. Hawkes, T.: 1977, Structuralism and Semiotics, Methuen, London.
Hofstadter, D. R.: 1985, Metamagical Themas: Questing for the Essence of Mind and Pattern, Basic Books, New York.
Jakobson, R.: 1956, Two aspects of language and two types of linguistic disturbances, in Jakobson, R. and Halle, M. (eds), Fundamentals of Languages, Mouton, The Hague.
Jakobson, R. and Halle, M. (eds): 1956, Fundamentals of Language, Mouton, The Hague. Johnson-Laird, P. N.: 1988, The Computer and the Mind, Fontana, London.
Kuhn, T.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Lakoff, G.: 1987, Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.: 1980, Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lodge, D.: 1977, The Modes of Modern Writing: Metaphor, Metonymy, and the Typology of Modern Literature, Edward Arnold, London.
O’Rorke, P. (ed.): 1990, Working Notes of the 1990 Spring Symposium on Automated Abduction, Technical Report 90–32, University of California, Irvine.
Partridge, D. and Wilks, Y. (eds.): 1990, The Foundations of Artificial Intelligence: A Sourcebook, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Peirce, C. S.: 1878, Deduction, induction, and hypothesis, in Cohen, M. R. (ed.), 1923, Chance, Love, and Logic, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, pp. 131–153.
Peirce, C. S.: 1901, Abduction, induction and deduction, in Burks, A. W. (ed.), 1966, Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. VII, BelKnap Press, Cambridge Mass.
Peirce, C. S.: 1901ff., Abduction and induction, combining selections from mss of 1901, 1903, 1896 and 1908, in Buchler, J. (ed.), The Philosophy of Peirce. Selected Writings, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1940, pp. 150–56.
Polanyi, M.: 1962, Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, corrected version 1962.
Polkinghome, D. E.: 1988, Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences, State University of New York Press, Albany.
Punch, W. F., Tanner, M. C., Josephson, J. R. and Smith, J. W.: 1990, Peirce: A tool for experimenting with abduction, IEEE Expert,October: 34–44.
Schagrin, M. L.: 1991, Review of Paul Thagard, Computational Philosophy of Science, Minds and Machines, 1 (1): 121–124.
Schank, R.: 1990, What is AI anyway? in Partridge, D. and Wilks, Y. (eds), The Foundations of Artificial Intelligence: A Sourcebook, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–13.
Storr, A.: 1972, The Dynamics of Creation, Seker and Warburg, London.
Thagard, P.: 1988, A Computational Philosophy of Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Tursman, R.: 1987, Peirce’s Theory of Scientific Discovery, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harney, M. (1994). Clues to Creativity. In: Dartnall, T. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Creativity. Studies in Cognitive Systems, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0793-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0793-0_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4457-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0793-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive