Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Cognitive Systems ((COGS,volume 17))

  • 424 Accesses

Abstract

To some, the topic of AI and Creativity (like the topic of ‘machine thinking’) might sound like a contradiction in terms. For creativity in thinking and other activities, as commonly understood, requires us to withdraw the constraints implicit in rules and rational appraisal. But what could be more rational or rule-bound than the model of the mind and cognition on which AI is founded? The implicit connection here, between creativity and ‘irrationalism’, owes something to Sigmund Freud, who saw creativity as the link between art and play. Both are activities pursued for their own sake, and both involve the suspension of rational principles: “The creative writer does much the same as the child at play. He creates a world of phantasy which he takes very seriously—that is, which he invests with large amounts of emotion—while separating it sharply from reality.”1 There is no reason to suppose that creativity in science is any different. It is identified as that initial phase in scientific inquiry when the principles of rational evaluation and assessment are suspended and a bold conjecture or intuitive guess is made. It is that phase prior to the process of testing by means of the rational principles of deduction and induction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Achinstein, P.: 1971, Law and Explanation: An Essay in the Philosophy of Science, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M.: 1990, The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London. Culler, J.: 1981, The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U.: 1976, A Theory of Semiotics, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U.: 1979, The Role of the Reader, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U.: 1983, Horns, hooves, insteps, in, Eco, U. and Sebeok, T. A. (eds), The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U.: 1984, Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language, Indiana University Press, Bloomington. Eco, U. and Sebeok, T. A. (eds): 1983, The Sign of Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U.: 1990, The Limits of Interpretation, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U., Santambrogio, M. and Violi, P. (eds): 1988, Meaning and Mental Representation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, J.: 1982, Introduction to Communication Studies, Methuen, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ginzburg, C.: 1983, Morelli, Freud and Sherlock Holmes, in Eco, U. and Sebeok, T. A. (eds), The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 81–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G.: 1965, Inference to the best explanation, Philosophical Review, 64: 88–95. Hawkes, T.: 1977, Structuralism and Semiotics, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, D. R.: 1985, Metamagical Themas: Questing for the Essence of Mind and Pattern, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, R.: 1956, Two aspects of language and two types of linguistic disturbances, in Jakobson, R. and Halle, M. (eds), Fundamentals of Languages, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, R. and Halle, M. (eds): 1956, Fundamentals of Language, Mouton, The Hague. Johnson-Laird, P. N.: 1988, The Computer and the Mind, Fontana, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Lakoff, G.: 1987, Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.: 1980, Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, D.: 1977, The Modes of Modern Writing: Metaphor, Metonymy, and the Typology of Modern Literature, Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rorke, P. (ed.): 1990, Working Notes of the 1990 Spring Symposium on Automated Abduction, Technical Report 90–32, University of California, Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, D. and Wilks, Y. (eds.): 1990, The Foundations of Artificial Intelligence: A Sourcebook, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S.: 1878, Deduction, induction, and hypothesis, in Cohen, M. R. (ed.), 1923, Chance, Love, and Logic, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, pp. 131–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S.: 1901, Abduction, induction and deduction, in Burks, A. W. (ed.), 1966, Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. VII, BelKnap Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S.: 1901ff., Abduction and induction, combining selections from mss of 1901, 1903, 1896 and 1908, in Buchler, J. (ed.), The Philosophy of Peirce. Selected Writings, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1940, pp. 150–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M.: 1962, Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, corrected version 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghome, D. E.: 1988, Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences, State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punch, W. F., Tanner, M. C., Josephson, J. R. and Smith, J. W.: 1990, Peirce: A tool for experimenting with abduction, IEEE Expert,October: 34–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schagrin, M. L.: 1991, Review of Paul Thagard, Computational Philosophy of Science, Minds and Machines, 1 (1): 121–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R.: 1990, What is AI anyway? in Partridge, D. and Wilks, Y. (eds), The Foundations of Artificial Intelligence: A Sourcebook, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–13.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Storr, A.: 1972, The Dynamics of Creation, Seker and Warburg, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P.: 1988, A Computational Philosophy of Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tursman, R.: 1987, Peirce’s Theory of Scientific Discovery, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harney, M. (1994). Clues to Creativity. In: Dartnall, T. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Creativity. Studies in Cognitive Systems, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0793-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0793-0_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4457-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0793-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics